court cases

Case: Bradwell v. Illinois (1872) /

  • Issue: Does the Privileges and Immunities Clause protect a woman’s right to practice law?

  • Ruling: No. The Court upheld Illinois’ refusal to grant a woman a law license.

  • Legal Basis: Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Reinforced gender discrimination in employment, citing traditional roles.

  • Date: 1872


Case: Goesaert v. Cleary (1948) /

  • Issue: Does a Michigan law prohibiting women from bartending unless related to the bar owner violate the Constitution?

  • Ruling: No. The Court upheld the law, citing a rational basis for regulating morals.

  • Legal Basis: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Allowed sex-based occupational restrictions.

  • Date: 1948


Case: Brown v. Board of Education (1954) /

  • Issue: Does racial segregation in public schools violate the Equal Protection Clause?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional.

  • Legal Basis: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson and declared “separate but equal” unconstitutional.

  • Date: 1954


Case: Miranda v. Arizona (1966) /

  • Issue: Does the Fifth Amendment require law enforcement to inform individuals of their rights during interrogation?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court established the requirement to provide “Miranda warnings.”

  • Legal Basis: Fifth Amendment.

  • Impact: Strengthened protections against self-incrimination during police interrogations.

  • Date: 1966


Case: Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company (1969) /

  • Issue: Does a refusal to promote a woman based on sex violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court found this discriminatory practice unconstitutional.

  • Legal Basis: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  • Impact: One of the first cases to enforce Title VII for sex discrimination.

  • Date: 1969


Case: Diaz v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc. (1971) /

  • Issue: Can an airline refuse to hire male flight attendants based on customer preference?

  • Ruling: No. The Court ruled this practice violated Title VII.

  • Legal Basis: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  • Impact: Challenged “bona fide occupational qualifications” based on sex stereotypes.

  • Date: 1971


Case: Reed v. Reed (1971) /

  • Issue: Does a law favoring men over women as estate administrators violate the Equal Protection Clause?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court struck down the law.

  • Legal Basis: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Marked the first time the Court invalidated a law for sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.

  • Date: 1971


Case: Craig v. Boren (1976) /

  • Issue: Does a law setting different drinking ages for men and women violate the Equal Protection Clause?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court ruled the law unconstitutional.

  • Legal Basis: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Established intermediate scrutiny for gender discrimination cases.

  • Date: 1976


Case: U.S. v. Virginia (1996) /

  • Issue: Does the Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admissions policy violate the Equal Protection Clause?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court ruled the policy unconstitutional.

  • Legal Basis: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Reinforced intermediate scrutiny for gender-based policies.

  • Date: 1996


Case: Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989) /

  • Issue: Can gender stereotyping be a basis for workplace discrimination claims under Title VII?

  • Ruling: Yes. Adverse employment decisions based on gender stereotypes violate Title VII.

  • Legal Basis: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  • Impact: Expanded workplace protections against gender stereotyping.

  • Date: 1989


Case: Jespersen v. Harrah’s Operating Company, Inc. (2006) /

  • Issue: Does a grooming policy requiring women to wear makeup violate Title VII?

  • Ruling: No. The Court upheld the policy, ruling it did not impose unequal burdens.

  • Legal Basis: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  • Impact: Limited the scope of sex discrimination claims for appearance-based policies.

  • Date: 2006


Case: Romer v. Evans (1996) /

  • Issue: Does a Colorado amendment prohibiting protections for LGBTQ individuals violate the Constitution?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court struck down the amendment.

  • Legal Basis: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Established that laws targeting LGBTQ individuals must have a rational basis.

  • Date: 1996


Case: Lawrence v. Texas (2003) /

  • Issue: Does a law criminalizing consensual same-sex conduct violate the Constitution?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court invalidated the law.

  • Legal Basis: Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Overturned Bowers v. Hardwick and expanded LGBTQ rights.

  • Date: 2003


Case: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) /

  • Issue: Does the Constitution guarantee same-sex couples the right to marry?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court recognized marriage equality.

  • Legal Basis: Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

  • Date: 2015


Case: Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia (2020) /

  • Issue: Does Title VII prohibit workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court interpreted Title VII as protecting LGBTQ employees.

  • Legal Basis: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

  • Impact: Extended workplace protections to LGBTQ employees.

  • Date: 2020


Case: B.P.J. v. West Virginia State Board of Education (2024) /

  • Issue: Does a law prohibiting transgender students from participating in school sports consistent with their gender identity violate Title IX?

  • Ruling: Yes. The Court found the law unconstitutional.

  • Legal Basis: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.

  • Impact: Affirmed protections for transgender students under Title IX.

  • Date: 2024


Case: Roe v. Wade (1973) /

  • Issue: Does the Constitution protect a woman’s right to abortion?

  • Ruling: Yes, prior to viability. Established a trimester framework.

  • Legal Basis: Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Recognized abortion as a constitutional right.

  • Date: 1973


Case: Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) /

  • Issue: Can states regulate abortion without imposing an undue burden?

  • Ruling: Yes, but the undue burden standard must be met.

  • Legal Basis: Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  • Impact: Modified Roe by removing the trimester framework.

  • Date: 1992


Case: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) /

  • Issue: Does the Constitution protect the right to abortion?

  • Ruling: No. The Court overturned Roe and Casey.

  • Legal Basis: Rejected substantive due process as a basis for abortion rights.

  • Impact: Returned abortion regulation to states.

  • Date: 2022