Cambridge International Education Thinking Skills AS & A Level
SECTION 1 — PROBLEM‑SOLVING SKILLS
Below, each syllabus skill is turned into:
Definition
Example
Short supporting line from the syllabus (quoted)
1.1 Organise Information
Understand information in various forms
Definition: Ability to interpret information presented as text, tables, charts, or diagrams.
Example: A bus timetable (table) + a route map (diagram) + a paragraph describing delays (text) → you combine all to choose the best bus.
Syllabus line: “Understand information presented as text, tables and diagrams.”
Extract relevant information
Definition: Selecting only the information needed to solve the problem.
Example: A word problem mentions ages, names, and prices, but the question asks only for total cost → ignore ages and names.
Syllabus line: “Extract the information that is relevant to the problem to be solved.”
Extract data from related data sets
Definition: Combining information from multiple sources to solve a problem.
Example: One table shows hourly pay; another shows hours worked → combine to calculate weekly pay.
Syllabus line: “Extract data from related data sets that can be combined…”
1.2 Understand logical relationships
Simple models
Definition: A rule or system showing how inputs produce outputs.
Example: Taxi fare = $3 + $1.50 per km.
Syllabus line: “Simple models may be described as instructions for calculations…”
Necessary and sufficient conditions
Necessary: Must be true for something to happen.
Example: Having a ticket is necessary to board a plane.
Sufficient: Guarantees the result by itself.
Example: Scoring 100% is sufficient to pass an exam.
Syllabus line: “Identify necessary and sufficient conditions.”
Deduce information from processed data
Definition: Using summaries (averages, totals, graphs) to infer properties of original data.
Example: If average score is 95% with low variation, most students scored high.
Syllabus line: “Deduce some information about the original data.”
SECTION 2 — PROCESS INFORMATION
2.1 Perform operations
Use information appropriately
Definition: Choosing and performing the correct calculations or steps.
Example: Multiply price × quantity to find total cost.
Syllabus line: “Use one or more items of information appropriately…”
Apply a model
Definition: Substitute real values into a given rule or formula.
Example: Cost = 3 + 1.5×10 = 18.
Syllabus line: “Apply a model to a given situation.”
2.2 Identify cases that satisfy criteria
Search through possible solutions
Definition: Checking all options to find those that meet every condition.
Example: From a list of students, choose those over 16 and with perfect attendance.
Syllabus line: “Search through all possible solutions… to identify those which satisfy given criteria.”
Identify unmet criteria
Definition: Spotting which rule a proposed solution breaks.
Example: A schedule fits all lessons but violates “no lessons after 5 pm.”
Syllabus line: “Identify criteria that have not been met…”
2.3 Make appropriate deductions
Definition: Drawing new conclusions from given information.
Example: If A > B and B > C, then A > C.
Syllabus line: “Draw conclusions based on the information available.”
SECTION 3 — ANALYSE DATA
3.1 Transform data
Recognise alternative representations
Definition: Seeing that different formats show the same data.
Example: A bar chart and a pie chart showing the same proportions.
Syllabus line: “Recognise alternative representations of a set of information.”
Identify features of a model from representations
Definition: Interpreting graphs/tables to understand model behaviour.
Example: Gradient of a distance–time graph = speed.
Syllabus line: “Interpret the gradient appropriately in the context of the model.”
3.2 Explain trends
Suggest explanations for trends
Definition: Giving plausible reasons for patterns or changes.
Example: Sales rise in December → holiday shopping.
Syllabus line: “Suggest possible explanations for trends…”
Fit a model to information
Definition: Adjusting a formula so it matches data.
Example: Taxi prices → deduce fixed fee + per‑km rate.
Syllabus line: “Deduce the values for… parameters so that the model fits…”
SECTION 4 — CONSIDER WIDER PROBLEMS
4.1 Impact of a change
Definition: Considering how a scenario change affects your solution.
Example: Road closure increases travel time → adjust schedule.
Syllabus line: “Consider the implications of a change…”
4.2 Develop a model
Identify features to include
Definition: Deciding which real‑world factors must be represented.
Example: Rush‑hour traffic in a travel‑time model.
Syllabus line: “Identify features… which need to be included.”
Adjust a model
Definition: Modifying the model to better match reality.
Example: Add peak‑time surcharge to fare model.
Syllabus line: “Adjust a model to incorporate additional features.”
SECTION 5 — EVALUATE & USE EVIDENCE
5.1 Evaluate evidence
Credibility
Definition: How believable evidence is.
Example: A peer‑reviewed study is more credible than an anonymous blog.
Syllabus line: “Assess credibility of evidence – reliability, plausibility…”
Reliability
Definition: Trustworthiness of the source.
Example: A trained observer is more reliable than a distant witness.
Plausibility
Definition: Whether the claim itself seems likely.
Example: “People need sleep” is plausible; “humans don’t need sleep” is not.
Corroboration & consistency
Corroboration: Two sources support each other.
Consistency: They do not contradict.
Example: Two surveys showing similar results.
Representativeness
Definition: Whether a sample reflects the population.
Example: Surveying only teenagers does not represent all adults.
Syllabus line: “Representativeness could be affected if the sample shares a characteristic…”
Assess presentation of data
Definition: Checking for misleading graphs/tables.
