COMM3401 - Week 9

Key terms:

  • Emotional support messages: Specific lines communicative behavior enacted by one person with the intent of helping another cope effectively with emotional distress

  • Person-centered messages: The extent to which messages explicitly acknowledge, elaborate, legitimize, and contextualize the feelings and perspective of another person

  • Heuristic: Quick rule of thumb we use to guide our actions


General notes:

I. Emotional suport messages

  • Person-centered

  • Goal - emotional improvement


II. Three levels of Person-centeredness

  • High person-centered messages (HPC)

  • Moderate person-centered messages (MPC)

  • Low person-centered messages (LPC)


III. General Findings and One Question

  • HPC messages do a better job at making others feel better

  • What does person-centeredness not tell us?

    • How and Why do more and less PC messages influence people’s feelings

    • Messages do not MAKE people do/feel things


IV. What are the two dual processes?

  • People evaluate messages they receive

  • Two cognitive processes

    • Elaborate path → sometimes the upset person may scrutinize a message

    • Heuristic path → sometimes people don’t

      • Expectations (from EVT)

      • Pre-conceived beliefs - ex: “women provide good support”


V. Putting together the pieces

  • Key ideas

    • Goal → Emotional improvement

    • It’s not always HPC that’s needed

  • Under what conditions do people use either elaborate or heuristic paths when they process more or less PC messages

    • Motivation

    • Ability

  • HPC might not work

    • Motivation - if distress is very/low

      • If trauma is severe

      • If one doesn’t really care about what happened

    • Ability - if one can’t differentiate among more and less PC messages

      • If one does not know what a HPC message is, they won’t recognize it


VI. Critiques of DPM

  • Pretty complex——not simple

  • Lots of variables and factors

  • In the very beginning stages → not a lot of empirical evidence