Implications for Crime Prevention Lecture Notes
Week 11: Implications for Crime Prevention
Associate Professor Jesse Cale
Crime Prevention Lecture Outline
Levels of prevention
Criminal Justice Interventions
Developmental crime prevention
Community crime prevention
Situational crime prevention
Levels of Prevention
Tertiary Prevention/Intervention:
Involves interventions aimed at individuals who have already committed crimes.
Focuses on reducing the risks of recidivism and limiting the consequences of criminal behavior.
Secondary Prevention:
Targets individuals or groups who are at risk of engaging in crime.
Involves measures such as diversion programs, educational initiatives, and support services to prevent future criminal behavior.
Primary Prevention:
Aimed at the general population to stop crime before it occurs.
Includes initiatives like community development, policies to improve social conditions, and the promotion of social cohesion.
Crime Prevention Strategies
Criminal Justice Interventions
Detection and Investigation:
Focuses on identifying criminal activity and ensuring offenders are brought to justice.
Deterrence:
General Deterrence: Aims to deter the general public by making an example out of offenders.
Specific Deterrence: Targets individual offenders to discourage them from committing future crimes.
Incapacitation:
Includes strategies that physically restrain offenders, such as imprisonment.
Selective Incapacitation: Refers to targeting specific offenders for longer sentences based on risk assessments.
Offender Rehabilitation:
Aims to address the underlying causes of criminal behavior through programs that promote change and reintegration into society.
Roles of Police, Courts, and Corrections
General Deterrence (Primary):
The criminal justice system imposes penalties that deter crime at a societal level.
Specific Deterrence (Tertiary):
Aimed at individuals to discourage repeat offenses.
Incapacitation (Tertiary):
Involves keeping offenders away from potential victims to reduce crime rates.
Rehabilitation (Tertiary):
Focuses on changing offenders’ behaviors and reintegrating them into the community.
Goals of Corrections
Retribution:
Aims to restore moral balance by providing deserved punishment.
Incapacitation:
Physically restraining or removing an offender from society to prevent crime.
Deterrence:
Based on the rational choice theory; seeks to deter future crimes by imposing penalties.
Distinction between general deterrence (societal impact) and specific deterrence (individual impact).
Rehabilitation:
Involves identifying and addressing the causes of criminal behavior through counseling, education, and social services.
Negative Effects of Imprisonment
Criminalization:
Imprisonment may create a deviant subculture, reinforcing negative attitudes and behaviors amongst inmates.
Example: Group polarization can exacerbate deviant behaviors.
Prisonisation:
Refers to the learning of prison culture and rules, leading to culture shock upon release.
Varying Outcomes of Interventions
Fines:
Monetary penalties imposed on offenders.
Probation and Fines:
When combined, result in 25% lower recidivism rates compared to probation alone.
Scared Straight Programs:
Evidence suggests potential for iatrogenesis, where interventions may exacerbate the problem rather than help.
Boot Camps:
Generally ineffective in preventing further criminal behavior.
Three Strikes Law:
Studies indicate results are inconclusive regarding effectiveness.
Death Penalty:
Uncertain impact on crime prevention; lacks definitive evidence.
Home Detention:
Shows promise as it is linked to lower recidivism rates.
Creating Pathways to Prevention
Developmental Crime Prevention
Aims to reduce the number of potential offenders by targeting risk and protective factors throughout the life course.
Emphasizes early intervention with at-risk groups and the need for continuous support.
Points of Intervention
Prenatal:
Address issues like substance abuse, adolescent pregnancy, and poor prenatal care.
Focus on family support and education.
Infancy:
Concentrates on attachment issues and inappropriate parenting.
Implement parent training and early education programs.
Preschool:
Targets appropriateness of parenting, addressing problem behaviors and peer difficulties.
Includes child training and teacher training initiatives.
School:
Addresses academic failure, peer rejection, and inconsistent discipline.
Involves peer group training to foster supportive relationships.
Adolescence:
Tackles issues like teenage pregnancy, risk-taking behaviors, antisocial peers, and lack of parental support.
Community support and anti-bullying initiatives are crucial at this stage.
Adulthood:
Focuses on unemployment, poverty, and homelessness.
Involves social and economic development strategies.
Community Crime Prevention Initiatives
Neighborhood Watch Programs:
Community mobilization to address local crime dynamics.
Community-Building Initiatives:
Examples include creating recreational facilities and urban renewal projects.
These initiatives are generally more sociological than psychological.
Situational Crime Prevention
Aims to reduce criminogenic features of potential crime sites through environmental design and management.
Theoretical Framework
Based on Rational Choice Theory (Cornish & Clarke, 1986):
Treats offenders as active decision-makers conducting a cost-benefit analysis of criminal opportunities.
Highlights the role of opportunity and provocation in crime occurrence.
Applies a micro-focus on specific crime types and geographical locations.
Techniques of Situational Crime Prevention (Clarke's 25 Techniques)
Increase the Effort:
Hardening targets, controlling access to facilities, and strengthening formal surveillance.
Increase the Risk:
Extending guardianship, assisting natural surveillance, and reinforcing peer pressures against offending.
Reduce the Rewards:
Concealing targets, denying benefits, and disrupting markets for stolen goods.
Reduce Provocations:
Reducing frustrations and stress in environments that may provoke crime.
Remove Excuses:
Setting rules, posting instructions, and identifying property to reinforce accountability.
Case Studies
Car Theft:
Notable reduction in car thefts linked to introduction of steering locks on new models (Webb, 1997).
Motorcycle Theft:
Decrease observed after mandatory helmet laws were enforced (Webb, 1997).
Obscene Calls:
Introduction of caller ID led to a 25% reduction in obscene communications (Clarke, 1997).
Graffiti in Subways:
Persistent cleaning and maintenance efforts eliminated subway graffiti (Sloan-Howitt & Kelling, 1990).
Physical Assaults:
A 52% drop in physical assaults in nightclubs following 'best practice' interventions (Homel et al, 1997).
Design Against Crime
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
Founded on the premise that crime is influenced by the design of physical environments.
Explores the roles of architecture and urban planning in crime prevention efforts.
Key Concepts in CPTED
Territoriality:
Refers to the inherent tendency of individuals to claim and defend space against intruders.
Individuals are more likely to care for spaces they feel ownership over, using territorial markers to deter intruders.
Defensible Space:
Utilizes environmental design to enhance territoriality and reduce crime.
Incorporates elements such as natural surveillance and access control.
Characteristics of Defensible Spaces
Vulnerable vs. Defensible:
Lack of clear boundaries increases vulnerability; clear boundaries promote defensibility.
Poor lighting may create unsafe conditions, while well-lit areas enhance safety.
Designing Products Against Crime
Involves incorporating crime-prevention features into industrial design.
Companies are encouraged to assume responsibility for their products' potential misuse.
Examples of Theft-Resistant Designs
Plastic Beer Glasses:
Concept designed to reduce alcohol-related altercations in public spaces.
Theft-Proof Café Chair:
Design aimed at preventing theft in outdoor café settings.
Theft-Proof Bicycle:
Incorporates features specifically tailored to deter bicycle theft.
Vandal-proof Signs:
Created to withstand vandalism and protect information displayed in public areas.
Displacement of Crime
The theory that preventative measures in one area may simply shift criminal activity to another area.
Types of displacement may include changes in place, time, target, tactic, or crime type.
Arguments Against Displacement
Critics argue that focusing solely on displacement underestimates the influences of opportunity.
Most studies have documented some displacement, but none has confirmed that displacement is exhaustive (i.e., 100%).