Infill Guide
Infill in 3D Printing
Definition of Infill
Infill: The internal structure inside a 3D printed part that influences various attributes of the final product, such as:
Strength: Affects how much load the part can withstand.
Weight: Heavier infill contributes to increased weight of the part.
Print Time: More infill requires more time to print.
Durability: Affects the overall robustness of the part.
Choosing Infill in Slicer Software
Infill settings are typically selected in slicer applications (e.g., Cura, PrusaSlicer).
Description of Infill
What Is Infill?: It is the pattern that is printed inside a part between the outer walls. The percentage of infill can drastically change the characteristics of the printed part:
0% Infill: Hollow part.
100% Infill: Solid part.
15–40% Infill: Commonly used for FTC (FIRST Tech Challenge) parts.
Impact of Infill Density
More Infill: Results in stronger parts but also increases weight and print time.
Common Infill Patterns
1. Grid Pattern
Description: A square grid pattern stacked layer by layer.
Attributes:
Simplicity: Easy to implement.
Strength: Offers decent strength.
Print Speed: Fast printing.
General Use: Good for a variety of non-critical parts.
Weakness: Not optimal under multi-directional stress.
Use Cases:
Basic brackets
Light-load parts
2. Lines Pattern
Description: Composed of straight parallel lines with alternating directions for each layer.
Attributes:
Speed: Very quick to print.
Strength: Low overall strength.
Weight: Lightweight construction.
Use Cases:
Cosmetic parts
Covers
Low-stress components
3. Triangles Pattern
Description: Features interlocking triangles.
Attributes:
Strength: Stronger than grid patterns due to effective load distribution.
Speed: Maintains reasonable print speed.
Use Cases:
Moderate load brackets
Structural components
Note: Triangles resist deformation effectively.
4. Honeycomb Pattern
Description: Comprises hexagonal cells.
Attributes:
Strength-to-Weight Ratio: Extremely favorable.
Impact Resistance: Good under shock loads.
Print Speed: Slower to print compared to other patterns.
Use Cases:
High-stress parts
FTC mounts that operate under load
5. Gyroid Pattern (Very Popular)
Description: Curved, wave-like 3D structure.
Attributes:
Strength: Excellent in multi-directional strength.
Stress Distribution: Smooth distribution of stress throughout
Design: No sharp corners inside, aiding in durability.
Efficiency: Strong yet material-efficient.
Use Cases:
Load-bearing brackets
Arm components
Motor mounts
Recommendation: Gyroid is usually the strongest choice for FTC applications.
6. Cubic Pattern
Description: Consists of a 3D cube lattice structure.
Attributes:
Strength: Strong in multiple directions, providing robustness.
Material Usage: Higher than grid pattern.
Use Cases:
Strong structural parts.
7. Concentric Pattern
Description: Constructed with rings that align with the outer walls.
Attributes:
Strength: Not structurally strong but offers flexibility.
Use Cases:
Cosmetic or cylindrical parts.
Infill Percentage
Pattern types are important, but the percentage of infill is even more critical.
Typical FTC Infill Settings:
15–20%: Suitable for lightweight brackets.
30–40%: Appropriate for structural components.
50% or more: Used for high-load applications but often wasteful at 100%.
Alternative Adjustments:
Instead of excessively increasing infill, consider increasing:
Wall thickness
Top and bottom layer counts
Note: Walls contribute significantly more strength than infill itself.
Factors Affecting Strength of 3D Printed Parts
Answering What Makes a 3D Printed Part Strong:
Infill pattern
Infill percentage
Wall thickness
Layer adhesion
Print orientation
Importance of Print Orientation: It plays a crucial role in strength, as parts are typically weakest between layers.
FTC-Specific Advice for Robotics
Recommended Defaults:
Infill Pattern: Gyroid
Infill Percentage: 25–35%
Wall Count: 3–4 walls
Print Orientation: Proper alignment is essential.
Avoidances:
Long unsupported thin prints.
Over-reliance on 3D printed parts for applications demanding high torque.
Comparison: While printed parts have their strengths, they are generally inferior to aluminum in terms of structural integrity.