courts
Functions of Law in Democratic Societies
- Five functions of law:
- Provide security
- Provide predictability
- Resolve conflict
- Reflect and enforce conformity to society’s values
- Distribute benefits and rewards in society
Characteristics of the American Legal Tradition
- Common law tradition:
- A legal system based on the accumulated rulings of judges over time, uniformly applied across the land.
- Primarily based on common law instead of civil law.
- Rely on precedent (or stare decisis).
Kinds of Law
- Types of law include:
- Substantive laws
- Procedural laws
- Criminal laws
- Civil laws
Substantive Laws vs. Procedural Laws
Substantive laws:
- Laws whose content, or substance, defines what we can or cannot do.
- Examples:
- Don’t drink and drive
- Don’t murder
- Don’t club baby seals
Procedural laws:
- Laws that establish how laws are applied and enforced; outline how legal proceedings take place.
- Examples:
- Searches and seizures require a warrant.
- Accused individuals have the right to a speedy trial.
- Accused individuals have the right to counsel.
Criminal Laws vs. Civil Laws
Criminal laws:
- Laws prohibiting behavior determined by the government to be harmful to society; violations are classified as crimes.
- Examples:
- Don’t produce heroin
- No loud rap music
- Don’t steal (the government may perceive this as competition).
Civil laws:
- Laws regulating interactions between individuals; violations result in torts.
- Example:
- Drunk drivers involved in crashes may be sued to cover injured persons' medical expenses.
Other Kinds of Law
Constitutional laws:
- Laws in the Constitution establishing basic powers and limitations of governmental institutions and guaranteeing citizens' basic rights.
Statutory laws:
- Laws made by legislatures at either the state or national level.
Administrative laws:
- Laws established by bureaucracies on behalf of Congress.
Executive orders:
- Directives issued by the president requiring action, stopping activities, altering policy, or changing management practices.
Article III
- Overview:
- The shortest article in the Constitution discussing the judiciary branch and ensuring judicial independence.
Section 1 of Article III
- Judicial power vesting:
- Vests judicial power in the Supreme Court and in inferior courts ordained by Congress.
- Judges are to hold their position during “good behavior.”
- Prohibits diminishing judges' compensation.
Section 2 of Article III
- Judicial power extension:
- Extends to “Cases” and “Controversies.”
- Defines the Court’s original and appellate jurisdiction.
- Guarantees trial by jury in certain circumstances.
Section 3 of Article III
- Definition of treason:
- Establishes the definition of treason and requirements for conviction.
The Development of Judicial Review
- Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78:
- Describes the judicial branch as the least dangerous branch of government.
- The Court lacks power over the purse or sword.
- Approved of judicial review as a means to check the momentary passions of the populace.
Judicial Review
- Established by Marbury v. Madison (1803):
- Background: Thomas Jefferson wins the 1800 presidential election, leading to anti-federalists controlling Congress.
- Federalists authorize losing President John Adams to appoint over 200 nominations.
- John Marshall does not deliver several commissions.
- Jefferson declines to deliver these commissions.
- William Marbury, along with others, petitions the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus to compel James Madison to deliver the commissions.
Take Home Points from Marbury v. Madison (1803)
- The Court denies Marbury his commission.
- Judicial review, though not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, is established through invalidating congressional legislation.
- This ruling expands the power of the Supreme Court, which uses this power sparingly to strike down federal laws.
Understanding Jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction:
- A court’s authority to hear certain cases.
- Four characteristics determining jurisdiction:
- Involvement of the federal government or Constitution.
- Types of parties (e.g., states) involved.
- Location of where the case arose.
- Seriousness of the offense involved.
Types of Jurisdiction
Original jurisdiction:
- Refers to cases that can be brought directly to the court without prior hearings in other courts.
- Courts with original jurisdiction include state trial courts.
Appellate jurisdiction:
- Refers to cases a court hears on appeal.
- Courts with appellate jurisdiction include U.S. courts of appeals and state intermediate appellate courts.
- The U.S. Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction.
Structure of U.S. Federal Court System
- Three levels of the federal court system:
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Circuit Courts of Appeal
- Federal District Courts
U.S. District Courts
- Overview:
- Lowest level of federal court system.
- Total of 94 district courts (each state has at least one; Texas has four).
- Hear both criminal and civil cases.
- Juries are responsible for verdicts.
U.S. Courts of Appeals
- Overview:
- Arranged into 12 circuits.
- Have sole appellate jurisdiction.
- No new evidence or witnesses permitted.
- Rulings are made by a panel of three judges, not a jury; sometimes these panels convene as an en banc group.
The U.S. Supreme Court
- Composition:
- Comprises nine justices, though this number has varied historically.
- Justices are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.
- Serve for life during good behavior but can be impeached.
Supreme Court Nomination Process
- Founders’ proposals for appointments included:
- Legislature appointing all judges.
- Executive appointing all judges.
- Senate appointing justices with both chambers appointing judges.
- Senate appointing all judges.
- Executive appointing with “Advice and Consent” of the Senate.
- Executive appointing unless two-thirds of the legislature disagrees.
- Senate appointing with presidential veto privileges.
Creation of the Short List
Reasons justices retire or are removed:
- Institutional: E.g., increased caseload.
- Personal: E.g., death.
- Political: E.g., alignment with president’s party.
Four criteria for Supreme Court appointments:
- Merit.
- Political ideology (e.g., strict constructionism vs. judicial interpretivism).
- Reward.
- Representation (in terms of geography, religion, race, and gender).
Nomination Announcement and Senate Judiciary Hearings
- Process:
- Senators have the opportunity to question nominees about laws, previous court decisions, and experiences.
- Nominees often do not answer questions.
Senate Confirmation Vote
- Confirmation statistics:
- Nominees confirmed: 128
- Nominees denied: 37
- Success rate: 77.58%.
Influences on Confirmation Votes
- Ideology of the nominee.
- Quality of the nominee.
Steps in Supreme Court Nomination Process
- Vacancy arises.
- Creation of a short list.
- Nomination announcement.
- Capitol Hill meet-and-greets.
- Senate Judiciary Hearings.
- Confirmation vote.
- Swearing-in ceremony.
Supreme Court Decision Process
- Choosing cases to hear:
- Process:
- Writ of certiorari.
- Role of law clerks (cert pool).
- Discuss list.
- Rule of Four (pursuant to which four justices must agree to grant a writ).
- Factors influencing whether a case is heard:
- Solicitor general’s input.
- Conflicts in lower courts.
- Amicus curiae briefs.
Deciding Cases
- Process:
- Oral argument.
- Conference.
- Opinion assignment.
- Opinion writing.
Writing Opinions
- Definition:
- An opinion is the written part of the decision that states the judgment of the majority of the Court.
- Types of opinions:
- Concurring opinion: Agrees with the majority’s decision but for different reasons.
- Dissenting opinion: Agrees with the decision but presents alternative reasoning or disagrees entirely.
Influences on Supreme Court Decisions
- Ideology:
- Judicial activism vs. judicial restraint:
- External Factors:
- Public opinion.
- Executive branch influences.
- Amicus briefs.
Citizens and the Courts
- Controversies regarding:
- The equality of treatment by the criminal justice system.
- Access to the civil justice system.
- The length of time cases take to progress through the appellate process.
- The appointment of judges versus their election.