DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY (1)
PSYCHOPATHOLOGY → the study of psychological disorders
ABNORMAL → deviation from the average/norm (any rare behaviour or ability is deemed to be abnormal; however, it is difficult to define what is abnormal as the norms are always changing)
~STATISTICAL INFREQUENCY~
Behaviours that are statistically rare should be seen as abnormal
Any anomaly (about 5% if the population) are perceived as being abnormal
Measured using numbers - how many times we observe a phenomenon
Relies on behaviours we regularly partake in
(e.g. IQ test - average IQ = 100, 2% have a score below 70 therefore receiving a diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder)
EVALUATION
+ REAL-WORLD APPLICATION
One strength of statistical infrequency is its usefulness.
Statistical infrequency is used in clinical practice, both as a means to assess and diagnose psychological disorders.
For example, the Beck Depression Inventory is used to assess depression. A score of 30+ indicates severe depression.
This shows that the value of the statistical infrequency criterion is useful in diagnostic and assessment processes.
- UNUSUAL CHARACTERISTICS CAN BE POSITIVE
One limitation of statistical infrequency is that infrequent characteristics can be positive as well as negative.
For every person with an IQ below 70, there is another with an IQ above 130. Yet we would not consider someone with a high IQ to be abnormal.
This example shows that being unusual or at one end of a psychological spectrum does not necessarily make someone abnormal.
This means that statistical infrequency is never sufficient as the sole base for defining abnormality.
~DEVIATION FROM SOCIAL NORMS~
Behaviour that varies from the norm is seen as abnormal
This draws a line between socially desirable and undesirable behaviours
However, there is no universal culture from which norms are produced
Cultures are also subject to change, and thus the deviation from the norms are only abnormal depending on culture and time
(e.g. a person with antisocial personality disorder is impulsive, aggressive and irresponsible)
EVALUATION
+ REAL-WORLD APPLICATION
One strength of deviation from social norms is its usefulness.
Deviation from social norms is used in clinical practice. For example, the key defining characteristic of antisocial personality disorder is the failure to conform to culturally acceptable behaviour.
These signs of the disorder are all deviations from social norms. Such norms also play a part in the diagnosis of of schizotypal personality disorder, where the term ‘strange’ is used to characterise the thinking, behaviour and appearance of people with the disorder.
This shows that the deviation from social norms criterion has value in psychiatry.
- CULTURAL AND SITUATION RELATIVISM
One limitation of deviation from social norms is the variability between social norms in different cultures.
A person from one cultural group may label someone from another group as abnormal using their standards rather than the person’s standards.
For example, the experience of hearing voices is the norm in some cultures (as messages from ancestors), but would be seen as abnormal in most parts of the UK.
This means that it is difficult to judge deviation from social norms across different cultures.