3. mash filters modern design to modern mash filters at the final compression
Design Improvements in Brewing
Material Transition
Shift from cast iron to plastic for plates and frames.
Benefits:
Lighter operation
Reduced heat losses
Filtration Enhancements
New filter clots made of monofilament polypropylene instead of cotton twill.
Advantages:
Longer lifespan
Easier cleaning
Reduced labor costs
Milling Systems
Types of Milling Systems
Hammer mills
Mura Hydromill
Zeman Dispacks
Grinding and Extraction
Provides finer grind leading to greater extraction yield.
Features a thinner filtration bed which limits long filtration cycles.
Effective sparge water use improves rinsing of spent grains.
Levels of Automation
Automation options include:
Plate opening
Grate discharge
Cleaning processes
Lower oxygen pickup possible through operating system.
Filter Operation in MASH Filters
Parallel Operation
MASH filter elements/modules function in parallel, utilizing a hydraulic ram to maintain pressure between frames and plates.
Chamber Functionality
Spent grains held by plates with rubber gaskets creating alternating chambers for wort filtration.
Wort collected simultaneously from each chamber.
Advantages of Mesh Filters
Membrane Compression
Added compression capabilities compared to traditional mesh designs.
Benefits of Enhanced Compression
Greater wort recovery
Increased yield compared to louder ton systems.
Requires less water, generating fewer last runnings and decreased wastewater production.
Spent grains result in lower moisture content, beneficial for transport as animal feed.
Craft Brewer Reports
Example from Coachella Valley Brewing
60% less water usage compared to traditional methods.
95-98% mash efficiency using a 20-barrel brew house producing 7,500 barrels annually.
Tennessee Craft Brewery Report
25-50% water savings in filtration.
Due to improved wort recovery and cleaning efficiency.
Operational Sequence for Modern Mash Filters
Preparation of Filter
Warm-up using hot water.
Filling
Mash pumped into filter with slight counter pressure (~0.2 bar).
First wort begins running off as pressure builds.
Maintain pressure around 0.4 to 0.5 bar during initial filling.
First Compression
Following first wort collection, compressed air applied to membranes to squeeze grains.
Pressure applied at about 0.5 to 0.6 bar, reducing grain bed thickness by 25%.
Sparging
Hot sparge water introduced at the bottom, filling voids created by compression.
Running off of second wort occurs for about 50 minutes under ~0.6 bar pressure, targeting gravity of around 1-1.5 degrees Plato.
Final Compression
Additional compressed air applied during final compression to extract more wort, using pressure of ~0.8 bar.
Resultant solids in spent grains at approximately 25-30%.
Cycle Efficiency
Total processing time of 100-110 minutes enables 12 brews per day.
Example: Tennessee Brew Works generates 3-4 batches in 10-12 hours, indicating labor and energy savings.