Dental Evidence in Forensic Identification – An Overview, Methodology and Present Status

DENTAL EVIDENCE IN FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION

  • Authors: Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan, Arun K. Garg

    • Affiliations:

    • Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

    • Department of Forensic Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore (A Constituent Institute of Manipal University), India

    • Department of Orthodontics, Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India

  • Abstract:

    • Forensic odontology involves the use of dental and oral structures for legal identification.

    • Techniques in forensic odontology aid in identifying human remains following

    • terrorist attacks,

    • accidents (airplane, train, road),

    • mass murders,

    • natural disasters (tsunamis, earthquakes, floods) - known as Disaster Victim Identification (DVI).

    • Dental structures are resilient, resistant to decomposition, and high temperatures, making them crucial for identification.

    • Identification is based on the uniqueness of each individual’s oral cavity—it is impossible for two oral cavities to be the same.

    • Dental features considered for identification include:

    • tooth morphology,

    • size and shape variations,

    • restorations,

    • pathologies,

    • missing teeth,

    • wear patterns,

    • crowding,

    • tooth color,

    • rotations, and

    • dental anomalies.

    • In the absence of ante-mortem dental records, teeth can provide information to determine:

    • age,

    • sex,

    • race/ethnicity,

    • habits, and

    • occupations.

    • The overview discusses the utility of dental evidence in forensic identification and its limitations.

  • Keywords:

    • Age estimation,

    • Bite marks,

    • Dental anomalies,

    • Forensic odontology,

    • Sex and race determination from teeth,

    • Wrongful convictions.

INTRODUCTION

  • Definition:

    • “Forensic odontology is a branch of dentistry which deals with the proper handling and examination of dental evidence and the proper evaluation and presentation of dental findings in the interest of justice.” [1]

  • Scope and Importance:

    • Forensic odontology is now recognized as a specialty within forensic sciences.

    • Integral to international forensic educational organizations like:

    • American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS)

    • International Association of Identification (IAI)

    • Primary utility in identifying human remains amidst highly damaged bodies in disaster scenarios (e.g., bomb blasts, airplane crashes) where other identification methods (fingerprints, facial features) are compromised.

  • Teeth Characteristics:

    • Adult human dentition includes:

    • incisors,

    • canines,

    • premolars, and

    • molars with unique arrangements and characteristics.

    • Identification features include:

    • dental pathology,

    • restorations, and

    • dental anomalies.

  • Goals of the Review:

    • Highlight the importance of teeth in the identification process

    • Utility in biological profile estimation (age, sex, race)

    • Present status of dental evidence in forensics.

AGE DETERMINATION

  • Significance:

    • Dental maturity is crucial in estimating ages, especially in children and adolescents.

  • Methods:

    • Erupted teeth and their sequence help gauge age.

    • Radiographic methods enhance accuracy in determining mineralization stages.

    • Comparison of Estimates:

    • Dental mineralization is less susceptible to variations in nutrition and endocrine status compared to bone mineralization.

  • Techniques for Adults:

    • Gustafson Method (1950):

    • Utilizes regressive changes in teeth to estimate age based on features:

      • Occlusal attrition,

      • Coronal secondary dentine formation,

      • Loss of periodontal attachment,

      • Cementum apposition,

      • Apical resorption,

      • Root transparency.

    • Johnson's Improvements:

    • Expanded upon Gustafson’s methods, widely used in forensic practice.

    • Kvaal Method:

    • Measures pulp size in periapical radiographs, correlated with sex.

  • For Children and Adolescents:

    • Eruption status of teeth gives indication of age.

SEX DETERMINATION

  • Overview:

    • Determining sex from teeth is not definitive, yet can provide clues.

  • Techniques:

    • Odontometrics: Measurement techniques relying on size differences in teeth between sexes.

    • Mesio-distal and bucco-lingual dimensions are significant.

    • Linear and Diagonal Measurements:

    • Linear: Mesio-distal and bucco-lingual dimensions.

