Aquinas I
Life
(1224/5- 1274)
lived in an interesting time regarding Christianity, ethics→ in the Middle Ages
lots of philosophical interest, questions about whether they should only look towards the Bible to understand God or other philosophical writing
most influential thinker w/in Catholic tradition
born into minor nobility in Southern Italy (ruled over by Sicily at the time), younger son so not too important in society
sent to live in a monastery until 13 (Benedictine monks)→ devoted their lives to God, very traditional, stuck to Bible
expected to be an Abbot (head of a monastery)
powerful families had some sons in military, some in business, and at least one that’s an Abbot
sent to Naples for college (atp all colleges are religious)
Dominicans (diff order than Benedictines) run this college, have a huge theological belief difference
Greek was being rediscovered→ reading some of the same stuff we did, especially philosophical stuff like Aristotle (when he says “the philosopher”, refers to him)
Dominicans believed you should use outside knowledge (mainly Greek) to understand Christianity better
willing to be influenced by Arabic, Jewish, Greek, etc writings and he’ll cite everybody→ can be dangerous/get him in trouble
he wanted to be a Dominican but his parents wanted him to be Benedictine (his family kidnapped him and locked him in family castle to keep him from going to France and hanging out with more Dominicans→ story ab his family releasing a sex worker in the room to tempt him, he takes a burning log and chases her out, inscribes something in the room…his mom eventually lets him escape and make his way north all over Europe)
He kept learning b/c wanted to get a master’s degree in teaching and teach others
he was very reserved in general, didn’t talk very much
one of his teachers said “you can call him the dumb ox if you want but one day this ox’s bellowing will echo around the world” (that was his nickname)
loved to teach Gospel of Matthew, focused on converting people, loved to teach about that
Obtaining Knowledge
Through your senses
Ration
Revelation/Faith
limit to human knowledge → look to divine knowledge
can be imparted to humans by God, where the first 2 are purely human
reveals deeper truths
Ex: you know you’re a student at Rhodes but after a while you feel a part of Rhodes→ according to Aquinas, this feeling is brought about by God
Aquinas did not believe in faith without any human knowledge and ration
Writings
writes in very straightforward ways at times like Aristotle but his ways of proving God exists align with how teaching worked around that time
advanced students at that time would do readings and then there would be someone leading the class, divide the class in half (yes/no sides) and there would be a yes/no question posed→ have to argue for that side→ strengthened rhetorical skills even for lesser arguments
teacher would synthesize arguments and come up with a final answer
kind of like Sophistry b/c can make lesser arguments greater
Teaching like this = Scholastic Method
class arguments = Disputations
he has very strong opinions, not really a middle ground
does list arguments against God, like evil exists, but also approaches it from the science side of things, like there are natural causes for most things
lists all his yes arguments:
Motion→ there must be something that started moving the first thing, like laws of motion in Newtonian physics→ God is first mover+unmoved, is Aristotle’s idea applied in a Christian concept
Cause and effect
Things exist
Gradations→ some things better than others, best thing = God, like Plato’s form of the good
Order in the Universe
at the time, no concept of infinity, which kinda throws a wrench in some of these
proofs do prove God exists for a very narrow definition for God when there are several things that cannot be explained, unknown = God, whether God is purposeful or just some unsolved mystery titled God
God allows there to be evil so He can make good out of it, taken from Augustine
Law:
Eternal
Divine- part that He has made available to humans
Natural- humans look at the world and rational part of your brain can discern patterns of how things are supposed to work, like laws of physics
what is in effect w/o human laws
everyone does what they think is the right way to behave according to how a majority sane people population would act
stealing unchecked = wrong
no one would get drunk b/c everyone can see bad consequences
Human- look at natural, develop a sense of right and wrong in a community
some just and some unjust
has conditions
don’t have to obey unjust laws
created by someone in power to make laws on behalf of people
must align with natural law b/c that aligns w/ eternal law
War:
ruler must have the authority to start a war
must have a just cause- avenge injuries, in response to an offense, punishment for failing to right a wrong
must be fought with good intentions
Scholastic method did start modern science→ look at 2 different approaches and prove or disprove them