Principles of Microeconomics: Trade and Comparative Advantage Lecture 2
INTERDEPENDENCE AND THE GAINS FROM TRADE
Proposition of Economics
Trade can make everyone better off.
Explains why people trade with their neighbors and nations.
Key Questions:
What do people gain from trade?
Why do people choose interdependence?
CONTENTS
Key Concepts Included:
Production possibility curve
Marginal cost as slope of Production possibilities frontier
Preferences and Marginal benefit
Allocative Efficiency
Absolute and Comparative Advantage
Gains from Trade
PRODUCTION POSSIBILITY CURVE
Scarcity of Production Inputs:
Types of Inputs: time, skilled workers, land, capital (tools, machines, computers, etc.).
Face a trade-off: dedicating resources to one area limits output in another.
Opportunity Cost: Additional resources for cars means sacrificing production of computers.
PRODUCTION POSSIBILITY CURVE EXAMPLES
Production Combinations in an Economy:
Goods: Corn and Soybeans.
Point A on Production Possibility Frontier: Full resource utilization (corn).
Producing more soybeans requires reallocating land from corn.
Points:
Feasible: Points on or within the frontier.
Unfeasible: Points outside the frontier.
Resource Movement Example:
Moving from Point A to Point B:
Resource movement from corn production to soybean yields.
Decrease in corn: 12 million tons to gain 3 million tons of soybeans.
Opportunity Cost Calculation:
Cost of producing 1 soybean = rac{12}{3} = 4 million tons of corn per million tons of soybeans.
MARGINAL COST
Increasing Marginal (Opportunity) Cost:
In moving from Point C to A, less reduction in corn is observed than from A to B.
As soybean production increases, land less productive is used first, leading to higher costs.
DECREASING MARGINAL BENEFIT
Marginal Benefit and Consumption:
First glass of water provides high enjoyment when thirsty; each subsequent glass provides less satisfaction.
Principle illustrates decreasing marginal benefit.
May reach a point of zero or negative benefit with excessive consumption.
OPTIMAL PRODUCTION
Cost-Benefit Principle:
A country should produce a good if the marginal cost is less than the marginal benefit.
Marginal costs are considered to be increasing while marginal benefits are decreasing.
Optimal production level identified at 30 tons of soybeans at equal marginal cost and benefit of $400 per ton.
TRADE
Production vs. Specialization and Trade:
Individuals can either produce all goods independently or specialize and trade.
Unique skills lead to higher collective output, where trade increases efficiency.
PARABLE OF A MODERN ECONOMY
Example Setup:
Goods: Meat and potatoes.
Participants: Cattle Rancher (Ruby) and Potato Farmer (Frank) who prefer variety.
Frank's Scenarios:
Capable of raising cattle but not efficiently; thrive at producing potatoes.
Ruby excels in both but faces land challenges with potatoes.
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
Understanding Comparative Advantage:
Absolute Advantage: Comparing producers based on productivity.
Identifies producer needing fewer inputs for goods.
Opportunity Cost: Next best alternative sacrificed for production.
Comparative advantage assessed on opportunity costs rather than inputs.
OPPORTUNITY COST EXAMPLES
Frank's Production Costs:
Time taken for 1 kg of meat: 60 minutes.
In that time, can produce rac{60}{15} = 4 kg of potatoes.
Opportunity cost of 1 kg of meat = 4 kg of potatoes.
Ruby's Costs:
Takes 20 minutes per kg of meat, yielding an opportunity cost of 2 kg of potatoes.
GAINS FROM TRADE
Principle:
Countries gain by specializing in goods they have comparative advantages in and trading.
Mutual benefits arise from trade leading to overall improved consumption.
EFFICIENCY THROUGH SPECIALIZATION AND TRADE
Specialization Impact:
Ruby’s utilization of hours leads to an increased production pattern via specialization.
Result: Consumption boost benefits both through trade arrangements.
SUMMARY OF GAINS FROM TRADE
Situation without Trade:
Frank: 4 kg meat, 16 kg potatoes.
Ruby: 12 kg meat, 24 kg potatoes.
Situation with Trade:
Frank's production becomes 0 kg meat, 32 kg potatoes.
Ruby produces 18 kg meat, 12 kg potatoes.
Net Increase in Consumption:
Both see improvement in resource consumption after engagement in trade.
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE IN ACTION
Example Calculations:
Frank’s original production aids Ruby in enhancing her output alongside trading benefits both.
Each benefits from a decrease in opportunity costs relative to trade.
ECONOMIC APPLICATIONS OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
International Trade:
Imports: Goods/services produced abroad and sold domestically.
Exports: Goods/services produced domestically and sold abroad.
Japan vs. Canada:
Japan's opportunity cost of a car is 2 tonnes of food; Canada’s is 1/2 car for 1 tonne.
Trading results in enhanced production capacities for both countries.