L1 Monopoly
Loughborough Business School Intermediate Microeconomics Lecture Notes
Overview
Course: Intermediate Microeconomics (ECB002)
Semester: Semester 2
Lecture Number: Lecture 18
Topic: Monopoly and its Consequences
Lecturer: Huw Edwards
Institution: Loughborough University
Date: Winter/Spring 2026
Page 1
Introduction to Loughborough Business School and details of the course.
Page 2
Topics Covered
Monopoly and its consequences as explored in Perloff Chapter 11 and Varian Chapter 32.
Page 3
Historical Figures in Monopolies
John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937): Established dominance in the oil industry.
J.P. Morgan (1837-1913): Influential in banking and corporate finance.
Henry Ford I (1863-1937): Revolutionized automobile manufacturing with mass production.
Page 4
Contemporary Monopolies
Discussion on how modern technology has led to new monopolistic entities, reminiscent of historical 'robber barons'.
Page 5
Nature of Monopoly Power
Clarification that industries dominated by mega-corporations do not conform to perfect competition.
Inquiry into the consequences of such oligopolies and adjustments needed in economic theory to accommodate them.
Page 6
Understanding Monopoly Power
Pure Monopolies: Explained as either natural monopolies or those enabled by technological dependencies.
Natural Monopolies: Occur due to significant economies of scale or network effects leading to reliance on a single supplier (e.g., Windows OS).
Page 7
Legal Monopolies
Firms may have monopoly power due to legal or patenting reasons.
Example: Patents on medicines that restrict others from producing a drug for a specified duration.
Page 8
Key Assumptions of Monopoly
Price-Makers: Sellers can set prices rather than take them.
Non-Strategic Behavior: Sellers do not strategize based on competitors since they face no rivals.
Entry Barriers: Complete barriers prevent new firms from entering the industry.
Price-Takers on Buyer Side: Buyers must accept whatever price the monopolist sets.
Page 9
Total and Marginal Revenue
Total Revenue Formula:
R = P imes Y
where $R$ is total revenue, $P$ is price, and $Y$ is output.Marginal Revenue Formula: rac{dR}{dY} = P + Y rac{dP}{dY}
Note: The last term is negative for monopolists, indicating they must lower prices on existing sales to increase sales volume.
Page 10
Sales Dynamics for Monopolists
Firms must balance two effects:
Fall in Sales (Demand)
Rise in Unit Price (Price-side adjustment)
Page 11
Marginal Revenue Curve Illustration
Diagram including:
PM: Price of monopoly
P: Price on demand curve
MRM: Marginal revenue curve for the monopolist
Notes on the Harberger Triangle illustrating welfare loss due to monopolistic practices.
Page 12
Relation to Elasticity
Condition for maximization: MC = dR/dY = P + Y rac{dP}{dY}
Relates price elasticity with marginal cost and revenue:
MC = P rac{(1 + 1/ ext{ε})}{ ext{where ε is the price elasticity}}Definitions: Price elasticity is defined as a negative number.
Page 13
Elasticity Values
Examples of elasticity:
-2, -4, -1
Calculation examples:
When ε = -2: 1/(1-(1/2))=2
When ε = -4: 1/(1-(1/4))=4/3
When ε = -1: 1/(1-(1/1)) = ext{infinity}
Page 14
Lerner Index
Definition of the Lerner Index: L = rac{(P - MC)}{P} = - rac{1}{ ext{ε}}
Interpretation: A higher Lerner index indicates greater monopoly power in pricing.
Page 15
Effects of Taxation on Monopolists
Tax implementation on a monopolist:
Specific tax ($£t$ per unit output):
Original price set as:
P = rac{MC}{1 + 1/ ext{ε}}Post-tax pricing:
P' = rac{(MC + t)}{1 + 1/ ext{ε}}Price increase can exceed the tax amount due to monopoly pricing strategies.
Page 16
Profit Implications of Taxation
Despite raised prices due to tax, monopolist profits typically decline as illustrated in the supplied demand and marginal revenue graphs.
Profit Loss: Changes in demand, marginal revenue, and cost illustrate adjusted profit dynamics.
Page 17-20
Efficiency Effects of Monopoly
Consumer Surplus Loss: On the demand and marginal cost diagram highlighting consumer surplus lost when monopolistic pricing occurs.
Producer Surplus Transfer: Explains producer surplus transfers and loss associated with monopolistic behavior.
Deadweight Loss: Repeated illustrations of welfare loss due to monopoly pricing, emphasizing inefficiencies in markets.
Page 21
Sources of Monopoly Power
Definition of a Natural Monopoly: A scenario where one firm can supply the total market output at a lower cost than multiple firms could while considering fixed costs.
Page 22
Characteristics of Natural Monopolies
Examples include public utility sectors such as:
Water Supply
Electricity Distribution
Gas Distribution
Telecommunication Networks
Broadcasting Services
Regulatory Importance: Segregating natural monopoly functions from competitive areas to encourage competition.
Page 23
Government Actions Affecting Monopolies
Examples of government-sponsored monopolies include:
Patents: Offering temporary monopoly benefits to incentivize R&D.
Duration of patents raises discussions on optimal longevity before competition resumes.
Page 24
Policy Responses to Monopolies in the UK
Institutional bodies regulating monopolies:
Competition Commission
Regulatory Bodies (e.g., OFWAT, OFGEM).
Page 25
Optimal Price Regulation
Figure: Optimal Price Regulation depicted with market demand, price per unit calculations, and regulated demand affecting units produced.
Page 26
Challenges in Regulation
Identified issues in regulatory landscapes:
Firms possess advanced knowledge and can manipulate information presented to regulatory bodies.
Illustrates potential distortions in firm behavior when subjected to governmental pricing regulations.