AAST 200 EXAM 2

Stereotype:

  • smart, good at math, STEM disposed (biological)

  • Wealthy, saves money

  • Hardworking and reliant

  • Docile and submissive, obedient and uncomplaining (social)

  • Don't ask for help or need help

Origin of the Model Minority Myth:

Post 1965 immigration - Factors that attributed to Model Minority Myth

  • 1965 immigration act enabled hyper selectivity for preference based and skilled workers

  • H-1B visa prograM created in 1990 and accelerated hyper-selectivity

  • Perpetuation of Success Frame by Jennifer Lee and Min Zhou 2015; Asian American Paradox

  • “A for average”, “B for Asian fail”

  • Regardless of parental education level, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity

  • Upside of MMM→ helps poor and working class override class disadvantage

  • Reinforced by family, community, educators, and society

First origins of Model Minority Term

  • Article written by Willam Peterson naked “Success Story, Japanese-American Style”

  • Peterson concluded japanese overcame marginalization due to their culture vs the african americans

Context for the development of term

1. Hart Cellar act

2. Not long after japanese-american internment

3. During civil rights movement

Model minority term cont…

  • Japanese americans responded to their wartime internment by us gov by saying i'll become an even better american

  • Conventional measure of success dictates that Japanese americans were more successful than majority of americans

  • 1978 washing post article “Korean americans: pursuing economic success” shares similar sentiment as japanese americans of success

Transition from success stories in the economy to education

  • 1987 Time magazine article “Those asian american whiz kids”

Harm of Model Minority:

Pressure and stress

  • Reference group includes even higher achieving co-ethics, creating an exceptionally high bar

  • Lots of tension and stress among asian american students

  • Dissatisfaction with own achievements causing the “achievement paradox”

  • Ethnicity and achievement get coupled; aka 2nd gen AA distance from their ethnic identity due to high unattainable achievement from their view

Limits occupation and Mobility

  • DEL = Doctor, Engineer, Lawyer

Ignores diversity within and issues

- overlooks certain asian groups that needs assistance

Divisive and resentment between groups

  • Model minority myth used as a racial wedge

  • Pits ethnic groups against each other to downplay racism

  • Barriers to coalition building and alliance across race-ethnic groups

Encourages anti-Asian sentiment and harassment and violence

  • Anti-asian violence in school

Minimizes accomplishments

  • The view of asian americans as high achievers is so significant that it becomes a threat to the ethnic and racial divisions

Model minority myth; educational attainment

Myth 1: AAPI students are taking over US higher education

Fact: increasing AAPI students parallels to other groups

Fact: AAPI densely populated in a small % of institutions give off a false higher admission/enrollment in education overall

  • 2000, ⅔ of aapi students attended college in 8 states

Fact : AAPI students have wide range of academic interests beyond STEM

Myth 2: AA are concentrated in only selective 4 year universities

Fact: aapi are evenly distributed in two year and four year schools with majority attending public institutions

Fact: aapi enrollment in public 2 years increasing at faster rate than their enrollment in 4 year schools

  • Some states over half of aapi students attend public community colleges

Affirmative action and asian americans

  • 1980s increasing populations of AAPI students results in informa quotes to limit quotas

  • The regents of Univ of California vs Bakke 1978

  • Upheld affirmative action using race as factor but did not allow quotas

  • White plaintiffs needed to use asian representation to support argument against quota

  • Asian american penalty; scoring asian americans lower on the social level in terms of admissions/enrollment

  • Used to dismantle affirmative action

  • Significant portion of financial donation to support legacy admission = money gets you in

  • Asian americans benefit from A.A as well

Between two worlds documentary

- Hard to balance family time with parents both working so much; sacrifice for better life of children (common experience theme)

- language barrier between grandparents and grandchildren communication

- opposing traditons/values between older and younger generations

- finding the balance between preserving cultural language and roots while maintaining american identity

- sharon chang

- deals with korean american identity and korean cultural views,

- ideas, personal choices such as eating american food, constant criticism from dad for eating American food

