Notes: Philosophy, Theories, Approaches, Continuity, and Assessment for Education Practice
Values and Beliefs: aligning theory to practice
- Start with your values and beliefs about teaching and learning, and align them to your image of the child and your role as an educator.
- Consider where the curriculum comes from and what informs it; think about how children learn.
- You should name theories briefly, but focus on connection to your values, not on quotes or slide text citations.
- It’s acceptable to paraphrase or reference readings/textbooks to show alignment with course content, but rely on your own words in the main slides.
- You may discuss more than one theory to show breadth; theories can complement each other and evolve over time (e.g., behavioural to social to post-structural). Demonstrate how they share social aspects or beliefs.
- Expect that some theories sit alongside others at different developmental stages; show how two named theories can collectively support your values.
- Practical goal: demonstrate breadth of knowledge and ability to connect theory to practice, not just recite a single theory.
- On presentation criteria: make eye contact with the audience, look at the camera, avoid reading directly from slides; pull a point and then talk about it.
- Use dot points to present your ideas; avoid verbatim scripts; provide a stampable example under each dot point instead of copying full sentences.
- You may include paraphrased references to readings or textbooks to demonstrate alignment with course content; keep the main slides in your own voice.
- You should consider a second or third theory that complements your primary theory, to show connectivity across developmental theories (e.g., behavioural, social, post-structural).
- Your slide should illustrate how your philosophy connects to your practice, including what informs your curriculum and your view of children.
Approaches and Pedagogy: fitting practice to theory and values
- After the values/theory slide, the next slide(s) focus on approaches and pedagogy that fit the stated theory and philosophy.
- Provide multiple concrete examples of how you’ll work with children, families, and learning environments; include environment setup and resource choices; and align practices with the chosen theories.
- Emphasize the alignment among approach, pedagogy, and theory; show how grassroots practices fit the broader theoretical lens.
- Discuss how your practices differ by context: infant rooms, toddler rooms, and transitions to primary school; explain how you adapt while keeping a consistent underlying belief about children.
- Include multiple approaches and pedagogical practices that fit under the same theory to demonstrate breadth and synthesis (e.g., Zygosian/interest-based approaches). Explain how they could be realized in both early childhood services and primary teaching.
- Address continuity of learning across service types and rooms; show practical examples of continuity in learning across infants to primary, with age-appropriate adjustments.
- Include examples of how to connect your approach to legislative and policy frameworks:
- Early Childhood: EYLF (Early Years Learning Framework), National Quality Standards (NQS).
- Primary: Australian Curriculum and relevant syllabi.
- The slide should provide specific examples across both sectors (early childhood and primary) including how you would deliver the teaching approach, the kinds of environments you’d create, and how you’d support continuity of learning.
- The rubric emphasizes synthesis, alignment, and the ability to critique and synthesize key ideas; show how your approaches can be complementary or contrasting in a thoughtful way.
- Discuss how your chosen approach could be realized in different settings (e.g., in primary settings, what a continuity of learning plan looks like), and be explicit about practical implementation.
- Include notes about relationships with families and communities and how those partnerships inform your pedagogy.
- Slide four should elaborate on approach and working with families/communities; you may introduce another theory or named approach and show how your pedagogies reflect continuity of learning.
- Acknowledge that your approach may be adjusted for age, setting, and individual children while maintaining consistent values.
- For education policy relevance, discuss how your approach links to EYLF, NQS, Australian Curriculum, and syllabi, with concrete examples of delivery in each sector.
- You may need additional slides (e.g., Slide 8) if you have many references; focus on quality sources over quantity.
Continuity of Learning: transitions and across service types
- Slide five focuses specifically on continuity of learning across service types and within rooms.
- Provide three slides worth of content to show a rich, specific understanding of continuity in learning.
- Draw from multiple named approaches to show how continuity can be realized in different contexts and to support the same learning goals.
- Highlight concrete examples of continuity: how learning in infant rooms translates to toddler and then to primary contexts, and how expectations and practices adapt with age, while the underlying philosophy remains stable.
- Use these examples to demonstrate how your approach supports a child’s ongoing learning journey across settings and transitions.
- The role of evaluation and critical reflection is introduced as a key tool for practice; this will be explored in tutorials.
