6a. Interspecific Competition
mutualism: interactions that benefit both populations
commensalism: one species benefits and the other is neither benefited or harmed (epiphytes)
predation: killing and consuming of prey
parasitism: organism (parasite) lives or on another (host) from which it obtains food
interspecific competition: adverse effects on both populations
ecological character displacement: unusual dissimilarity among sympatric species relative to allopatric, in features such as body size or resource utilization
ecological compression: when a species successfully colonizes a new area, realized niche of some already established species is restricted further
ecological release: species realized niche expands in absence of competitors
- do not exist alone in nature
- interspecific competition develops when a resource needed by both populations is in limited supply
- individuals within a population experience intraspecific competition = with members of their own species = notion of K in logistic growth
- but individuals also experience interspecific competition = with other species * to greater or lesser extent
realized niche: niche without considering competitors
fundamental niche: niche considering competitors
Lotka-Volterra
- model was derived independently by Lotka and Volterra
- describes a situation in which there is non predatory competition between two species for a limited resource
- based on logistic growth
- two species living in the same space affect each other
- one species does not equal the other species, we need a conversion factor
- alpha = conversion factor for expressing species 2 in terms of species 1
- beta = conversion factor for expressing species 1 in terms of species 2
- all the space for species 1 is used up when there * K1 individuals of species 1 * K1/alpha individuals of species * a combination of species 1 and 2 that puts species 1 on its zero isocline = not growing
- only three outcomes are possible * both species coexist * species 1 becomes extinct * species 2 becomes extinct
- in a situation where neither species has a very strong effect on the other, we might expect them to coexist * these ideas can be explored mathematically or graphically * superimose both zero isoclines and add vector arrows * four possible outcomes
N1 wins
- no equilibrium because species 1 is able to increase in a zone where species 2 other must decline
- leads to extinction of species 2
N2 wins
- no equilibrium because species 2 is able to increase in a zone where species 1 must decline
- leads to extinction of species 1
Stable Equilibrium
- if diagonal isoclines cross, their equilibrium point may result in a stable equilibrium * vector lines directed towards intersection point
Unstable equilibrium
- in this case, the equilibrium is unstable * sensitive to initial numbers of both species * mutual non-invadability * vector arrows point away from the equilibrium point
Natural Populations
- Elton (1927) * The niche of an animal means its place in the biotic environment - role of animals in the environment * ex. large carnivore niche * ex. arboreal herbivore
- Niche (2008) * range of conditions necessary for persistence of the species, and its ecological role in the ecosystem
- Gause (1934) * as a result of competition, two similar species scarcely ever occupy really similar niches * for two species to coexist, they must possess ecological differences * Lotka-Volterra: too much niche overlap = extinction of one species
Competitive Exclusion Principle
Competitive exclusion principle: complete competitors cannot coexist
Field naturalists were the first to question competitive exclusion principle
closely related species are often seen living in the same habitat (warblers, small mammals)
ecological paradox of competition: How can we reconcile extinction of competitors in lab and coexistence of competitors in field
MacArthur found that they fed in different canopy posts and had slightly different nesting dates
Resource Partitioning
- species sharing same habitat can coexist by utilizing different resources * ex. diff food size * ex. diff times * ex. diff areas
- one species, no competitor, utilizing a resource, seeds of various sizes
- second species enters this area, and its resource utilization curve shows overlap, then we have interspecific competition
- this overlap can force a reduced range of resource use and direct competition will be reduced
- two species will coexist
- ecological character displacement allows coexistence by causing species to use environment differently
- ecological compression
- ecological release
- when species is without competitors, it occupies the largest possible ecological niche = fundamental
- competition causes a population to function within a realized niche
\ \ \