HR Planning, Forecasting, Turnover & Recruitment Notes
Planning, Job Analysis, and Design
Focus: planning human resources, forecasting, job analysis, and different approaches to job design.
KSAOs: Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Other characteristics used in job analysis and design.
Job Analysis Tools discussed:
Job Element Inventory (JEI)
Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ)
Fleishman System
Occupational Information Network (O*NET)
Job Analysis Review covered to connect analysis with planning and design.
Job Design Review covered four major approaches:
Motivational Approach: intrinsic motivation and job characteristics
Mechanistic Approach: redesign for speed and efficiency
Biological Approach: reduce physical fatigue and health problems
Perceptual–Motor Approach: focuses on mental capacities and limitations
What we plan to do (Planning)
Key questions:
What kind of human resources do we have?
What kind are we likely to need?
How do we align them? Which positions will we fill and how?
Forecasting (planning for supply and demand)
Purpose: determine supply and demand for human resources to predict labor shortages or surpluses.
Two main methods:
Demand forecasting
Supply forecasting
Demand Forecasting
Questions: How much labor will we need?
Methods:
Benchmarking: compare with similar businesses; assess differences
Statistical methods: e.g., historical sales/labor demand correlation next year
Educated guesses: consider new product launches, competitive moves, etc.
Supply Forecasting
Questions: How much labor will we have?
Focus: movement of people within the company (up, through, out) and external environment.
Environmental questions to consider:
What’s the unemployment rate?
Breakdown by age, gender, background of the people we would target
Seasonality in unemployment
Transition Matrix: a key tool in Supply Forecasting
Concept: Lists job categories held in one period (e.g., Sales Manager) and shows the proportion moving to each category in the future, including leaving the company (Exit).
Purpose: answers two questions – where did people go from a given job, and where did people come from into a given job?
Example (illustrative simplified version with categories A–E and Exit):
Rows = 2023 job category; Columns = destination categories in 2024 (A, B, C, D, E, Exit).
Each row sums to 1.0 (100%).
P = egin{pmatrix}
0.60 & 0.14 & 0.20 & 0.06 & 0.00 & 0.00\
0.12 & 0.60 & 0.08 & 0.20 & 0.00 & 0.00\
0.05 & 0.05 & 0.60 & 0.10 & 0.10 & 0.10\
0.80 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.20\
0.20 & 0.60 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.20
right)
ext{(A, B, C, D, E, Exit destinations)}
Documentation example flows (from the transcript):
Initial headcounts (2023): A=50, B=75, C=100, D=200, E=300 → Total 725.
Flows (counts in parentheses):
From A: 30 stay in A; 7 to B; 10 to C; 3 to Exit.
From B: 9 to A; 45 stay in B; 6 to D; 15 to Exit.
From C: 5 to A; 5 to B; 60 stay in C; 10 to D; 10 to E; 10 to Exit.
From D: 160 to A; 40 to Exit.
From E: 60 to A; 180 to B; 60 to Exit.
Resulting transition probabilities reflect movement year-over-year between job categories and exits.
Turnover insights from the matrix (example interpretation)
Turnover counts (exits) by job 2023→2024:
Job A: Exit = 3 out of 50 → turnover ≈ rac{3}{50} = 0.06 = 6 rac{1}{2} ext{?} ≈ 6
Job B: Exit = 15 out of 75 → turnover = 20%
Job C: Exit = 10 out of 100 → turnover = 10%
Job D: Exit = 40 out of 200 → turnover = 20%
Job E: Exit = 60 out of 300 → turnover = 20%
Overall turnover ratio (from sums provided): roughly Turnover ext{ rate} \approx rac{3+15+10+40+60}{725} = rac{128}{725} \approx 0.1765 \,\approx \,18\%.
Which job has the lowest turnover? Job A (≈ 6%).
What we can learn from this matrix
Movement patterns reveal potential career paths and dead-ends (e.g., some jobs feed others more than they exit).
