11-4 BIG DATA | (200) Facebook's role in Brexit — and the threat to democracy | Carole Cadwalladr
Brexit and Ebbw Vale
Background Context
Brexit vote occurred in June 2016, leading to a shock outcome for many Britons.
Author visits Ebbw Vale, South Wales, where he grew up, to understand the high "Leave" vote.
Ebbw Vale's history: A rich working-class culture known for coal mining, steelworks, rugby, and male voice choirs; significant decline followed mining closures in the author’s youth.
Reactions to Brexit Vote
Ebbw Vale's Vote Statistics
Ebbw Vale had a 62% vote to leave the EU.
Author investigates reasons behind this strong support for leaving.
Observation of Economic Changes
Author notes several EU-funded projects in the town:
£33 million college of further education
£350 million regeneration project, including a new sports center.
A £77 million road improvement scheme and a new train line.
Large signs indicating EU funding present throughout town, showcasing the impact of EU investment.
Local Narratives
Interviews with Locals
Encountered townspeople expressing discontent with the EU, stating it had done nothing for them.
Common sentiments included frustration over immigrants and a desire to "take back control."
Notably, the immigration rate in Ebbw Vale is among the lowest in Britain, despite strong anti-immigration sentiment.
Role of Media
Reports indicate that misinformation about immigration was prevalent in right-wing tabloids yet contradicted by local demographics.
The author learns about disinformation on social media, particularly Facebook, affecting public opinion.
Digital Disinformation
Facebook's Dark Influences
Concerns raised about the lack of transparency surrounding Facebook’s advertisements and how campaigns targeted voters.
Lack of archived ads makes it impossible to trace the nature and impact of the misinformation spread.
Parliament's inquiries into Facebook for clarity on advertisement practices remain unanswered, drawing attention to potential electoral fraud.
Electoral Malpractices
Vote Leave Campaign Violations
"Vote Leave" campaign allegedly mismanaged funds by laundering significant amounts through other entities, leading to illegal actions.
Disinformation spread included false claims about Turkey's EU membership.
The referendum's critical effect stemmed from just 1% of the electorate’s votes.
Role of Other Groups
"Leave.EU" campaign, led by Nigel Farage, also accused of illegal activities.
Financial inquiries into Arron Banks’ funding sources hint at potential breaches in laws regarding electoral finances.
International Connections
Similarity with U.S. Elections
Cross connections drawn between Brexit and Donald Trump’s election, suggesting shared tactics and misinformation strategies.
Both the Brexit campaign and Donald Trump’s election utilized social media to spread misinformation.
Cambridge Analytica's data practices played a role in targeting voters' fears, influencing both campaigns.
Strategies included portraying immigrants as threats to jobs and security, despite differing immigration rates in the respective regions.
The use of misleading advertisements aimed at manipulating voter perception and creating emotional responses was prevalent in both contexts.
Emphasis on a global trend of using hate and fear in political campaigning.
Concerns About Technology's Impact on Democracy
Investigative Reporting Evolution
Author transformed from feature writer to investigative reporter to uncover the extent of misinformation affecting the Brexit vote, notably through interviewing a former Cambridge Analytica employee.
Cambridge Analytica linked to illicit data practices, with a focus on profiling voter fears to influence campaigns.
Defiance Against Legal Threats
Journalistic integrity upheld amidst legal threats from Facebook and Cambridge Analytica, highlighting the need for transparency in the digital age.
Call to Action for Silicon Valley
Addressing Tech Giants
The author delivers a message to the leaders of major technology companies to recognize their role in the degradation of democracy.
Highlights historical parallels regarding the dangers of unseen forces, like the silent gas in coal mines, serving as a metaphor for modern electoral manipulation through technology.
Concludes that democratic systems have been compromised due to technological advancements outpacing regulatory frameworks.