Cognitive Approach to explaining depression
The cognitive approach explains depression in terms of faulty thinking patterns - the idea that how we interpret events shapes how we feel.
Beck’s Cognitive Theory of Depression:
Developed by Aaron Beck.
Negative Triad:
Beck suggested depressed individuals have a negative schema, leading to a traid of negative thoughts:
1 - Negative view of the self
e.g. “I’m worthless”
2 - Negative view of the world
e.g. “Everything is against me”
3 - Negative view of the future
e.g. “Things will never get better”
Faulty Information Processing:
Depressed people also show thinking errors, such as:
Overgeneralisation (one bad event = everything is bad)
Catastrophising (expecting the worst)
Selective abstraction (focusing only of negatives)
Role of Schemas:
Schemas are mental frameworks developed for experience (often childhood)
Negative schemas bias how information is interpreted → maintaining depression
Ellis’s ABC Model:
Proposed by Albert Ellis.
ABC Components
A - Activating event Something happens (e.g. failing a test)
B - Beliefs Interpretation of the event
C - Consequences Emotional/behavioural outcome
Key Idea:
Its not the event (A) that causes depression, but the belief (B) about it.
Irrational Beliefs:
Ellis identified common irrational beliefs:
“I must succeed at everything”
“Everyone must like me”
“Life should always be fair”
When these are violated → negative emotional consequences (C), such as depression
Summary:
Beck: Depression comes from negative schemas → negative traid + biases
Ellis: Depression comes from irrational beliefs about events (ABC Model)
Evaluation (AO3 points)
Strengths:
Strong Research Support
Studies show depressed individuals do have negative thinking patterns (supporting Beck’s negative triad).
For example, research using questionnaires found depressed ppts interpreted situations more negatively.
→ Supports the idea that cognition plays a key role in depression.
Practical Applications (CBT)
The approach led to Cognitive Behavioual Therapy (CBT).
CBT challenges negative thoughts and replaces them with more realistic ones.
Proven to be effective treating depression.
→ This gives the theory real-world value.
Recognises Role of Thought Processes
Unlike behaviourist explanations, it focuses on internal mental processes.
Provides a more complete explanation of depression.
Weaknesses
Cause vs Effect Issue
Negative thinking may be a symptom of depression, not the cause.
It’s unclear whether faulty cognition comes before or after depression.
→ Weakens the claim that cognition alone explains depression.
Ignores other factors
Biological factors (e.g. genetics, neurotransmitters)
Social factors (life events, trauma)
→ Depression is likely multi-factoral, so this is reductionist.
Not All Depression Involves Faulty Thinking
Some people have realistic negative views (e.g. difficult life circumstances).
Known as depressive realism.
→ Suggests the model doesn’t apply to everyone.
The cogntive approach is well-supported and useful in treatment, but is limited by reductionism and issues with causality.