Identify high-exit points and consider HR policy changes to reduce unwanted exits.
Use to forecast headcount needs in different roles and plan development or succession accordingly.
Forecasting: Surplus vs. Shortage and corrective tactics
Forecasting results: Compare demand vs. supply to determine surplus or shortage.
If Supply > Demand: SURPLUS
If Supply < Demand: SHORTAGE
Correcting a surplus (quick summary of tactics)
Speed vs. Suffering vs. severity (from the slides):
Downsizing — Fast; High suffering
Pay reduction — Fast; High suffering
Demotions — Fast; High suffering
Work sharing — Fast; Moderate suffering
Hiring freeze — Slow; Low suffering
Natural attrition — Slow; Low suffering
Early retirement — Slow; Low suffering
Early retirement programs
Rationale: aging workforce; respond to surplus with voluntary exits.
Typical program: two weeks pay for every year of employment + continued healthcare plans for 18+ months + outplacement support.
Pros/cons: some employees welcome this; others find it complicated and emotional.
Downsizing (detailed section)
Definition: Planned elimination of large numbers of personnel to enhance competitiveness.
Common approaches: firing, layoff, attrition, transfer, job sharing, reduced workweek, early retirement.
Effects of downsizing:
Employee uncertainty and fear; impact on culture; rumors escalate.
Survivor syndrome: remaining employees may become risk-averse or isolated.
What about downsizing in practice?
85% of Fortune 1000 firms downsized between 1987–2001 for cost reduction, technology adoption, decreased bureaucracy, or to pave way for foreign labor; 80% of these firms were profitable at the time of layoffs.
Reasons for downsizing (AMA survey results):
Reduced expenses; increased profits (46% achieving reduced expenses; 32% increased profits)
Improved cash flow; increased productivity (24%/22%)
Increased ROI and competitive advantage; reduced bureaucracy; improved decision making; increased customer satisfaction; increased sales and market share; improved product quality; other rationale (technological advances, innovation, avoidance of takeovers).
Important caveats: wrong people fired, loss of organizational memory, survivor effects, culture/climate damage; use with caution.
Shortages: how to correct a shortage
Tactics (with speed and revocability):
Overtime — Fast; High revocability
Temporary workers — Fast; High revocability
Outsourcing — Fast; High revocability
Retrained transfers — Slow; High revocability
Turnover reduction — Slow; Moderate revocability
New external hires — Slow; Low revocability
Technology change — Slow; Low revocability
Temporary workers (overview)
About 5–10% of the workforce are temporary employees (seasonal, temps, contract workers).
Advantages:
Saves benefits costs
Reduces need for selection and training
Brings in employees with diverse experiences
Disadvantages:
Potential friction with regular employees
Risk of creating a two-tier system; may limit extra-role behaviors
Outsourcing (and offshoring)
Benefits: quick solution, revocable; cost savings on benefits; reduces need for hiring and training; can leverage economies of scale; may bring in new capabilities from other firms.
Costs/risks: loss of control over performance management; possible long-term economic effects; may harm employee morale; cybersecurity risks; can contribute to offshoring overseas (offshoring = form of outsourcing where functions move to another country).
Offshoring: a special case of outsourcing where jobs are moved to another country.
Summary: Outsourcing has evolved from a crisis-response tactic to a long-term work-structure strategy.
The human side of HR: careers, ethics, and brand
A candid reminder: "A human resources career is not for nice people" — difficult decisions are part of corrections to surpluses.
Core commitment: Empathy; focus on big picture; aim to be fair, not necessarily nice.
Building the employee brand:
The goal is not only to increase applications but to find applicants with the right fit.
Emphasize different job aspects for different applicant types; promote internal opportunities; external hires can also be valuable.
Brand image matters for attracting the right talent.
Recruitment: process, sources, and measurement
Recruitment definition: The practices and activities firms use to identify and attract potential employees; used to staff, replace, and cope with shortages.
