Psych 135 5-6 Lecture
3rd option of escaping objective self awareness:
Escaping the self through distraction:
We spend a lot of time and money trying to escape the self, thinking about ourself is an aversive experience, we often realize were not living up to the expectations of the generalized other
Ways to escape the self
Movies, tv, video games
Sex drugs rocknroll
Meditation skiing reading
Escape the pressure of life’s standards
What is deindividuation:
Gustav le bon 1895: when an individual is placed in a large crowd, the unconscious mind of each individual emerges and creates a “collective mind” that is primitive in nature and causes uninhibited behavior
Loss of awareness, individual identity and thus individual accountability
What conditions cause deindividuation?
Phil Zimbardo 1969
Anonymity
Lack of accountability
Arousal
Large group
Sensory overload
Altered states of consciousness (drugs, alcohol, lack of sleep
What deindividuation does to our minds:
Minimizes self awareness
Minimizes concern for social evaluation
Time distortion
Only now, no past or present
No subject object dichotomy ??
Uninhibited impulsive behavior
Behavior is not guided by the generalized other
Behavior of nearby others in contagious
Reduced memory for actions
A theoretical model of deindividuation
Crowd induced impulsive behavior
What type of behavior does deindividuation lead to?
Positive behavior
Negative behavior
a Dionysian state
More automaticity, less reflection
All of the above
Answer: all of the above
Deindividuation = less apollonian and reflective → more dionysian
Does losing self-awareness (deindividuation) cause socially deviant behavior
Ex: eagles fans after a big win, people tore down lamposts, set fires → they simply follow desires without thinking long term
How do researchers deindividuate subjects:
No names
smocks/hoods
Moral depravity that follows anonymity
Participants were asked to describe pornography and deindividuated/anonymous participants used a significantly higher amount of taboo language compared to individuated non anonymous participants
same seen in participants asked to administer shocks to others, deindividuated participants give significantly more shock intensity
Deindividuation and transgression
Another halloween study
Individuals vs groups of kids
Anonymous or not
Kids either gave their name and address or not
Repeated kids name for extra emphasis
Anonymous kids in groups were much more likely to take more candy and transgress
Is losing self awareness and self control always bad? NOPE
Ex: social media has us constantly worrying about how we are perceived and its bad
Chiefs fans superbowl win: everyone sings and cries, whatever the group norm quickly decides on is what spreads, impulsive behavior whatever the first people do sets a norm for how others will follow
Something about being in the dark makes people let their guards down more
Ex: deindividuation in the dark study
Flow:
Complete immersion
No self evaluation
Positive experience
Engaged in the moment, more than happy, fully engaged in living in the moment
When ur skills match with the task ur doing, its not too challenging where you get frustrated but not too easy where you get bored
In control without exerting control
Automaticities match behavioral demands
Flow is what happens when self consciousness gets out of the way and skill takes over
Loss of self awareness:
The context matters more
Tend to do what others are doing
Tend not to think about what others think of what you are doing
Can be “good” or “bad” depending on the context and who is evaluating you
Flow vs deindividuation
Deindividuation vs flow: comparing two ways of escaping the self
Self as impulse vs self as institution 1976
Are we most ourselves during self control or when we lose control?
Is the self the controller or the controlled in “self-control”
Do our impulses define us bc they really come from within
Dyonisian
Does our ability to control our impulses and be a constructive member of society define us?
Apollonian