Lecture 8: Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan
Introduction: Context
Thirty Years War (1618-1648)
Began with the Protestant Revolt in Bohemia
Ended with the Peace of Westphalia in 1648
Massive religious war in Europe (Protestants vs Catholics)
Caused destruction, instability, and death
Showed what happens when authority collapses
English Civil War
Puritan War and Two Civil Wars
King vs Parliament
The English Civil Wars (1642–1651), often called the Puritan Revolution or Wars of the Three Kingdoms, were a series of conflicts between Parliamentarians (supported by Puritans) and Royalists (supporters of Charles I) over religious freedom, the King's divine right, and political power, resulting in the execution of Charles I, the rise of Oliver Cromwell, and the temporary creation of a Commonwealth
Issues:
Religious Liberty
Sovereign
Social and Economic Issues
Aftermath of the Civil War
Parliament won against the monarch
Provided the background for the Leviathan
Hobbes saw:
Violence
Political collapse
Fear and insecurity
So his philosophy is basically:
“Without strong authority, society falls into chaos.”
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)
Son of a vicar who left his family
Learned Greek and Latin at the age of six
Went to Oxford at the age of 15
Worked for the Cavendish family
Fled to France in 1640
While in France, he taught Charles II (then a prince) from 1646 to 1648
Went back to England in 1651
Published De Cive (1642) and Leviathan (1651)
Leviathan
Considered as “the first general theory of politics in the English language”
Considered man as equal in terms of the mind and the body
Due to this equality, it is considered as “source of trouble and misery”
Social contract as “made between subjects and subjects, and not subjects and sovereign”
Leviathan as strengthening of the doctrine of absolute state
However, it is not a defense of totalitarianism
a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state
Nature of Man
Both appetite and aversion exist in man (also love and hate)
Good - object of man’s desire
Evil - object of hate and aversion
Vile - contempt
In terms of life, there is no finis ultimus (utmost aim) or summum bonum (greatest good), but its felicity “based on continual progress of desire”
Inclination of man to desire power which can only be distinguished by death
State of Nature
Nature made equal in terms of the faculties of the body and mind
Brawniest man can kill a weak person, but a smart person (weak) can kill the brawny through other means
Once two people have the same likes, they become enemies
As enemies, they might “destroy or subdue one another”
Three causes of quarrel:
Competition - for resources
Diffidence (fear) - for safety
Glory - for reputation
Life outside of society, due to conflictual nature, is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short
Fear as death as “passion that incline men to peace”
Social Contract
Right of Nature (jus naturale)
liberty of man to use power for his preservation
Liberty
no external impediments
Law of Nature (lex naturalis)
Based on reason that man should not harm his own life, or take away the means for another person to preserve his own life
“that every man, ought to endeavor peace, as far as he has hope of obtaining it; and when he cannot obtain it, that he may seek, and use, all helps, and advantages of war.”
Contract
Mutual transferring of right (voluntary)
Covenant
Performance
Laws of Nature
If there is no covenant, there are no unjust actions as man has every right to do his own thing
If there is a covenant, breaking it means injustice
Injustice as non-performance of covenant
Laws of nature as eternal and immutable as injustice can never be made lawful
Good and evil signify a person’s appetite and aversion
In the state of nature, private appetite determines good and evil, but under a social contract, good and evil are defined based on the agreement by people entering it
Political Power
To erect a common power, man must give up power and strength to a man or an assembly of men that can rule over them
Commonwealth (Civitas)
Established for peace and common defense
Sovereign
The one who holds sovereign power
How to become sovereign?
Commonwealth by acquisition - natural force (i.e. parent to children)
Commonwealth by institution - agreement
Liberty and Law
Liberty as the absence of impediments to the exercise of freedom
Fear of law and liberty are consistent
In the same way that liberty and necessity are consistent
Creation of commonwealth made people wear artificial chains called civil law
Civil law as “rules, which the commonwealth hath commanded him, by word, writing, or other sufficient sign of the will, to make use of, for the distinction of right and wrong; that is to say, of what is contrary and what is not contrary to the rule”
While there are laws, there is a need to institutionalize a mechanism for its enforcement, hence the need for a sovereign not bound by these rules
Nevertheless, the sovereign must protect everyone
Sovereign Power
Sovereign
Absolute powers not subjected to civil law
In commonwealths, there are different types of sovereign
Monarchy - one man
Aristocracy or Democracy - assembly
Diseases of commonwealth (seditious doctrines)
Private man as judge of good and evil
Whatever a man does against his conscience is sin
What makes a law good?
No unjust laws
Needful, for the good of people, perspicuous (lucid)
People depend on the sovereign “the soul of the commonwealth”