- sharon deals with identity discrepancy stemming from her cultural background integration with american life

- personal take; uniqueness and differences is a good thing rather than focusing on “trying to fit in and look or be like them”

Types of acculturation across generations

  1. Consonant resistance to acculturation

  • Both parents and children are separated and isolated within the ethnic or immigrant community

  • Example; kids growing up in america with an accent

  1. Consonant acculturation

  2. Disonant acculturation

  • 1st gen chooses to remain to their ethnic ties/culture

  • Not learning english, living in ethnic enclave, children seek to abandon cultural, lingual, and geographical association

  1. Selective acculturation

  • 1st generation and children learn language of dominant society but still maintain and carry traditions and cultural ties of ethnic origin

Effects of immigration/acculturation

  • Acculturative stress

  • Intergenerational households and filial piety (feeling of owing and paying back to parents)

  • Language brokering and “Parentified Children” = having to be translator for parents for purposes of daily communication school, doctors, documents, etc

  • Causes stress for children, and studies proven to affect children negatively

  • Differing or clashing around parenting

Challenges confronting immigrant family

  1. Disruption of extended family and friendship networks

  • Findings suggest that there is sense of isolation, leaving family on their own to raise their kids

  1. Role changes within family

  • Sole to dual earners, latch-key kids (kids who go home right after school with no one around and until parents get home)

  1. Generation culture gap

  • Traditions and cultural views are not in synch or aligned with modern asian-american generation children

Generational gap

  • Parents; kids to go to ivy league, be your own boss, etc

  • Children; desires to fit in, attend sports games, and fit in with image

Sensitive pressure points

  1. Cultural gap

  • Chinese immigrant parents- filial piety is expected

  • Notion of unconditional obedience or submission to authority, parents, seniors, elderly

  • Little room for individualism (honor/shame saving face)

  • Narrow success frame, education is most effective and only means to achieve success

  • For children, different american cultural norms creating a “pressure cooker”

  1. Work ethic

  • For chinese parents, hard work is the key to educational success (not natural ability or innate intelligence)

  • As result, children often find themselves working twice as hard as their american peers and simultaneously feeling that their parents never think that they work hard enough

  1. Thrift

  • Parent emphasis on savings and educational resources vs. for material possessions

  1. Dating

  • too early or interracial

Multi gen households

  • Asian american households more likely to make up of multi generation households

  • 5x more likely to make up multi gen households

  • Asians 24%

  • Whites 13%

  • Many factors for this

  • Grandparents do have impact on how parent-children relationship goes

  • Huge variation across ethnic groups

  • Cambodians 42%

Prevalence and timing of marriage

  • More asian americans are married than others in the same age range; Among men 35-44

  • Asians 78

  • Whites 69

  • Blacks 52

  • Same for women (only a bit higher with exception of black women)

Asian Americans tend to marry at later ages than do whites

Multiracial asian americans

  • 2020, 10.2% of americans identify as being multi-race

  • 2014 2.9%

  • 15.3% of asian americans identified as multi racial

  • Much higher than for whites

  • While much lower than pacific islanders

Anti-miscegenation laws

  • Crime for people of different races to have sex

  • In place of U.S. inceptions

  • Deemed felony

  • 1967 Loving v. Virginia case ended this law

  • Elevated to supreme court case

  • Increased rate since 60’s

Intermarriage

  • Individual choice

  • Marriage markets theory: marriage rate depends on demographic proximity—what and who is available in that geographic area

  • Marital assimilation

  • Hypergamy theory

  • Marrying up; marrying someone who is taller

  • Has more money and resources

  • Has higher status

  • Marrying up in terms of racially aka marrying white race (top of racial hierarchy)

  • Stereotype effect

  • Internalized racism; believing the same stereotypes about their own race

  • Stereotype is amplified through media portrayal most prominent

AA WOMEN: centiering their perspective

  • Intersectional approach;

Understanding multiple ways of understanding inequality and disadvantage that sometimes overlap and create barriers not thought of in conventional ways

