Urban Planning and Housing: A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Modern Approaches
Mental Blueprints and Cultural Context
- Mental Image:
- The concept of a "house" varies greatly among individuals.
- Even mental images of a house have significantly changed over the past century.
- Mental Blueprint:
- Shared mental plans lead to similar-looking neighborhoods.
- Mental plans are not drawn on paper but exist mentally.
- These plans have evolved over the last 100 years.
- Architectural mental plans differ from those of people in slums due to different sociocultural contexts.
A Priori vs. A Posteriori Models
- Two models: A priori (before) and A posteriori (after).
- Traditional Medina (pre-20th century):
- Grew organically based on sociocultural rules.
- Colonization Impact:
- Froze the Medina in time.
- Organic processes ceased; building patterns changed.
- A Posteriori View:
- Looking at the Medina now provides only the result, making it hard to understand its origins.
- A Priori Model:
- Focuses on understanding how people used to think about their houses, neighborhoods, and cities.
- Behavioral Model:
- Tries to understand why people imagine places the way they do.
- Explores the values, principles, and logic behind these imaginations.
- Considers socioeconomic pressures and cultural identity as influencing factors.
Synthesizing Urban Forms (A Posteriori Model)
- Irregular form.
- Hierarchy of streets (main streets, cul-de-sacs).
- Constant cul-de-sac ratio of around 35% in North African Medinas, higher than in European cities.
- Absence of written urban regulations but presence of religious rules (Islamic law) for managing conduct and succession.
- Social, economic, and legal factors influence urban form.
- Environmental Factors:
- Mediterranean climate influences courtyard design for temperature regulation (passive solar design).
- Emphasis on Privacy:
- Cul-de-sacs, absence of windows, introverted housing designs.
- Defense:
- Convoluted streets for hiding from enemies and protecting neighborhoods.
Bottom-Up vs. Modern Planning
- Historical Building (Bottom-Up):
- Each house is different and grows as desired.
- dictates overall structure.
- Meta-principles: Shared cultural norms.
- Individual decision-making is decentralized; homeowners can make their own decisions if they don't harm neighbors.
- Modern Planning:
- Central authority (municipality) enforces norms.
- Decision-making is centralized with a limited number of planners and politicians.
- Modern urban planning, centralized decision making.
Prohibitive vs. Prescriptive Rules
- Prohibitive Rule:
- Freedom to do anything as long as no harm is caused.
- High adaptability.
- Prescriptive Rule:
- Fixed and less adaptable.
- Requires permission from central authority for changes.
- Static Norms:
- Set by central authority.
- Sensitive Process:
- Local level decision-making.
Traditional City as A Posteriori Urban Morphology
- Organic features. Spontaneous and based on patterns.
- Compact and low-rise.
- Decentralized with no central authority.
- Multiple centralities (e.g., around mosques or markets).
- Capacity for self-organization due to bottom-up processes and prescriptive rules.
- Emphasis on privacy with defensible spaces and introverted spaces.
A Priori Model: Collective Mental Image
- Based on how individuals imagine their houses and buildings.
- Reconstructing this collective image is challenging.
- Frameworks:
- Complexity Science:
- Complexity Science: A field dealing with systems that are uncertain, complex, chaotic, and ambiguous (VUCA).
- Complexity Science:
- Self-Organizing Systems:
- Self-governance, self-coordination, self-building.
- Adaptive:
- Attractive, small scale, long construction time.
- Customs:
- Common customs are based on individual rights and communal responsibilities.
- Example: Medina doesn't need a plan. Local customs such as street width should be at least the width of two horses.
- Enforcement of Authority:
- Checks and balances to ensure no harm is caused or principles are disrespected.
Housing and the Courtyard Archetype
- Dominant Courtyard House:
- Common in Morocco and the Southern Mediterranean.
- Prevalent even in pre-modern and post-colonization periods.
- Rural Areas:
- Courtyard typology exists in rural areas with different proportions.
- Basic Unit: Room (Bit):
- Rooms around a courtyard.
- Nomadic Tent:
- Became more solid, evolving into rural houses and then courtyard houses.
- Basic Cell: Room:
- Rooms as cells that form a house, which acts as a living organism.
Growing and evolving.
Incremental Planning
- Rooms as cells that form a house, which acts as a living organism.
- Cities happen incrementally, step by step.
- Rooms aggregate and form tissue.
- Makes it organic.
Informal Housing
- Step-by-step construction.
Informal Housing (Examples)
- Example: Douar Doum (near Rabat).
- Slum created in the 1920s and expanded in the 1960s.
- People built tents and noualas, sharing a common a priori model.
- Used local materials like reed, wood, and tin.
- Transition to Concrete:
- After independence, people started using more durable materials.
- Maintained the structure of bits (rooms) and a courtyard house.
- House Grows:
- The house grows with people to become a living space.
- Issues:
- Houses became five floors high.
- Caused dysfunction due to lack of sun exposure.
The Importance of a System Correcting Harm
- Medina:
- Medina is designed to correct what can be viewed as harmful.
- Huardom (Poverty and Marginalization):
- In the context of poverty and marginalization, there is no such system in place.
- Building five stories provides extra revenue.
Step-by-Step Construction Characteristics
- More adaptivity.
- Prohibitive roles.
- Small scale design.
From Environment to Recommendation
Traditional --> Informal --> Concept --> Theories --> Principles to Design Recommendations.
Tokyo: Organic Order
- Emergence:
- Simple building rules.
- Result in order, logic and order in the city.
- Organic Features:
- Modern contemporary city that has organic patterns like that of the Medina.
- Amoeba Like: Cells come together to create a bigger organism.
*Experiment showed mold created a structure similar to transport system
- New city rebuilt 1945.
- Absence of one central plan, and zoning laws.
- Local projects.
- Flexibility is important.
Tokyo: Key Points
- Sky rises next to story buildings, and lack of zoning
- Sky rises with business, local, and local city are one/two stations away
- Distinction through chaos creates order
- Lack of rigid regulations.
- Invisible grid fixated by economic needs.
Machizukuri: Community-Based Design
- Participatory, collaborative approach to urban planning.
- Implemented after World War II.
- Neighborhood associations communicate with the government about regulations.
- Mix of formal and informal consensus mechanism.
- Consensus with Medina and Housing.
- Blended with spontaneous development and formal regulation creates a good and big city with organic features.
Flexible Regulation
*Flexibility gives:
**Organic Growth
**Mixed use zoning
**Incrementality and small scale.
Key Takeaways
- Human-centered urbanism
- Use and reuse of space (Tokyo Common)
- Bottom-up developments like (Machizukuri)
Balance of Top - Bottom Building