Three goals of recruitment:
Attract a lot of applicants
Attract applicants who fit the position
Increase likelihood of accepting offers
Key influences on recruitment decisions
Job choice: Vacancy characteristics influence applicant choice; applicant characteristics influence their job choice; recruiter traits and organizational policies influence applicants too; recruitment sources feed into recruitment influences.
Vacancy characteristics and job characteristics
Vacancy characteristics: How desirable is the vacancy? Noncompensatory vs. compensatory evaluation:
Noncompensatory: If it doesn’t meet a threshold (e.g., pay or proximity), applicants discard it.
Compensatory: Consider strengths across multiple attributes.
The implicit favorite concept: applicants compare other jobs to an exemplar.
Position characteristics (examples studied):
Pay
Job security
Advancement opportunities
Location
Benefits
Travel requirements
Actual rankings observed (from in-class exercise data):
Pay #1
Job security #2
Advancement opportunities #3
Location #4
Benefits #5
Travel requirements #6
Recruitment sources: internal vs external
Internal sources: Hiring from within (often cheaper and can introduce fresh ideas).
External sources: Advertisements, employment agencies, headhunters, colleges/universities, online recruiting, referrals, walk-ins, poaching from competitors.
Internal vs External: advantages and disadvantages summarized:
Internal: cheaper; preserves culture; limited in small firms or when seeking new ideas.
External: brings new skills; could be riskier; broader pool; online recruiting expands reach.
Recruitment sources: online recruiting
Advantages:
Efficiency; data entry by applicants; broad reach (e.g., large job boards with millions of resumes)
Data collection on demographics, intent, etc.
Disadvantages/Risks:
Equity concerns: do all candidates have equal access?
Self-selection bias: may attract many unqualified applicants
Yield ratios and cost per hire
Yield ratios measure the percentage of applicants advancing from one stage to the next in the process.
Cost per hire = total recruitment cost / number of hires for that vacancy type.
Use of yield ratios and cost per hire helps identify which sources are most valuable.
Informed self-selection and recruiter influence
Informed self-selection: candidates who fit the job are more likely to apply; those who don’t are less likely.
Current employees, referrals, and interns are more likely to self-select.
Gender differences exist in job-search behaviors (e.g., who applies).
Recruiter characteristics:
Small impact on initial acceptance, larger impact on likelihood of a second interview.
Often not trained; can inadvertently harm (e.g., poor behavior).
More effective when recruiting is done by a team rather than by a single recruiter.
Realistic Job Preview (RJP) and candidate fit
Realistic Job Preview (RJP) can improve perceptions of fairness and reduce initial turnover.
RJP is particularly important for diversity recruitment, but must reflect reality to avoid backfire.
Realistic job previews, diversity, and biases
Even with diverse hiring commitments, biases persist in recruitment.
Implicit bias can influence outcomes; resources exist to test and mitigate bias (e.g., implicit bias test links).
The firm’s recruitment branding and policy documents
Personnel policies and employer image matter for vacancy desirability and recruitment success.
Examples shown included notable brands and recruitment images to illustrate employer branding impact.
Practical recruitment measurements
Yield ratios and cost per hire are essential metrics to evaluate source effectiveness.
Online recruiting provides large reach but requires careful handling of equity and data quality.
Exam-ready quick reference
Planning questions: which roles to fill and how to fill them?
Forecasting: distinguish demand vs. supply forecasting; use transition matrices to model internal mobility.
Surplus vs. shortage tactics: know which tactics are fast vs. slow and their relative employee impact.
Recruitment fundamentals: main sources, internal vs external, yield ratios, cost per hire, and the role of recruiter characteristics.
Realistic previews and diversity: benefits, limitations, and how biases can intrude into recruitment; use RJP to improve fairness and reduce early turnover.
Ethical considerations: empathy, fairness, and big-picture focus when making HR decisions.