How employees assess the quality of physical work settings
Introduction
Study on how employees assess physical work settings.
Author(s): David G. Carnevale and Jo Marie Rios.
Published in Public Productivity & Management Review, Spring 1995.
Background
Physical conditions of work have been historically overlooked compared to social relations.
Contemporary focus on physical work environments is rising due to 'sick buildings' and their health impacts.
Quality of work environments affects employee morale, productivity, and turnover.
Research Focus
Empirical test of person-environment relations in organizations.
Investigates how workers perceive surroundings and its relation to job satisfaction.
Hypotheses:
Employees assess settings based on adequacy, arrangement, symbolic features, and perceived control over their environments.
Evaluations of these elements influence overall feelings of job satisfaction.
Person-Environment Relations Model
Key Components
Objective Factors: Include space, furnishings, illumination, cleanliness, etc.
Adequacy: Employees' measurement of physical conditions relating to job satisfaction.
Arrangement: Layout affects behavior; e.g., influences interaction and feelings of isolation.
Symbolic Features: Physical spaces convey messages about authority, status, and organizational identity.
Control: Employee involvement in workspace design affects satisfaction.
Methodology
Study was conducted in a state-owned building with five organizations.
Used a survey to gather data on employee assessments, achieving an 81% response rate.
Analysis
Regression Models
Evaluated associations between physical conditions and sense of place, job satisfaction.
Key findings: Adequacy had the highest positive impact on sense of place.
Results
Significant positive relationship between quality of work environments and job satisfaction.
Adequacy, arrangement, symbolic features, and control are all positively associated with satisfaction.
Conclusions
Comprehensive assessment of physical work environments is crucial for enhancing employee attitudes.
Emphasizes the need for inclusive management practices in workspace design.
Highlights that workplaces must fit employees' needs to assure health, safety, and productivity.