Global Impact and Epidemiology of Monkeypox (Mpox)
Definition and Classification: Monkeypox (mpox) is a viral zoonosis caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), which is a member of the Orthopoxvirus genus within the Poxviridae family.
2022 Outbreak Statistics: Since May 2022, a global outbreak of mpox clade IIb has spread across six continents.
* Case Count: As of March 5, 2024, more than 94,000 cases have been reported.
* Geographic Reach: Cases identified in 118 countries.
* Mortality:178 fatalities recorded globally.
Treatment Challenges: There is a notable scarcity of targeted antiviral interventions, particularly for immunocompromised individuals. Passive immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) is a promising therapeutic alternative.
Orthopoxvirus Structure and Antigenic Cross-Reactivity
Sequence Similarity: MPXV shares high sequence similarity with other orthopoxviruses, including the variola virus (VARV/smallpox) and vaccinia virus (VACV).
Protective Cross-Reactivity: The VACV vaccine, used to eradicate smallpox, provides approximately 85% protection against MPXV due to low polymorphism in surface antigens.
Infectious Virion Forms:
* Mature Virions (MVs): These remain inside the host cell until cell lysis occurs and are primary drivers of host-to-host transmission.
* Enveloped Virions (EVs): Created when mature viruses are encapsulated by late endosomal membranes; these facilitate cell-to-cell infection within a host.
Neutralization Targets:
* MV Targets: Key proteins include A27, L1R, H3L, and D8.
* EV Targets: Primarily A33R and B5R.
Specific Study Homologs:
* M1R: An MPXV protein with approximately 98% sequence similarity to the VACV L1R protein (involved in cell entry and membrane fusion).
* B6R: An MPXV protein with approximately 95%−96% sequence similarity to the VACV B5R protein (involved in virus packaging).
Methodology: Protein Expression, Immunization, and Sequencing
Protein Synthesis: Based on the MPXV genome sequence responsible for the USA outbreak (MPXV_USA_2022_MA001, GenBank: ON563414.3).
* B6R Protein: Extracellular portion (amino acids 20–275).
* M1R Protein: Extracellular portion (amino acids 1–185).
Expression System: Solubilized proteins (excluding transmembrane domains) ligated into pET-25b(+) vectors and expressed in BL21 receptor cells. Induction was achieved using 0.5mM isopropyl-\beta-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) for 16h at 20∘C.
Mice and Immunization:
* Subject: Six-week-old female BALB/c mice.
* Protocol: Subcutaneous immunization four times with 2-week intervals.
* Dosage:50μg of recombinant M1R or B6R protein per mouse.
Antibody Production: Spleen cells were fused with Sp2/0 cells to create hybridomas three days after the final immunization.
Sequencing and Characterization: Total RNA extracted using the FastPure Cell/Tissue Total RNA Isolation Kit. Complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) were verified using IMGT/V-QUEST.
Identification and In Vitro Activity of Monoclonal Antibodies
Identified Antibodies:
* M1R-specific: M1H11, M3B2, M4B6, and M13H.
* B6R-specific: B7C9, B7E2, and B10D3.
Binding Efficacy (ELISA): M3B2 and B7C9 showed the strongest binding to inactivated VACV (Tian Tan) lysate. M1H11, M3B2, and M4B6 reacted robustly with the M1R protein.
Neutralization Potential:
* MV Neutralization: M1H11 and M3B2 were most effective against the MV form.
* EV Neutralization: Only B7C9 exhibited effective neutralizing activity against the EV form.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Affinities: M1H11 and M3B2 demonstrated higher affinities for M1R compared to B7C9’s affinity for B6R.
Structural Modeling and Epitope Prediction
Molecular Docking (AlphaFold2/ZDOCK/ClusPro 2.0):
* M1R Structure: Consists of an \alpha-helical bundle packed against a pair of \beta-sheets. Disulfide bonds: Cys34-Cys57, Cys49-Cys136, and Cys116-Cys158.
* M1H11 Interaction: Binds to \alpha1, \alpha2, and \alpha4 helices of M1R through polar interactions from CDR1 and CDR3 (heavy chain) and CDR1 and CDR2 (light chain).
* M3B2 Interaction: Involves \beta1, \beta3, \alpha5, and the \alpha4-\beta3 linker. All CDRs except light chain CDR2 participate via hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions.
* B6R Structure: Consists of 4 consecutive complement control protein (CCP) domains and a C-terminal transmembrane helix. Includes 8 pairs of disulfide bonds.
* B7C9 Interaction: Binds to CCP2 and CCP3 domains of B6R through heavy chain CDR1/3 and light chain CDR1 interactions.
Alanine Scanning Validation: Identified D66 as the critical epitope on M1R for M1H11 binding.
Therapeutic Efficacy in Mouse Challenge Models
VACV (Tian Tan) Challenge:
* Dosage:2.5×105TCID50.
* Treatment:10mg/kg administered 12h post-challenge.
* Observations: All treated mice survived. The M1H11 & M3B2 cocktail produced the most significant reduction in lung viral load and weight loss compared to individual mAbs or other cocktail combinations.
* Lung Pathology: Control mice showed lost alveolar structure and granulocyte infiltration. Cocktail-treated groups showed significantly alleviated inflammation.
MPXV Challenge:
* Dosage:5×105TCID50.
* Treatment:5mg/kg administered 24h post-challenge.
* Observations: Bis-M1M3 (the bispecific antibody) significantly reduced mortality, viral load, and weight loss, outperforming the cM1H11 & cM3B2 cocktail.
Engineering and Performance of Bis-M1M3 Bispecific Antibody
Design: Human-mouse chimeric M1H11 (cM1H11) served as the framework. The single-chain fragment variable (scFv) of M3B2 was linked to the cM1H11 Fc region using a (G4S)3 linker.
Binding Affinity: Bis-M1M3 yielded a KD value of 1.47×10−10M via SPR, indicating high affinity.
Neutralization Efficacy: The IC50 of Bis-M1M3 and MPXV was lower than that of cM1H11 alone or the cM1H11 & cM3B2 cocktail, suggesting superior in vitro neutralization potency.
Neutralization Mechanisms and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics
Timing of Neutralization:
* Pre-incubation Group: Strong neutralizing activity observed when antibodies and viruses were mixed 1h before infection.
* Post-infection Group: Neutralizing effects were significantly diminished when antibodies were added after the virus had already entered the cells.
* Conclusion: The mAbs and Bis-M1M3 primarily work by impeding viral entry into the host cell.
Pharmacokinetics (Rhesus Macaque Model):
* Subjects:8 male rhesus macaques (n=4 per antibody group).
* Administration: Single Intravenous infusion at 10mg/kg.
* Half-life: Bis-M1M3 recorded an in vivo half-life of 5.142 days, which is comparable to standard control mAbs (e.g., influenza antibody 12G6).
Discussion of Clinical Potential and Future Research
EV Resistance: The study noted that B6R-specific mAbs (targeting EVs) show lower neutralization than M1R-specific mAbs (targeting MVs). This is likely because low antigen density on EVs allows them to escape direct antibody binding.
Conformational Epitopes: Hybridoma testing with short peptides failed, suggesting M1H11 and M3B2 recognize discontinuous conformational epitopes rather than linear sequences.
Future Directions: The researchers plan to use cryo-electron microscopy to generate precise structures of these antibodies and conduct further efficacy studies in non-human primates to advance clinical translation potential.