Federalism
Why Federalism Instead of a Unitary or Confederal System?
Not purely philosophical—states already existed with strong institutions & identities.
Unitary System: Central government controls all powers (e.g., UK, France).
Confederal System: Loose union of states with weak central government (e.g., Articles of Confederation).
Federal System: Divides power between national & state governments, preventing tyranny.
State vs. National Loyalties & Power
Early Americans were more loyal to states than the national government.
Federalist #46 (Madison): States remain powerful as a check on federal overreach.
Barron v. Baltimore (1833): Bill of Rights only applied to federal gov.
14th Amendment: Later used to incorporate rights to the states.
Puerto Rico & American Territories
Political paradox: U.S. citizens but no full representation in Congress.
Jones-Shafroth Act (1917): Gave Puerto Ricans U.S. citizenship.
Possible Futures:
Status quo
Enhanced commonwealth
Statehood
Independence
Nationalization of Politics
State issues increasingly viewed through a national lens (e.g., abortion, gun control).
Federal vs. state conflicts (e.g., immigration laws, sanctuary cities).
Matters because:
Weakens local control over policy.
Increases polarization—everything seen as a national battle.
Necessary & Proper Clause
Allows Congress to expand powers beyond those explicitly listed in the Constitution.
Basis for implied powers (e.g., creating a national bank, regulating industries).
Expressed vs. Implied Powers
Expressed (Enumerated) Powers: Clearly stated in the Constitution (e.g., declare war, tax).
Implied Powers: Derived from the Necessary & Proper Clause (e.g., national bank, federal agencies).
Reserved/Police Powers & the 10th Amendment
10th Amendment: Powers not given to the federal government are reserved for states.
Police Powers: State authority over health, safety, and welfare (e.g., COVID-19 mandates, education).
Incoherent Federalism (Conflicting State & Federal Laws)
Gonzalez v. Raich (2005): Federal gov. can prohibit marijuana under the Commerce Clause.
Gonzalez v. Oregon (2006): States can legalize assisted suicide, limiting federal intervention.
Marijuana Laws: Some states legalized it, but federal law still classifies it as illegal.
Shows tension between federal & state powers, creating legal gray areas.
Full Faith and Credit Clause
Requires states to respect and recognize legal decisions and public records of other states (e.g., marriage, contracts, court rulings).
Ensures consistency across state lines but has limits (e.g., does not force states to enforce out-of-state criminal laws).
Privileges and Immunities Clause
Prevents states from discriminating against citizens of other states.
Guarantees fundamental rights such as work, travel, and legal protection across state lines.
Exceptions exist (e.g., in-state tuition, professional licensing).
Managerial Decentralization and Structural Federalism
Structural federalism: Traditional division of power between state and federal governments.
Managerial decentralization: Shift where the federal government sets policies but allows states flexibility in administration.
Debat
e: Is federalism eroding into managerial decentralization?
Preemption (Ceiling vs. Floor)
Ceiling preemption (favored by Republicans): Federal law prevents states from setting stricter regulations.
Floor preemption (favored by Democrats): Federal law sets a minimum standard, allowing states to go beyond it.
Example: California’s stricter emissions laws challenged by federal rollbacks.
Medicaid
Covers 42% of American births and accounts for 20% of healthcare spending.
State-administered with federal funding, leading to disparities in coverage.
Reflects broader federalism debate: national uniformity vs. state-level flexibility.
Influences political participation and perceptions of government effectiveness.
Benefits and drawbacks to federalism
Benefits:
Allows for diversity of culture, policy, etc.
States are “laboratories of democracy”
Minimizes conflicts over policy
Neutralizes dangerous factions and other groups
Competition between states
Drawbacks:
Disagreement of fundamental rights across country
Hard to get clear answers to policy problems
Overlapping layers of gov’t and responsibility
State vs. national loyalty
Competition between states, i.e “race to the bottom”
Amazon headquarters
Summary
People identify more with their city/state/religion than the national government
Not really
is is easier to understand local politics than national political because people interact with local politics more often
No, generally people do not know
Local governments should be empowered because it’s closer to the people and people care and understand more about their immediate surroundings
Who is to blame for the state of public education?