18. Peers and Friendships
Peers
Companions who are usually around the same age and the same developmental level
Peers function as equals
Foster different kinds of socialization and social skills: compromising, competition
Helps develop prosocial skills: sharing, collaboration
Unlike parent-child interaction as the child is the subordinate, use their authority about social rules, etc
Preference for peer companions vs preference for adult companions
As children grow older, their preference for companionship from caregivers gets lower, and grows for peers
Increases influence from peers: Behaviours, decisions, choices
As children get older, they are more under the influence of companions
The role of peers in socialization
Peers are reinforcers of desired behaviours
3-4 years old peers increase or decrease behaviours
sharing toys → desired thing, gold star for good behaviour → Increase in prosocial behaviour
Stand up to bullying, saying no to people that can be trying to get them to do things they dont want to do.
Kids are reciprocal to reinforcements
** Peers in collaborative small groups tend to show better performance
Kids try to model the “popular kids” behaviour
Peers and the self are intwined
Kids want to be associated with the popularity and want to be apart of the cool group
Wanting to dress like them → becomes a part of their identity
Social comparison → assessing their own abilities based on the social comparison they are making with others
Peers as guides and instructors
provide opportunities for developing skills, to get others to get to know you in a setting outside your home
Peers are who you have to get in with setting your sense of self outside your home
Soccer, hockey → social contacts to be with peers in tutorial based setting → opportunities of contact
Peer group formation when peers become friends
Peer - hangout with one another, measuring up against
Friends - specific commitment
A reciprocal commitment between 2 people who see themselves as equals
→ Effects of friendships
support and validation
social and cognitive skill development
Also have negative effects of antisocial behaviour
Bullying, aggression, substance abuse → GROUPS that reinforce this behaviour
Changes in friendship with development
Childhood-adulthood friendships
Increasing disclosure and mutuality
Honest sharing of personal information, focus with problem solving
For young girls its boys, “passing notes”
Self-disclosure can be used as a weapon
have to trust the person will keep the secret
Changing expectations of the friendship as we get older
Young friendships → reciprocal helpfulness
16-17 → emotional support is a core component to good friendship
Peer Acceptance
Middle school and adolescence focus
→ peer nomination method
→ Go to classroom of kids, party and having to select kids from the class to invite. Pattern of kids who are always invited, and others that don’t get any
Popular
Always invited
Average
some nominations but not as many as popular
Neglected
very few nominations, “they dont reallty think about them”
Controversial '
Love vs hate with peers
Rejected - Aggressive vs. Non-Aggressive
Dont get invited, kids dont like them
Aggressive → thats why they dont like them, bullies
Low self control, behaviour problems
Non-aggressive → socially awkward,
factors in peer status
Social cognitive skills are critical to being liked by peers
children who know how to react appropriately to peers are more likely to be liked by peers
Asks questions, more prosocial behaviour, extraversion, more approachable
How to approach a group matters, whether or not you will be or not be included in the group
** Social cues, how they align with the group and how they communicate the similar behaviour with the group
Physical appearance
Physically attractive people have higher IQ, reinforcement from experiences
Gender
girls with girl groups, boys with boy groups
Cross gender friendships → more socially skilled
Age & name
Children are more likely to be friendly and become friends with kids their age
Name → Children want to hang out with other children with familiar names
Identity and how names are attached to it
Children are more likely tot be friendly to a peer that has a familiar name
Kids deemed socially competent vs socially incompetent
Competent → higher cognitive processing skills
Interpreting social environment
Consequences of Peer status
Popularity and average during adolescence, does it matter?
Low peer status → loneliness, low self esteem
long-term consequences, poor academic achievement, depression and anxiety
shy children are slower in marrying and establishing a career, and having a family
Peer status stable overtime?
can change
peer rejection stays stable, especially for rejected children.
why ?
Personal traits → temperament
Children that are popular, become better integrated but can have life events that can change how they view social contexts