  • Relations of power or inequality by race, gender, class, and intersection of

  • AA women face certain pressures, expectations, and structural arrangements

  • Confucian moral code = emphasis on male superiority and authority over women in family and social relations; influenced patriarchal system in vietname and korea

  • When they immigrate, there may be a shift in gender arrangements

Ex: centering on men’s loss of economic power and increased dependency on their wive’s wages

  • Many maintain ethnic patriarchal system to hold parental authority

  1. Patriarchy

  • Couple with kinship systems

  • And son preferences in families

  1. Media and popular images of asian american women

  2. Domestic violence

  3. Conceptions of beauty and internalized racism

  4. Depression and suicide

Patricarchy reinforces male privilege by prescribing bounded roles for women, often in domesticated duties

Son preferences over daughters

  • Sex-selective abortions, dowry

  • Traditional expectations for male and female differ

  • Differences in sex may lead to different amount of treatment and investment in children

Lotus Blossom

  • chastity , sexual availability, powerlessness, and desirabality for male control and possession

Dragon lady

  • Decieving and conniving, utilizing sexuality for advantage

Example: Imagery of petite and exotic beauty remains a common visual theme

  • In relation to the depiction of white men; commonly used trope

  • Hyper-sexualization of asian american women in subservient roles, ojectified and

Domestic violence

  • One study of AAs showed that 42% of respondents knew of a woman who was abused

  • Up to 55% of API experienced some form of abuse in their lifetime

  • ⅓ young respondents saw their father abuse their mother growing up

  • Barriers (victim blaming, financial, language barrier, cultural/religious expectations, immigration status)

  • Can’t be addressed by traditional approaches (individualism; AA women not viewing themselves as individuals rather than a culturally bound family unit prevents them from escaping abuse and seeking support)

Conception of beauty

  • Trying to fit into westernized standards of beauty:

Examples of surgical procedures

  • Double eyelid surgery; surgery to have the fold in the eyelids

  • Nose job prevalent in Asian to cater to more western nose, higher bridge, narrow nostrils

  • Skin whitening

Sign of internalizing a gender ideology that validates their monetary and time investment but also racial ideology that associate their natural feautures with dullness, passivity, and lack of emotion (Kaw 1993)

Results to internalized sexism and racism

  • Believing the stereotypes and myths about their own race

  • Believing the stereotypes and myths about their own sex

  • Can result in lower self-esteem

  • Color prejudism/colorism

  • Self hatred

On a structural level, it can result in

  • Decision making

Ex: resume is selected based off picture attached to resume in korea vs US

  • Resources

  • Standards

  • Naming the problem (people in leadership has and lack of addressing issue)

  • The white woman is the considered ideal body type

  • Ethnic women are further away from that ideal, weight is an issue, but its not the only issue

  • Not just white beauty standards ideals but also asian beauty standards ideal AA women dont meet

  • Eating disorders are on the rise for asian american women but are often not recognized

Depression and suicide:

According to the center for disease control in 2019;

  • Suicide is 3rd largest leading cause of death among young americans (15-24).

  • 1st among asian and pacific islanders

  • Asian american college students had higher rates of depression

  • Nearly 16% of aa women have contemplated suicide in their lifetimes (compared to american women 13%)

  • 2nd among highest rate of suicide among all women aged 15-24 for asian american women

  • AAPI women over 65%

World war II

  • Post ww2 - govenrment suspected japanese of recruiting Jap. Amer. to be spies

  • Anti-japanese sentiment; John DeWitt and Dept. of war made successful case against japanese americans

  • Applied to japanese that were living on the west coast

  • Fred Korematsu; US born Jap. Amer. convicted for evading interment and later would be overturned 40 years later

  • Many returned back to find nothing, no family, no property, possessions, starting back over from nothing

  • Jan 1945 executive order was rescinded and all jap prisoners freed

  • Redress movement JACL; launched restitution

  1. Restitution for $250000 per internee

  2. Apology by congress acknowledging the wrong

  3. Funds to establish education trust fund

  • Aug 10 1988 reagan signed civil liberties act

  • To date over 82000 individuals have been issued a presidential apology and monetary redress payment of $20,000

  • WWII philippines was a US common wealth

  • US military promised full veterans benefits to filipinos who volunteer to fight; more than 250,000 joined

  • 1946 truman signs rescission act; taking that promise away

  • Filipinos activists and their supporters fought for full benefits for decades

  • Bush, Clinton, other presidents promised false hope and benefits still not restored.

