M5L3 DNA damage and the immune system
PRRs in innate immunity - best known PRRs = TLRs
Eg. recognition of bacterial cell wall components by TLR4 (interacts with LPS which activates inflammatory genes)
For each PRR, the more general a pathogen component that is recognised, the wider the range of protection
Genetic material is the most general component of pathogens
Pathogen DNA is detected by cGAS which triggers innate immune response
cGAS interacts with pathogen DNA (undergoes allosteric conformational change) and generates cGAMP (second messenger)
cGAMP interacts with STING (a dimer which acts as a signalling platform, stabilised by cGAMP)
Dimers get arranged in an array which help in signalling
STING is an ER membrane bound protein which gets shuttled to the Golgi upon binding to cGAMP
STING activates IKK and more importantly TBK1
Upon cGAMP engagement thgere is a rotation in the molecule relative to the TMD which releases the CTD of STINGto engage/activate TBK1
TBK1 in close proximity due to the array of STING dimers allows them to cross-phosphorylate and activate each other
Active TBK1 activates/phosphorylates IRF3, causing it to dimerise (generates type I interferons eg IFNb) whereas IKK phosphorylates NFkB (generates inflammatory cytokine production)
IGN drives expression of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs)
ISGs have diverse functions - limiting specific pathogen functions, activating adapative immunity, recruiting specific immune cells …
PD-L1 induction by IFN prevents overstimulation of immune response
cGAMP can be transmitted to neighbouring cells via gap junctions, interferons and cytokines are also diffusible
cGAS and STING expression are mildly stimulated by interferon, and expression of other DNA and RNA sensors are also stimulated by interferon (positive feedback)
Turning off signalling
ABCC1 (channel protein) removes cGAMP from intracellular space
Other cGAMP importers (SLC19A1, SLC46A2, LRCC8A) can allow STING to enter back into the same cell or other cells
Secreted ENPP1 converts cGAMP to AMP + GMP to prevent it from being imported back
STING activation also induces its own degradation via autophagy
TREX1 and other nucleases can also degrade DNA which removes the starting substrate for the cGAS pathway
Cancer cells rewire their cGAS-STING signalling
Why is cGAS not constantly activated by self-DNA?
cGAS is in the cytoplasm - however would it be able access chromosomal DNA?
Cytoplasmic cGAS enriches on chromosomes during mitosis
When nuclear envelope breaks down during mitosis then all of it gets ‘soaked up’ by chromosomes so it can be localised to the nucleus after the nuclear membrane reforms
Chromatin is a potential marker for self-DNA, nucleosomes may protect from cGAS binding
cGAS bind nucleosomes with higher affinity than naked DNA which inhibits it
Aicardi-Gutieres and Lupus syndromes - autoinflammatory diseases caused by genetic mutations eg cytoplasmic exonuclease TREX1 and DNA repair enzyme RNase H2
Lethality of TREX1 loss can be rescured by loss of cGAS
DNA damage, genome instability and other stressors can activate cGAS
Causing inflammation, apoptosis, senescence…
Under some conditions it may also drive survival and invasiveness
Depending on the context it may be pro- or anti-cancer
Hypothesis - cGAS may be activated by micronuclei (tiny, nucleus-like structures containing a chromosome fragment or whole chromosome that failed to incorporate into the main daughter nucleus during cell division, forming a small, membrane-bound body)
Micronuclei are a common consequence of chormosomal instability, DNA damage, chromosome mis-segregation, nuclear envelope assembly defects
attractive candidate for cGAS activation upon DNA damage
Micronuclei have fragile nuclear envelopes
Micronuclei accumulate cGAS
However, micronuclei contain chromatin which should inactivate cGAS
Alternative sources of cGAS activation - mitochondrial DNA
Radiotherapy damages not only nuclear DNA but also mitochondria which may activate cGAS
However not all data supports this
Genome instability is generally a poor stimulant of cGAS signalling, but their is evidence that at some point in tumour evolution there is a selection pressure to reduce cGAS signalling (reason unclear)