Example: A truncated y‑axis exaggerates differences.
5.2 Use evidence
Assess explanation
Definition: Judging whether an explanation fits all evidence.
Example: An explanation that ignores half the data is weak.
Assess inference
Definition: Checking whether a conclusion logically follows.
Example: “Some students cheat → all students cheat” is invalid.
Suggest explanation
Definition: Proposing a plausible cause.
Example: Sales drop → new competitor entered market.
Suggest inference
Definition: Drawing a reasonable conclusion from evidence.
Example: 90% satisfaction → product is well‑received.
Form a judgement
Definition: Combining multiple sources to reach a conclusion.
Example: Reading several studies before judging a policy.
SECTION 6 — ANALYSE REASONING
6.1 Structure of arguments
Recognise an argument
Definition: Identifying when reasons support a conclusion.
Example: “Ban cars because they cause pollution.”
Key elements
Main conclusion — the main claim
Example: “Therefore, we should raise wages.”
Intermediate conclusion — supports another conclusion
Reason — supports a conclusion
Counter‑assertion — opposing claim
Counter‑argument — reasoned objection
Example — specific case supporting a claim
Evidence — data/statistics/expert opinion
Syllabus line: “Key elements: main conclusion, intermediate conclusion, reason…”
Unstated assumption
Definition: A hidden step required for the argument to work.
Example: “Close the park because it’s dangerous” assumes closing it reduces danger.
SECTION 7 — EVALUATE REASONING (FLAWS)
Each flaw includes definition + example.
Equivocation: Switching meaning of a word.
Example: “Feathers are light → feathers can’t be dark.”Conflation: Treating different concepts as identical.
Example: Legal = moral.Circular argument: Conclusion used as a reason.
Example: “He’s honest because he tells the truth.”Begging the question: Assuming what must be proved.
Example: “Games are harmful because they’re bad.”Invalid deduction: Incorrect logic.
Example: “Ground is wet → it must have rained.”Causal flaw: Assuming correlation = causation.
Example: Ice cream sales cause drowning.Rash generalisation: Too little evidence.
Example: “Two rude teens → all teens rude.”Sweeping generalisation: Ignoring exceptions.
Example: “Exercise is good → everyone must run daily.”False dichotomy: Only two options given.
Example: “Support this law or hate safety.”Confusing necessary/sufficient:
Example: “Degree required → degree guarantees job.”Slippery slope: Claiming inevitable disaster.
Example: “Phones in class → no learning at all.”Ad hominem: Attacking person.
Example: “Don’t trust her argument; she failed school.”Tu quoque: “You do it too.”
Example: “You litter, so you can’t criticise me.”Straw man: Misrepresenting opponent.
Example: “Regulate social media → ban free speech.”
SECTION 8 — WEAKNESSES IN REASONING
Support too weak: Evidence supports only part of conclusion.
Inconsistency: Contradictory statements.
Reliance on weak assumption: Unsupported claim used as reason.
Irrelevant appeal: Celebrity endorsement, popularity, emotion.
Weak analogy: Few relevant similarities.
Failure to respond to counter: Ignoring obvious objections.
SECTION 9 — CONSTRUCT REASONING
Articulate a conclusion
Provide reasons
Develop strands
Use intermediate conclusions
Strengthen with:
counter‑argument + response
examples
evidence
analogy
hypothetical reasoning
SECTION 10 — COMMAND WORDS
Command Word | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
Analyse | Examine in detail; identify relationships | Analyse a graph’s trends |
Assess | Make a judgement | Assess effectiveness of a policy |
Calculate | Work out using numbers | Calculate average speed |
Compare | Identify similarities/differences | Compare two arguments |
Evaluate | Judge quality/value | Evaluate reasoning |
Explain | Say why/how with clarity | Explain why trend changes |
Give | Provide short answer | Give one reason |
Identify | Name/select | Identify main conclusion |
Justify | Support with reasons/evidence | Justify your answer |
Predict | Suggest what may happen | Predict next value |
State | Express clearly | State the formula |
Suggest | Propose valid ideas | Suggest an improvement |
SECTION 11 — ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES
AO1: Understand information and relationships
AO2: Evaluate/process information to draw conclusions
AO3: Suggest explanations, construct arguments, devise methods
SECTION 12 — FORMULAS & METHODS
12.1 Distance–Rate–Time
Distance=Rate×Time
Rate=DistanceTime
Time=DistanceRate
Example:
Speed = 50 km/h, time = 3 h → distance = 150 km.
12.2 Area
Rectangle
A=length×width
Example: 5 × 3 = 15.
Square
A=side2
Example: side 4 → 16.
Triangle
A=12×base×height
Example: ½ × 8 × 4 = 16.
12.3 Perimeter
Rectangle
P=2(length+width)
Square
P=4×side
Triangle
P=a+b+c
12.4 Algebra — expressions & equations
Expression: No equals sign
“Three more than twice x” → 2x+3
Equation: Has equals sign
“Twice x plus 3 equals 11” → 2x+3=11
12.5 Substitution method
Rearrange one equation
Substitute into the other
Solve
Substitute back
Example:
x+y=10,2x−y=4
→ y=10−x
→ substitute → solve → find both values.