  • 2008; obama signs as a part of stimulus bill that releases $198 million for hte Filipinos Equity Compensation Fund

  • Families of decease veterans not eligible to receive the money

  • To this day, Congress still working to compensate for filipino compensation fairness

USA Patriot Act - Post 9/11

  • 6 weeks post 9/11 gives U.S to enhance surveillance powers

  • Takes away due process rights from non-citizens

  • Can place individuals in mandatory detention and deportation

  • Act violates constitutional rights of due process and free speech

  • South asians sikhs and muslim americans experience intense scrutiny as potential enemy threats and are subject to racial profiling

  • 80% of americans use to be against racial profiling (Driving while black etc)

  • Post 9/11 12000 muslim immigrant men were rounded up and detained

  • Many were deported

  • 2002, fed gov established national security act

  • 3 months post 9/11 national asian pacific american legal consortium doc’d 250 incidents of anti-asian hates crimes and 2 murders

  • Majority occured at school or in the workplace

  • Large majority target S. Asian americans particularly Sikh

Asian American Politics

  • AAPI 6% of voting population

Previously:

  • lower voter registration rates

  • Lower voter rate

Barriers to political involvement:

  • Language barrier

  • State voter ID law; additional req’d documentation

  • Lack of outreach from political parties; overlooked by political parties due to small asian population

Growth of elgible AAPI voters in recent years…

  1. Experts argue the interests of other groups are not equally of interests as AAPI population

  2. If they vote as bloc, in larger share of populated areas like Hawaii or CA then they can affect the outcome

  3. Lack of concentration of AAPI in areas and “Apolitcal” identifying for easy convenience for political parties to speak to (Court)

Asian american political participation

  1. Immigrant socialization

  • How are they being socialized to politcs of US

  1. racial/ethnic identity

  • Prominent with vietnamese population due to historical events

  1. parties/politcal institutions

  • How are they reaching out to these communities

  1. Political orientation

  • Where they lean or identify with

  1. Civic engagement

  • Where are they socialized? schoolboards, etc?

  1. Sociopolititcal context

  • Different factors of influence; i.e Gen-Z

Religion in Asian American

Sikhs in America

  • racial/ethnic identity strongly tied to Sikh religion

  • Arranged marriage is prominent

AA religious affiliation:

  • AA are at the lowest % who say religion is important compared to white, black, and hispanics

  • Least likely to attend regular services

  • Declining share of Asian Americans who identify as christians

Functions of asian immigrant church/religion institutions

For parents …

= religious center

= social and cultural center (preserve ethnic culture)

= serve as educational function

= social/community support for parents

= keeps nationalism alive (keeps them connected to origins)

= Pseudo-extended family (broker between congregation and larger society)

= emotional support

= as a primary place to facilitate adjustment to life in the US (assimilate/acculutrate)

Will it be the same for children of immigrants?

  • 3 types of 2nd generation Korean teenagers in the church:

  1. Ethnic/religious

  2. Ethnically identified

  3. Neither ethnic nor religious

After they leave the parent’s church:

  1. Join campus ministries (major ones or creation of their own)

  • 1990’s UC Berkeley had 64 separate Asian Christian Orgs

  • UCLA had 13 Korean American Christian groups in 1999

  • Many campuses in west, n. East…

Young adults post youth church affiliation:

  1. Silent Exodus

Will successive asian americans continue the ethnic religous institutions, will be incorporate into other “main stream” religous institutions, will they lose their religious affiliation?