Lesson 2 Notes: The Road to the Constitution
“we the people give the legitimacy to this governmetn we are forming” we are the ones who are crafting this document, we are the ones
articles of the confederation
june 12, 1776: committee appointed by continental congress to draft a document that later became the articles of confederation
nov 15, 1777: the cc adopted the articles of confederation and sent them to the states for approval
the states hesitated when approving them because they were worried that the central gov would have too much power
march 1, 1781: maryland was last state to approve the articles, America begins under the articles
sep 3, 1783: treaty of paris ends the american revolution
the articles of confederation established a loose confederation of sovereign states that came together for mutual defense and governance, yet lacked a strong central authority.
the articles of confederation created a single national fovernment under congress which wa sa unicameral legislature (no exectuvie or judicial yet)
congress could reate committees to craft policy and department sto handle specific cabine taffairs
congress could create ad hoc courts, but they couldnt handle disputes between states or maritime affairs (aka national affairs?)
congress represented the states, not the people
no national elections, states sent their delegates to congress and that was it. each state had one vote in congress
other things about the powers
the pvotes of 9 states were required to pass all important measures
to amend the articles, all states have to approve the amendemnt
congress powers:
foreign relations
coining money
establishing weights and measures
postal service
disputes between states
admirality/maritime cases
borrow money
submitting requisitions for money and troops from the states
DESPITE the powers of congress, the system established was weak and congress soon became ineffective and couldnt do anything
issues of the articles
congress had no pwoer to tax or regulate commerce
congres scould requrest money from the states, but the states could just refuse and congress couldnt actually do anytjing about it
established a league of friendship but didnt identify its own sovereignty
the revolution was the beginninf ot eh american experiement, the articles of confederation was the “percolating period”
the articles in crisis!!!!
the biggest challenge the articles had to survive was trying to manage the huge debt of the revolutionary war, and trying to get the funds to pay the debt
rhode island alone blocked an amendemnet that woiuld have allowed congress to impose a 5% tariff on foreign imports
new york would late rblock another revenue amnemdent as well
the states began acting like independent countries within their rforeign affairs, incluidng waging war, creating armies, and making foreign treaties
shay’s rebellion - a brief armed rebellion of property owners (farmers) who were suffering from the poor economic situation caused by congress financial inaction
movement toward constitution
conflict at the constitutional convention
the virginia plan
proposed a central government separated into bicameral legislature, exectuive branch, and judicial branch
citizens would be more direvtly represented in congress by electing representatives based on the state’s populationb
congress would have more power
this would also give more power to the larger states and threatened the influence of smaller states
the new jersey plan
congress would be a UNICAMERAL legislature with each state having one vote
proposal by smaller states giving congress taxing and commerce powers and strengthen federal enforcemnt powers ove rstates
basical;y the same structural plan as the virginia plan
hamiltons plan
alexander hamilton proposed a constitutional monarcy but garnered no support
a major issue rose regarding th ecomposition of congress
delegates from the smaller sattes feared domination by larger states in the virginia plan, in which the number of representatives elected to congress was based on the population
in response, the smaller sattes argued for a system in which each state had equal representation
the convention became deadlocked as each side argued
the connecticut compromise
the lower house of congress would have proportional represenation based o the state population (house of rep), while the upper house would have equal representation among the states (the senate)
members of the house of rep would be directly elected by indiviudals in a distrcit
members of the senate would be chosen by state legislatures
all bills for raising or spending money would originate in the lower house, the senate would not be able to amend these bills
constitutional convention: federalism
federal governemtn would be based on the people and have powers provided by the constitution
the states would have police powers to handle internals tate affairs
police power: the power to legslate for the health,s afety, welfare, and morals of the people
madisons proposed clause allowing congress to veto state laws that conflict with federal laws was ultimately dropped and replaced with the supremacy clause
supremacy clause states that the constituion and federal laws are the supreme law of hte land
under the constitution, states were prohibited from coining or printing money, making anything beside gold or silver acceptable in paying debts, and passing laws interfering with contract obligations
constitutional convention: the executive
madison and other delegates were concerned over the concentration of power in a single government body, aka congress
they were also troubled by the abuses state legislatures committed in states with only a single government body
sharing power among the legislative, exective, and judicial branches was nevessaru to be a check on abusive federal governemtn
proposals:
franklin, randolph, and mason - the legislature elects the chief ececutive and executive power would be dispers in an executvie council
madison, hamilton, washington, morris, and wilson - a single executive elected by the people (directly or indirectyl) to check legislative power
anti-federalist argument
believed the constitution granted the federal government too broad and ambiguous powers
main concerns of the anti-federalist
the radical nature of the constitution
anti federalists did want a stronger federal gov but feared losing liberties, state autonomy, and worried about the power congress and other branches mat have
the size and scale of the fedearl government
anti fed believed TRUE republicanism existed at the local state level
argued a large federal gov would result in a divisive politclal situation
wheres the bill of rights????
the federalist argument
arued againast the radical nature
natural result of enlightenment movement
response to size and scale of federal government
the federalist believed individuals were mtoivated by private interest, not public good
they were concerned that the fed goc would be doninated by majoirty rule like they were within the states
solution: “extended repunlic” where majority rule could not form and liberties would be preserved
response to concerns regarding democratic representation
republican representation: federalist theory of indirect representation that would result in responsible leadership not easily influenced by teh changing opinions of the people
would result in preservation of rights sand protect against corruption
response to the absence of the bill of rights
feds believed that the fed gov would be limited to solely the powers granted in the constitution and all other powers would be in people or the states
they also thought the protective provisions in the constitution and the states’ bills of rights would be enough and they didnt need more