Lectures 2 & 3 - Field Methods, Estimating Abundance, Scale Sensitivity
LECTURES 2&3 - FIELD METHODS, ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE & SCALE SENSITIVITY
Dr. Joanna Zigouris
Saint Mary's University
Learning Objectives
Estimate population size.
Understand when to apply quadrat sampling versus mark-recapture methods.
Grasp the role of scale in ecology.
Estimating Population Size
Complete counting of individuals (true census) is often impossible.
Most methods rely on sampling techniques:
Quadrat Sampling
Line Transect Sampling
Mark-Recapture
Quadrat Sampling
Define the sampling area and randomly select locations.
Place quadrat (fixed area) and count all individuals within it.
Calculate the average number per quadrat, then multiply by the size of the sampling area.
Typically involves 1 m x 1 m or 0.5 m x 0.5 m quadrats.
This method works best when individuals are relatively sessile.
Random Plots in Quadrat Sampling
Importance of random sampling in ecological studies:
Example from Denali National Park, with researchers using randomly located quadrats.
Sampling must include diverse areas (both "good" and "bad" sites) to avoid overestimating population size.
Line-Transect Surveys
These surveys offer a method for counting species along a linear path.
Challenges with Quadrats
Quadrats are less effective for sampling mobile animal populations.
Mark-Recapture Method
Capture and Mark: First stage involves capturing and marking individuals.
Resampling: In second stage, animals are recaptured to determine the proportion that are marked.
Photographic and Genetic Mark-Recapture Techniques
Photographic: Utilizes images for identification (Durban et al. 2010).
Genetic: Use of genetic markers to track population dynamics.
Lincoln-Peterson Estimator
Formula:
N = (M * n) / m
N = Estimated population size
M = Number marked on first visit
n = Total captured second visit
m = Number recaptured (with marks).
Lincoln-Peterson Index Details
Additional details about the estimator:
M = Number marked in first sample (t1).
m = Number of animals recaptured in second sample (t2).
n = Total animals captured in second sample (t2).
N = Estimated population (unknown value).
Chapman Estimator
Provides correction for small sample sizes:
Formula: N = ((M + 1)(n + 1) - 1) / (m + 1)
Where M = number marked in first sample, n = animals captured in second visit, m = animals recaptured.
Assumptions of Mark-Recapture Method
No change in population size during sampling period.
All individuals have an equal chance of being captured and recaptured.
Characteristics like being trap-shy or trap-happy can affect this.
Sufficient time must allow for mixing of marked individuals.
Marks should remain intact until the second sampling.
Assessing Estimate Accuracy
Variance formula to determine accuracy:
Variance = ((M + 1)(n + 1)(m - 1)(n - m))
Standard Deviation calculations and confidence intervals could be computed.
Precision and Accuracy
Relationships:
Low precision can lead to low accuracy, and vice versa.
High precision typically indicates higher accuracy in estimations.
Population Dispersion Patterns
Characterizes spacing of individuals:
Random
Clustered
Evenly spaced
Scale Sensitivity in Ecology
Key Concepts
Grain: Size of the sampling unit or resolution.
Extent: Size of the study area.
Questions on Scale Sensitivity
Optimal quadrat size for estimating population density?
Are species distributed randomly, evenly, or clumpily?
Evaluating pros and cons associated with quadrat sizes.
Conducting Field Experiments
Always employ random sampling to assess abundance and distribution.
Properties of Random Sampling:
Unbiased: Each unit has an equal chance of being selected.
Independent: Selection of one unit does not affect the others.
Bias in Sampling Procedures
Example of potential biases:
Students placing quadrats in "typical" areas, leading to unintentional biases based on subjective perceptions.
Random Sampling Examples
Options that represent random sampling:
Blindly dialing phone numbers for surveys.
Selecting students by surname through a random letter pick.
Voluntary census forms.
Case Study: Eastern Grey Squirrel Population
Drey density correlates with squirrel density.
Study focused on estimating densities and landscape features' effects on drey densities.
Scale-Sensitive Density Estimations
Research demonstrates:
Drey density declines with area extent.
Finer scales reveal higher density estimates compared to coarser scales.
Conclusion: Correlation Between Density and Landscape Features
Drey density has variable correlation with building density:
Effective at coarse scales, but not when analyzing finer scales.