- Evaluation should be framed as regular and ongoing; consider who is involved and what is being evaluated.
- Connect evaluation to your theoretical understanding and how you apply it to your teaching approach and environment.
- Consider concrete criteria or examples of things to reflect on (e.g., a transition that didn’t go well, staffing fluctuations, continuity disruptions due to casual staff, how those affect children).
- Use reflection to inform adjustments across teaching practices, environment, and staffing to maintain continuity and meet learning goals.
Slide structure and presentation quality: how to present effectively
- Slides should align with the content and the values/theory; avoid overloading slides with text; use images purposefully to support your perspective.
- Images should reflect the child’s engagement, curiosity, agency, and democratic thinking; avoid gimmicky or overly cartoonish images; ensure visual consistency with your theoretical perspective.
- Citations and references must be present; use APA style (APA 7) with alphabetically arranged references; include italicization where appropriate; use hanging indentation; ensure accuracy and currency of sources.
- When including images, cite them on the slides and include them in the reference list; you may need an extra slide (slide 8) if many references or images are used.
- There is a strong emphasis on using current legislation and practice references rather than outdated materials; prefer sources from the last decade for policy and practice.
- The visuals should support your message and not distract from your arguments; consider including a representation of your learning space or learning environment to illustrate your approach.
- You will have five minutes per student to present; be concise and focused; use bullet points with short, concrete examples underneath each point rather than verbatim text.
- You will be asked questions after your presentation (Q&A); you’ll have a short time to respond; be prepared to elaborate with additional examples demonstrating alignment to theory, practice, and environment.
- Expect a brief cue if you go over time; you should be prepared to finish the last point and then address questions.
- Practice is essential: rehearse with peers or family, in front of a mirror, record yourself, and analyze your delivery (eye contact, pausing, pace, and facial expression).
- Timing and logistics: expect a group of four; you may present with peers you don’t know; be ready to engage with a professional audience.
Practical tips for delivery and assessment logistics
- Five-minute presentation per student; present your dot points and examples rather than reading; use a finger-point or bullet structure to cue your talk.
- Do not read slides; maintain camera engagement; write dot points and have examples ready to speak to from memory.
- There will be a Q&A after the presentation; lifeline questions may be used to request further examples or clarify connections to theory and practice.
- Arrive 5–10 minutes early; if you are late, you may receive a late penalty as you agreed to be in the session for the full hour.
- Presentations will be recorded for double-marking; all four markers will review; marks are released after the group finalization period, typically within two weeks.
- AI usage policy: you must include an AI cover sheet; presenting generated content as your own words is discouraged; you should write in your own words and then use AI only for brainstorming and feedback purposes; misrepresenting AI-generated content may trigger an AI reflection process.
- If you use Canva or another tool, you may need to convert/export to PowerPoint or provide a screenshot; discuss with the instructors for feasibility; avoid excessive animations as they eat into presentation time.
- Cover page: include a photo for identification purposes on the AI cover sheet (student photo); ensure the photo aligns with institutional guidelines and does not create privacy concerns.
- Booking your slot: use the assessment check group booking link to select a time; you can see other group members to coordinate with your core group; you should know your date/time and show up ready to present.
- If you need to adjust slides to include additional references, you may add an extra slide without affecting overall marking, as needed.
- Ensure your slides are not overcrowded; maintain readability and a clear flow from philosophy to theory to approach to continuity to evaluation and references.
- The audience is professionals (peers); expect professional dialogue; maintain a tone suitable for an academic/professional setting.
Theoretical prompts and constraints for your theory slide
- You should name theories you align with and show how they connect to your values; avoid lengthy introductions to new theories not covered in class due to time limits.
- If you mention a theory not introduced in the course, you should quickly explain its relevance and alignment, but be mindful of the limited five-minute window.
- It is acceptable to reference relationships among theories (complementary, contrasting) without detailed exposition of each theory; focus on connections to course content and your practice.
- If you want to discuss alternative or additional theories, frame them as aligned with core beliefs and show commonalities rather than detailed descriptions.
Key logistical points about references and resources
- Include references to set textbooks and essential readings; reference current legislation and standards (EYLF, NQS, Australian Curriculum, syllabus) as a minimum.
- Avoid outdated references; prefer sources from within the last ten years for contemporary practice; if older theories are used, acknowledge and contextualize their relevance.
