Lecture 3 (Feb 1, 2024) - Marriage in Renaissance Italy
What Was Italy Like in the (Early) Renaissance?
Population rise after 1000 → more cities, bigger cities
New institutions, like universities; new religious orders; uptick in economy trade/manufacturing
Setback 1348: Black Death
Killed about ⅓ of all Europeans
Though a lot of people died, cities and towns did not disappear; had momentum
Culture of Italy was founded in cities; popolo (middle classes) helped revive study of ancient Rome, culture, laws = humanism = what we associate w/culture of Renaissance
They need it: they’re running trade, banking → text and written documents
Northern Italy was the most urbanized area of Europe from 1100-1300 (but pop only 80k, seems big to them, hard to control)
4/6 biggest European cities were Italian pre-Black death
Political authority was the city
Town governments (communes) are key political actors - they want expanding territory as well
“Text factories” - their economies and politics need documents, writing experts (notaries)
Holy Roman Emperor was not effective governance in Italy, or remaining there consistently (not holy, not Roman, not an empire → confederation of little states who elect emperor)
Popes are also not capable of ruling/being on the ground
The Example of Florence: The Guild Republic
Palazzo della Signoria, Florence (city government = legislative and executive)
9 priors
Lots of committees → taking power and disperse it (they didn’t want one single individual to take power)
Podesta was the judicial magistrate and police official, offices are in the Palazzo del Podesta (also called Bargello)
People are loyal on some level to the city but also to trade guilds (also social organizations)
Guilds are building blocks of economic life and Florentine government
In order to participate in government, you need to belong to a guild
Loyalty to trade is built into loyalty to city-state, integrated as a pol-soc org
Part of status to serve what they call Republic (representative gov) sense of pride, increase stature
If husband died, woman could assume position of trade and be part of guild, but not eligible for office
Archbishop of Florence served as judge in specific cases, including determining legitimate marriages (Archbishop Antoninus adjudicates Giovanni and Lusanna)
Both priest and judge
He is expert in matters of canon law
Marriage Defined by RCC during Renaissance
Three simple things for marriage: eligibility, consent, and consummation
Without any of these, the marriage was invalid
If a man is impotent and cannot penetrate a woman, the marriage is invalid (never having children is okay, though)
Some elements we might expect are missing: witnesses, no priest necessary in order for it to be valid
Not unusual to have an exchange of rings
Church’s Minimal Rules Left Room for Clandestine/Secret Marriage
E.g. Romeo and Juliet
Difference in age, social status
Wealthy urban elites disliked it - economic significance in dowry: goods, money, or land that passed from the bride’s family to the groom’s family; political implications; social implications
Needed to be settled by people’s parents
Marriage Practices Among Elites of Italian Cities and Towns
Marriage varies from place to place
Notary rather than the priest was the most important official
Contract of betrothal
Record/document of dowry
Exchange of vows/rings/clasping of hands
Next is all local traditions
Important in Florence specifically: “menare a Casa” → procession of bride to groom’s house
These documents don’t replace the church requirements - consent, consummation still matter
When sex happens: vows & consummation - order is not clear
Sometimes happened after betrothal
Social logic of marriage as process - evidence from working people of Verona
Matrilocal emphasis (bride’s father and mother)
Man would visit the woman in the family home → whether two people were married or not, man is over there is a good criterion
People could leave unions that were not working; love and sexual compatibility considered essential
Eating meals together is like a trial period; each would be allowed to go their own separate ways and choose another partner
But sometimes, one said they were married and the other did not → court
Marriage determined to be a sacrament by theologians, then should be in the hands of the church to decide that issue
How did we get to the point we are today when we think about marriage?
Council of Trent gave everything we associate with marriage today → priest, witnesses, document, banns prior to the wedding