Primary Research vs. Review Articles

Primary Research Articles

  • Reports of original research.
  • Test hypotheses by presenting novel analyses of data not considered or addressed in previous reports.
  • Typically consist of distinct sections that reflect the stages in the research process.

Elements of Primary Research Articles:

  • Introduction: Development of the problem under investigation, including a statement of the purpose of the investigation.
  • Methods: Description of the procedures used to conduct the investigation (sometimes with variations, such as Materials and Methods).
  • Results: Report of the findings (usually followed with charts and statistical tables).
  • Discussion: Summary, interpretation, and implications of the results.

Examples of Primary Research:

  • Thompson B, Waterhouse M, English DR, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and major cardiovascular events: D-Health randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2023;381:e075230. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-075230
  • Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. Vitamin D supplements and prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):33-44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1809944

Review Articles

  • Literature reviews, including research syntheses and meta-analyses, are critical evaluations of material that has already been published.
  • In meta-analyses, authors use quantitative procedures to statistically combine the results of many studies.
  • Authors analyze and evaluate current research and investigations related to a specific topic, field, or problem.
  • Not primary sources since they review previously published material.
  • Organize, integrate, and evaluate previously published material to consider the progress of research toward clarifying a problem.
  • Often as lengthy or even longer than original research articles.
  • Can be of great value for identifying potentially good primary sources, but they aren't primary themselves.

Hallmarks of Review Articles:

  • Define and clarify the problem.
  • Summarize previous investigations to inform the reader of the state of research.
  • Identify relations, contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the literature.
  • Suggest the next step or steps in solving the problem.

Example of a Literature Review:

  • de la Puente Yagüe M, Collado Yurrita L, Ciudad Cabañas MJ, Cuadrado Cenzual MA. Role of vitamin D in athletes and their performance: Current concepts and new trends. Nutrients. 2020;12(2):579. doi:10.3390/nu12020579

Identifying Article Type

  • Read the abstract to get a sense of the kind of article being presented; a review article abstract should make that clear.
  • Absence of an abstract may indicate it is not a primary resource.
  • Short research articles may not include all elements; look for phrases like "we tested" and "in our study, we measured" to identify original (primary) research.