Urban Planning and Housing: A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Modern Approaches

Mental Blueprints and Cultural Context

  • Mental Image:
    • The concept of a "house" varies greatly among individuals.
    • Even mental images of a house have significantly changed over the past century.
  • Mental Blueprint:
    • Shared mental plans lead to similar-looking neighborhoods.
    • Mental plans are not drawn on paper but exist mentally.
    • These plans have evolved over the last 100 years.
    • Architectural mental plans differ from those of people in slums due to different sociocultural contexts.

A Priori vs. A Posteriori Models

  • Two models: A priori (before) and A posteriori (after).
  • Traditional Medina (pre-20th century):
    • Grew organically based on sociocultural rules.
  • Colonization Impact:
    • Froze the Medina in time.
    • Organic processes ceased; building patterns changed.
  • A Posteriori View:
    • Looking at the Medina now provides only the result, making it hard to understand its origins.
  • A Priori Model:
    • Focuses on understanding how people used to think about their houses, neighborhoods, and cities.
  • Behavioral Model:
    • Tries to understand why people imagine places the way they do.
    • Explores the values, principles, and logic behind these imaginations.
    • Considers socioeconomic pressures and cultural identity as influencing factors.

Synthesizing Urban Forms (A Posteriori Model)

  • Irregular form.
  • Hierarchy of streets (main streets, cul-de-sacs).
    • Constant cul-de-sac ratio of around 35% in North African Medinas, higher than in European cities.
  • Absence of written urban regulations but presence of religious rules (Islamic law) for managing conduct and succession.
    • Social, economic, and legal factors influence urban form.
  • Environmental Factors:
    • Mediterranean climate influences courtyard design for temperature regulation (passive solar design).
  • Emphasis on Privacy:
    • Cul-de-sacs, absence of windows, introverted housing designs.
  • Defense:
    • Convoluted streets for hiding from enemies and protecting neighborhoods.

Bottom-Up vs. Modern Planning

  • Historical Building (Bottom-Up):
    • Each house is different and grows as desired.
    • ConsensusConsensus dictates overall structure.
    • Meta-principles: Shared cultural norms.
    • Individual decision-making is decentralized; homeowners can make their own decisions if they don't harm neighbors.
  • Modern Planning:
    • Central authority (municipality) enforces norms.
    • Decision-making is centralized with a limited number of planners and politicians.
    • Modern urban planning, centralized decision making.

Prohibitive vs. Prescriptive Rules

  • Prohibitive Rule:
    • Freedom to do anything as long as no harm is caused.
    • High adaptability.
  • Prescriptive Rule:
    • Fixed and less adaptable.
    • Requires permission from central authority for changes.
  • Static Norms:
    • Set by central authority.
  • Sensitive Process:
    • Local level decision-making.

Traditional City as A Posteriori Urban Morphology

  • Organic features. Spontaneous and based on patterns.
  • Compact and low-rise.
  • Decentralized with no central authority.
  • Multiple centralities (e.g., around mosques or markets).
  • Capacity for self-organization due to bottom-up processes and prescriptive rules.
  • Emphasis on privacy with defensible spaces and introverted spaces.

A Priori Model: Collective Mental Image

  • Based on how individuals imagine their houses and buildings.
  • Reconstructing this collective image is challenging.
  • Frameworks:
    • Complexity Science:
      • Complexity Science: A field dealing with systems that are uncertain, complex, chaotic, and ambiguous (VUCA).
  • Self-Organizing Systems:
    • Self-governance, self-coordination, self-building.
  • Adaptive:
    • Attractive, small scale, long construction time.
  • Customs:
    • Common customs are based on individual rights and communal responsibilities.
    • Example: Medina doesn't need a plan. Local customs such as street width should be at least the width of two horses.
  • Enforcement of Authority:
    • Checks and balances to ensure no harm is caused or principles are disrespected.

Housing and the Courtyard Archetype

  • Dominant Courtyard House:
    • Common in Morocco and the Southern Mediterranean.
    • Prevalent even in pre-modern and post-colonization periods.
  • Rural Areas:
    • Courtyard typology exists in rural areas with different proportions.
  • Basic Unit: Room (Bit):
    • Rooms around a courtyard.
  • Nomadic Tent:
    • Became more solid, evolving into rural houses and then courtyard houses.
  • Basic Cell: Room:
    • Rooms as cells that form a house, which acts as a living organism.
      Growing and evolving.
      Incremental Planning
  • Cities happen incrementally, step by step.
  • Rooms aggregate and form tissue.
  • Makes it organic.

Informal Housing

  • Step-by-step construction.

Informal Housing (Examples)

  • Example: Douar Doum (near Rabat).
    • Slum created in the 1920s and expanded in the 1960s.
    • People built tents and noualas, sharing a common a priori model.
    • Used local materials like reed, wood, and tin.
  • Transition to Concrete:
    • After independence, people started using more durable materials.
    • Maintained the structure of bits (rooms) and a courtyard house.
  • House Grows:
    • The house grows with people to become a living space.
  • Issues:
    • Houses became five floors high.
    • Caused dysfunction due to lack of sun exposure.

The Importance of a System Correcting Harm

  • Medina:
    • Medina is designed to correct what can be viewed as harmful.
  • Huardom (Poverty and Marginalization):
    • In the context of poverty and marginalization, there is no such system in place.
    • Building five stories provides extra revenue.

Step-by-Step Construction Characteristics

  • More adaptivity.
    • Prohibitive roles.
    • Small scale design.
      From Environment to Recommendation
      Traditional --> Informal --> Concept --> Theories --> Principles to Design Recommendations.

Tokyo: Organic Order

  • Emergence:
    • Simple building rules.
    • Result in order, logic and order in the city.
  • Organic Features:
    • Modern contemporary city that has organic patterns like that of the Medina.
    • Amoeba Like: Cells come together to create a bigger organism.
      *Experiment showed mold created a structure similar to transport system
  • New city rebuilt 1945.
  • Absence of one central plan, and zoning laws.
  • Local projects.
  • Flexibility is important.

Tokyo: Key Points

  • Sky rises next to story buildings, and lack of zoning
  • Sky rises with business, local, and local city are one/two stations away
  • Distinction through chaos creates order
  • Lack of rigid regulations.
  • Invisible grid fixated by economic needs.

Machizukuri: Community-Based Design

  • Participatory, collaborative approach to urban planning.
  • Implemented after World War II.
  • Neighborhood associations communicate with the government about regulations.
  • Mix of formal and informal consensus mechanism.
  • Consensus with Medina and Housing.
  • Blended with spontaneous development and formal regulation creates a good and big city with organic features.

Flexible Regulation

*Flexibility gives:
**Organic Growth
**Mixed use zoning
**Incrementality and small scale.

Key Takeaways

  • Human-centered urbanism
  • Use and reuse of space (Tokyo Common)
  • Bottom-up developments like (Machizukuri)
    Balance of Top - Bottom Building