Stalin and Stalinism - Summary
1. Introduction: The Problem
In 1945, the USSR's rise to power prompted the West to analyze its system.
The Soviet model challenged capitalism by rejecting the market, private ownership, and the rule of law.
The concept of totalitarianism emerged, portraying the USSR as a dictatorship with total control enforced by coercion.
The Communist Party had a monopoly, suppressing opposition and religion, and using pervasive propaganda.
Academic research in the Soviet Union was restricted.
2. Historical Perspectives
Soviet émigrés provided information, but their bias was questioned.
The Smolensk archives offered detailed insights into Soviet policy.
Comparisons were drawn between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany due to similarities in political power, goals, and methods of control.
Fear of communism in America led to McCarthyism and concerns about World War III.
3. Revisionist Interpretations
The Vietnam War triggered a reassessment of the totalitarian model, leading to revisionism in the 1970s.
Revisionist historians argued that the Bolsheviks had support and challenged the view of a coup led by foreign activists.
Stephen Cohen argued for Bukharin's gradualist approach as a feasible alternative to Stalin's policies.
Revisionists were criticized for downplaying the brutality of the Stalinist period.
4. Social History
Social historians researched the level of support for the Stalinist regime from below.
Sheila Fitzpatrick studied the new cultural elite and social mobility.
Lynne Viola, Hiroaki Kuromiya, and William J. Chase examined workers and collectivization.
Some scholars viewed the Soviet Union as a bureaucratic state that exploited workers.
Moshe Lewin criticized the Stalinist system for its hierarchical nature and use of coercion.
The Great Purges were documented by Robert Conquest, leading to debates between totalitarians and revisionists.
5. Post-Revisionism
Post-revisionism emerged in the 1990s, emphasizing ideology and cultural history.
Scholars drew inspiration from French and German social theorists.
Stephen Kotkin presented Stalinism as a new civilization in his study of Magnitogorsk.
Cultural studies focused on everyday discourse, rituals, and practices.
Terry Martin examined Soviet nations and nationalities, noting the unintended consequences of affirmative action.
Oleg Khlevniuk's research on repression during the 1930s, based on archives, revealed new insights into the Stalin era.