Introduction to Forensic Science and Physical Evidence
Note-Taking Procedures and Class Requirements
Paper Notes Requirement: Notes should be organized and written on paper.
Submission Details: Notes are submitted at the conclusion of each lecture for a total of .
Lecture Priorities:
Active listening and active participation take precedence over raw note writing.
Notes should not be a word-for-word copy of presented material to prevent wrist strain.
Reference slides are permanently accessible on Canvas.
Introduction and History of Forensic Science
Etymology of Forensics: The term "forensics" derives from the Latin phrase meaning "of the Forum."
Core Definition: Forensic science is the application of scientific principles to investigate crimes and process physical or digital evidence.
Pioneer of Forensic Science:
Edmond Locard: Recognized as the first proper forensic scientist.
Historical Milestone (1910): In 1910, Edmond Locard requested and established a formal scientific laboratory in the attic of a police station in France.
Locard's Exchange Principle: Formulated by Edmond Locard, this foundational principle of forensic science dictates: "every contact leaves a trace."
Categories of Physical Evidence
Physical evidence is grouped into four primary functional categories:
Inceptive Evidence:
Definition: Evidence that initiates an investigation by indicating or suggesting that a crime was actually committed rather than an accidental occurrence.
Context and Examples: A burning house alone does not automatically demonstrate criminal intent; however, finding an accelerant gas can and matches at the scene serves as inceptive evidence that triggers an official criminal investigation.
Identifying Evidence:
Definition: Evidence capable of identifying that a specific individual or specific object was present at the scene of a crime.
Context and Examples:
Personal Identification: Fingerprints and DNA profiles explicitly verify whether a victim or suspect was physically present at the scene.
Object Identification: A recovered bullet from a crime scene indicates the specific type of firearm utilized or matches the exact unique gun fired.
Associative Evidence:
Definition: Evidence that connects or associates a crime with a specific person, place, or object, without definitively confirming that the person was physically present during the actual commission of the crime.
Context and Examples: If a murder occurs at a workplace while an individual is the sole working employee on site, that circumstance acts as associative evidence linking the employee to the crime, regardless of actual guilt or innocence.
Corroborative Evidence:
Definition: Evidence that supports, confirms, or strengthens connections established by other pieces of evidence, statements, or accusations.
Context and Examples: Corroborative evidence is frequently utilized to validate witness statements or victim accusations. For instance, if an eyewitness reports seeing a green car strike another vehicle at an intersection, the discovery of a small streak of green paint on the victim's damaged vehicle corroborates the eyewitness claim.
Crime Scene Analysis Case Studies
Case Study 1: Jewelry Store Burglary
Scenario Overview: A jewelry store is broken into overnight. The front glass door is shattered, and multiple jewelry items are stolen from a display case. Investigators locate a partial fingerprint on the display case and a torn piece of fabric snagged on the broken glass. Security video captures blurry footage of a figure breaking in. Later, police stop a suspect possessing a cut on his hand and wearing a damaged jacket.
Evidence Classifications:
Inceptive Evidence: The shattered glass door (establishes the entry point/break-in) and missing jewelry (establishes that a burglary occurred).
Identifying Evidence: The partial fingerprint found on the display case (identifies the specific suspect).
Associative Evidence: The torn piece of fabric snagged on broken glass (links the suspect's attire to the physical crime scene).
Corroborative Evidence: The security camera footage (supports overall evidence by demonstrating the break-in) and the suspect's hand injury and damaged jacket (corroborate the fabric snag and break-in event with the specific suspect).
Case Study 2: Hit-and-Run Vehicle Collision
Scenario Overview: A pedestrian is struck by a motor vehicle on a rainy evening, and the vehicle flees the scene. At the impact site, officers find skid marks and a broken headlight fragment. Eyewitnesses report a dark-colored sedan driving away rapidly. Traces of paint matching a suspect's vehicle are discovered on the victim's clothing, and cellular phone records place the suspect in the immediate vicinity at the exact time of the collision.
Evidence Classifications:
Inceptive Evidence: Skid marks (demonstrate where the incident originated) and the injured victim (indicates an accident or violent event occurred).
Identifying Evidence: The broken headlight fragment (serves to identify the specific vehicle make, model, or individual suspect vehicle).
Associative Evidence: Paint traces left on the victim's clothing (connects the victim directly to the vehicle) and mobile phone records (verifies the suspect's geographic presence near the scene).
Corroborative Evidence: Eyewitness accounts describing a dark-colored sedan (corroborate the vehicle paint evidence and physical headlight remnants).
Evidence Classification Characteristics
Forensic evidence is further distinguished by the precision of its source attribution:
Individual Characteristics:
Definition: Properties of evidence that can be attributed to a single, specific source or individual with an extremely high degree of certainty.
Examples: Fingerprints, DNA evidence, and unique tool marks (such as individual hammer strike impressions).
Significance: Crucial for establishing conclusive links between an exact suspect or tool and a crime scene.
Class Characteristics:
Definition: Properties of evidence that can be associated only with a group, category, or collective source, rather than a single individual entity.
Examples: ABO blood typing, tire tread designs, general bullet shell casing styles, and factory paint chips.
Significance: Essential to collect and analyze because they eliminate non-matching sources, narrow down pools of potential suspects or objects, and corroborate other evidentiary links.
Legal Admissibility of Evidence
For physical evidence to be presented effectively within a court of law, strict legal standards must be satisfied:
Inadmissible Evidence:
Definition: Evidence that cannot be legally introduced or presented in court proceedings, regardless of whether it conclusively proves or disproves a case.
Causes of Inadmissibility: Improper collection protocols, violation of constitutional rights (such as unlawful search and seizure), breach in the chain of custody, contamination, or prejudicial bias.
Admissible Evidence:
Definition: Evidence that satisfies all relevant legal requirements and can be formally presented before a judge or jury.
Criteria for Admissibility:
Legitimately Collected and Maintained: Gathered in full compliance with legal search procedures and maintained under strict chain-of-custody protocols.
Pertinent: Directly relevant and material to the specific facts of the case.
Non-Prejudicial: Its probative value outweighs any unfair prejudice, confusion, or misleading effect on the court.