W8 L1: Moral Development
theories of moral development
sociobiological
psychoanalytic - freud
social learning perspective - bandura
Piaget’s theory of moral development
observations
open-ended interviews
talk about dilemas - intention vs. outcome
ask children what boy from 2 different stories is more problematic depending on the consequences of their actions
heteronomous morality: children up to 7yrs - outcome is more important, morality constraint
autonomous morality: 11/12yrs - intention seen as paramount, morality of cooperation
decisions driven by cognitive changes - associated with peer interaction
developmental change in morality
limitations
task demands
underestimated certain abilities in young children
- understanding of intention
- reasoning about authority figures
lack of clarity about what is changing when children get older
Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning
reasoning about hypothetical dilemmas
asking for reasonings
wife sick - husband asked to pay later - medic said no - should husband steal the drug? why?
6 stages of development
level 1 - pre conventional (punishment, instrumental)
level 2 - conventional (good boy/girl, social system)
level 3 - principled, post conventional (social contrast, ethical principle)
limitations
not clear enough differentiation between moral issues a d social convention
cultural differences
overlooks gender differences
people advanced through a linear manner - discontinuous stage theory
gender bias?
carol Gilligan 1982-1993
reviewed studies and compared answers
jake 11yrs: dilema between different types of rights property and life, balanced both
amy 11yrs: impact of theft in relationship of husband and wife - good husband is prioritised
woman’s morality is different from what past studies have stated
Kohlber - lack of empirical evidence of gender differences
some studies have found that girls and women focus more on issues about caring about others in their moral judgement than justice compared to boys and men
cultural differences?
Miller & Bersoff 1992
8, 12 and 21 yrs - americans and indians (n = 140)
dilemas involving conflicting interpersonal and justice obligations
man stolen wallet with train ticket to wedding of off (needed to be ther bc he had the wedding wrings) - no one gave him money. - found a jacket with enough money for a ticket + a ticket
ben should take the money or not?
results
indians - 84% yes, interpersonal reasons
americans 39% yes, more justice reasons
no moderation by ages
domains of social judgement
rule understanding in children
moral: violating others rights, damage to others property
social-conventional: violation of norms or conventions, disrupted social order and social attention
is this difference depending on social aspects?
Haidt et al. 1993 - depends by country (Brazil and US, 360 ppts)
the role of social experience
at home with family
at school
reasons for giving an apology or excuse
avoid punishment
promote positive relationships
looking at others feelings
defend/ improve social evaluation of self
- increases with age
- more common with social-conventional violations
- 4-9yrs old self conscious emotions become increasingly common after social-conventional violations