- Maintain proper APA 7th edition formatting: alphabetized reference list, hanging indent, italics for book/article titles, and accurate pagination/DOIs where available.
- Ensure that all images used are properly cited in the reference list.
What to prepare and practice before the session
- Create your slides with a clear progression: values/beliefs → theories → approaches/pedagogies → continuity of learning → evaluation/critical reflection → references.
- Prepare a cover sheet (AI-related if required) and have a separate reference slide; consider whether you need an extra slide for references (Slide 8).
- Practice delivering with natural eye contact, appropriate pacing, and minimal reliance on reading; practice with a peer for feedback.
- Prepare to discuss practical implications in both early childhood and primary contexts, with concrete examples and policy connections.
- Prepare for questions that may require further examples across both sectors and how your practices adapt to different contexts.
Ethical and practical implications highlighted in the session
- Ethical AI use: present content in your own words; AI-generated content should be properly acknowledged with an AI cover sheet; misrepresentation may lead to further action.
- Professional integrity: be authentic in presenting your philosophy and ensure your examples align with your stated beliefs and with current best practice.
- Practical constraints: manage time, slide density, and the balance between theory and practice; ensure the content is accessible and engaging for a professional audience.
- Equity and inclusivity: ensure the presentation respects diverse learners and families and demonstrates continuous learning across sectors while aligning with current standards.
Quick reference points (numbers and policies mentioned)
- Assignment weight: 50 ext{ ext{%}}
- Presentation time per student: 5 ext{ minutes} (with room for questions after)
- Group size: four students per session
- Slide guidance: up to eight slides; slide seven for references; slide eight only if references don’t fit; images require citation
- Eye contact guideline: aim to engage the audience for 70 ext{ ext%} to 80 ext{ ext%} of the time
- Time and scheduling: arrive 5–10 minutes early; late arrivals may incur penalties; sessions are recorded for double-marking
- Legislation and standards to cite: EYLF, NQS (Early Childhood); Australian Curriculum and syllabus (Primary)
- Image and visual guidance: images should reflect the child’s agency and learning; avoid gimmicky visuals; ensure consistency with philosophical stance
- AI policy: require AI cover sheet; present in own words; AI usage covered in reflection if necessary
Suggested slide sequence (recap)
- Slide 1: Cover / AI cover sheet and photo for identification
- Slide 2: Values and beliefs; child image; educator role; connection to curriculum; brief theory list
- Slide 3: Theoretical alignment; brief description of named theories and how they connect to values; note complementarities
- Slide 4: Approaches and pedagogy; concrete examples; environment, resources; cross-sector applicability
- Slide 5: Continuity of learning; cross-service/room continuity; practical examples across infant → primary
- Slide 6: Evaluation and critical reflection; roles, processes, who is involved; reflective prompts
- Slide 7: Policy and practice connections; EYLF, NQS, Australian Curriculum, syllabi; references
- Slide 8: Additional references or image credits (if needed)
- Optional: extra slide if more references or additional images require citation
Final reminders from the instructor (summary)
- Engage with the audience, speak clearly, and avoid reading verbatim from slides
- Use dot points with brief examples; be prepared to elaborate verbally
- Link practice to theory and policy; demonstrate critical thinking and synthesis
- Practice delivering within strict time limits; manage the five-minute slot and Q&A
- Ensure all references and images are properly cited; maintain currency and relevance of sources
- If using Canva or other tools, confirm with the instructor about export formats and submission requirements
- Be punctual for presentations and adhere to scheduling and room policies
- Expect feedback and be prepared to adjust based on marker questions and discussion
Connections to prior content and real-world relevance
- The emphasis on multiple theories and their complementarities reflects foundational principles in education about plurality of perspectives and the evolution of theories over time.
- The focus on child-centered, interest-based, and socially situated learning aligns with contemporary early childhood and primary education discourse about agency, inquiry, and continuity across transitions.
- The policy connections (EYLF, NQS, Australian Curriculum) ground theoretical perspectives in real-world regulatory and curricular contexts, highlighting the practical implications of theoretical choices for teaching practice and service delivery.
- The ethical considerations around AI usage reflect broader debates about authenticity, authorship, and integrity in academic work and professional practice.