    • Diagonal: For crowded or rotated teeth.

  • Dental Indices:

    • Indices derived from linear measurements assess sexual dimorphism (e.g., Incisor Index, Mandibular-Canine Index, Crown Index).

    • Findings:

    • Mandibular canines show greater sexual dimorphism than maxillary canines.

    • Overall accuracy of odontometric sex determination is approximately 72%.

    • Non-Metric Features:

    • Canine distal accessory ridge correlates with sex.

    • Advanced Techniques:

    • DNA extraction techniques (PCR) utilized to assess sex using enamel proteins like Amelogenin, distinct patterns between sexes.

RACE DETERMINATION, OCCUPATION/HABITS, AND CULTURAL PRACTICES

  • Overview:

    • Morphological dental features indicate ethnic variations, assisting in distinguishing ancestry.

  • Identifying Features:

    • Characteristics aiding in ethnicity determination include:

    • shoveling of upper incisors (common in Mongoloids),

    • taurodontism,

    • Carabelli's cusp,

    • chisel-shaped incisors,

    • peg-shaped teeth.

  • Influence of Occupation:

    • Certain habits arise from occupational practices:

    • Needle holding (dressmakers),

    • Nail holding (cobblers, carpenters),

    • Pencil and pen biting,

    • Pipe and cigarette smoking.

  • Restoration Methods:

    • Unique methods of restorations convey ethnicity and socio-economic status.

COMPARISON OF DENTAL RECORDS AND ANOMALIES IN THE TEETH

  • Role of Forensic Odontologists:

    • Assist law enforcement in presenting dental evidence from crime or mass fatality scenes.

    • Compare dental evidence against ante-mortem records for identification.

  • Comparative Techniques:

    • Use dental radiographs and available dental records for comparison.

    • Assess features for individualizing characteristics:

    • dental fillings,

    • extractions,

    • crowding,

    • diastema,

    • missing teeth,

    • anomalous root configurations.

  • Types of Dental Anomalies:

    • Anomalies include:

    • microdontia (smaller teeth),

    • macrodontia (larger teeth),

    • anodontia (absence of teeth),

    • hyperdontia (additional teeth).

  • Eruption Disturbances:

    • Impactions & Ectopic Eruptions: Teeth failing to erupt due to obstruction.

    • Shape Disturbances: E.g., dilaceration and flexion, taurodontism.

BITE MARKS

  • Uniqueness:

    • Bite marks are distinctive and considered highly individualistic, crucial for forensic examination.

  • Types of Bite Mark Evidence:

    • Found on victims' skin or on consumables (hard foods).

    • Bite marks assessed through casts or photographs for comparisons.

PALATAL RUGAE

  • Definition:

    • Irregular folds on the palate, unique to individuals, stable throughout life but subject to size changes due to palate growth.

  • Importance:

    • Aid in identifying edentulous individuals and can survive destruction from fire or cases of decomposition.

QUESTIONABLE DENTAL EVIDENCE AND WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS

  • Issues with Bite Mark Evidence:

    • Considered unreliable due to flawed reasoning and lack of statistical validation.

  • Cases of Wrongful Conviction:

    • Documented instances in which DNA disproved associations made from bite marks.

    • Calls for standardized regulations in forensic practices initiated by US Department of Justice and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

CONCLUSION AND PRESENT STATUS OF DENTAL EVIDENCE

  • Current Utility of Dental Evidence:

    • Despite advances such as DNA profiling, dental records play a significant role in identifying deceased individuals in mass fatalities.

    • In their absence, dental evidence can assist in estimating biological profiles (age, sex, race).

    • Caution advised due to population-specific variations in dental traits.

  • Promotion of Forensic Odontology:

    • Urgent need to promote this specialty through education and advisory in dental sciences for forensic casework and investigations.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

  • Authors' Declaration:

    • No conflict of interest reported.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  • Gratitude:

    • Authors thank their respective universities for supporting research publications in reputable international journals.