motion
microstimulation experiment by Movshon and Newsome:
monkey shifted judgment to artificially stimulated direction
perceptual response was integration (vector sum)
integration required to solve “aperture problem”
perceiving moving objects:
aperture problem - observation of small portion of larger stimulus leads to misleading info. about direction of movement
activity of single V1 complex cell or MT cell does not provide accurate info about direction of movement
looking through apertures: our receptors have limited RFs
complex moving stimuli - gratings
present composite plaid and look for cells that correspond to conscious perception
V1- most cells tuned to hor. and vert. are excited, ones tuned to 45 deg. aren’t
MT- most cells tuned to hor. and vert. excited, sub-pop tuned to 45 that are excited
MST- excited to 45 but not hor. and vert.
rules that guide motion correspondence:
proximity
momentum- objects continue going in same direction
hysteresis- given interpretation tends to bias towards that interpretation
cross modal effects can bias correspondence
motion of intersections
must assign motion signals to object
some intersections are incidental (one object in front of other), so intersection does not represent an object
when this occurs, one cannot track the motion of the intersection- need object to assign motion to
induced motion:
if many things moving in one direction a stationary object may appear to move in the opposite direction
bio motion findings:
can identify actions, gender, self, friends, emotions