Study Notes on Incest Law and Case Law
Definition of Incest
Incest is defined as an unlawful act of having sexual intercourse with a consented relative.
Legal Framework
According to Penal Code Act Cap 128 Section 138:
Subsection (1):
Specifies any person who engages in sexual intercourse with a relative, with the awareness of the familial relationship, commits an offense.
The recognized relationships include:
Mother/Father
Mother’s daughter/Father’s son
Daughter/Son
Father’s mother/Father’s father
Mother’s mother/Mother’s father
Son’s daughter
Daughter’s son
Sister/Brother
Wife’s mother/Husband’s father
Wife’s daughter/Husband’s son
Father’s sister/Father’s brother
Mother’s sister/Mother’s brother
Brother’s daughter/Sister’s son
Sister’s daughter/Son
Father’s brother’s daughter/Father’s son
Mother’s sister’s daughter/Mother’s sister’s son
Son’s wife/Daughter’s husband
Father’s wife/Mother’s husband
Penalty:
Upon conviction, the offender is liable to imprisonment for a term of seven years.
If the offender is under eighteen years of age, the penalty is imprisonment for life.
Subsection (2):
It is noted that sexual intercourse constitutes an offense regardless of consent from the other person.
Subsection (3):
If convicted in relation to a person under the age of twenty-one years, the court may:
Divest the offender of all authority over that person.
Terminate guardianship if the offender is the guardian and appoint another as guardian.
Subsection (4):
The High Court may vary orders made under subsection (3) at any time by appointing a different guardian.
Case Law: Barugahara V Uganda (1969) 1EA 2
The case discusses the conviction of Nserimi Barugahara for incest.
Facts:
The victim’s mother was aged seventeen at the time of her marriage to Barugahara and lived together as husband and wife in Kampala.
The victim was born when the mother returned home to Toro.
When the victim turned twelve, she was brought by Barugahara to live with him.
They lived together under the same roof, during which Barugahara engaged in sexual intimacy with the victim, resulting in her pregnancy.
Defense Argument:
Barugahara argued that the victim’s mother was never his wife.
Court's Ruling:
The court held that the offense of incest is committed regardless of whether the relationship is traced through lawful wedlock.
Legal Requirements for Prosecution
Corroboration Requirement:
It is required that the evidence of a female witness, who may be liable to prosecution for incest, must be corroborated.
Further Legal Provisions
Section 139 of the Penal Code Act Cap 128:
This section further stipulates the ingredients necessary for proving an incest charge.