The Relationship Between Internet Usage and Study Habits

Background of the Study

  • The internet has become an essential tool in modern education, providing support for research, academic tasks, communication, and online learning.
  • Excessive or inappropriate internet use may negatively impact time management, concentration, and study routines.
  • Purpose and manner of internet usage are directly associated with students' learning behaviors.
  • Target Study Population: Grade 12 ASSH students of Agusan National High School.
  • Main Objective: To determine the relationship between internet usage and study habits among Grade 12 ASSH students.

Research Gap and Problem Statement

  • Focus of Previous Studies:
    • Internet usage and academic performance
    • Social media usage
    • Gadget use and learning challenges
    • Study habits and academic achievement
  • Identified Research Gap:
    • There is limited research directly examining the relationship between internet usage and study habits, specifically among Grade 12 ASSH students of Agusan National High School–Senior High School (ANHS-SHS).
  • Central Research Question:
    • Is there a significant relationship between internet usage and study habits among Grade 12 ASSH students?

Statement of the Problem

  • Problem 1: What is the level of internet usage among Grade 12 ASSH students in terms of:
    • 1.1 Frequency of internet use
    • 1.2 Internet use for academic purposes
    • 1.3 Internet distractions
    • 1.4 Responsible internet use
  • Problem 2: What is the level of study habits among Grade 12 ASSH students in terms of:
    • 2.1 Study schedule and time management
    • 2.2 Learning practices
    • 2.3 Concentration while studying
    • 2.4 Learning responsibility
  • Problem 3: Is there a significant relationship between internet usage and study habits among Grade 12 ASSH students of Agusan National High School–Senior High School (ANHS-SHS)?

Hypothesis

  • Null Hypothesis (H0\text{H}_0):
    • H0\text{H}_0: There is no significant relationship between internet usage and study habits among Grade 12 ASSH students.

Theoretical Framework

  • Uses and Gratifications Theory:
    • Authors: Katz, Blumler, & Gurevitch (1973)
    • Premise: Students actively choose how and why they use the internet.
    • Key Explanations: Analyzes different purposes of internet use, including academic activities, information seeking, communication, and entertainment.
  • Self-Regulated Learning Theory:
    • Author: Zimmerman (1989)
    • Premise: Students actively regulate their own learning process.
    • Key Focus Areas: Goal setting, time management, learning strategies, self-monitoring, and learning responsibility.

Conceptual Framework

  • Independent Variable: INTERNET USAGE
    • Frequency of Internet Use
    • Internet Use for Academic Purposes
    • Internet Distractions
    • Responsible Internet Use
  • Dependent Variable: STUDY HABITS
    • Study Schedule & Time Management
    • Learning Practices
    • Concentration While Studying
    • Learning Responsibility

Significance of the Study

  • Students: Increases awareness of responsible internet use and effective study habits.
  • Teachers: Provides insights for developing appropriate teaching strategies and learning activities.
  • Parents: Guides parents in helping students balance internet usage with academic responsibilities.
  • School Administrators: Serves as a basis for programs and policies that promote responsible internet use.
  • Future Researchers: Acts as a reference for related studies examining internet usage and study habits.

Scope and Delimitation

  • Scope:
    • Target Respondents: Grade 12 ASSH students
    • Institution: Agusan National High School–SHS
    • Academic Year: School Year 2026–2027
    • Measured Variables: Internet Usage and Study Habits
    • Primary Instrument: Researcher-made questionnaire
    • Primary Purpose: To determine usage/habit levels and examine the relationship between the two variables.
  • Delimitations (Excluded Variables):
    • Family environment
    • Peer influence
    • Academic motivation
    • Socioeconomic status
    • Learning environment
    • Teacher supervision
    • Academic performance

Review of Related Literature (RRL) Themes

  • Theme 1: Internet Usage in Education:
    • The internet provides access to learning resources and communication channels (Szymkowiak et al., 2021; Hemal et al., 2024).
  • Theme 2: Responsible vs. Excessive Internet Use:
    • Appropriate internet use supports learning, whereas excessive or non-academic use interferes with academic responsibilities (Sabatini, 2023; Masezerano et al., 2025).
  • Theme 3: Internet Usage and Study Habits:
    • Internet use and time management directly associate with students' study behaviors (Rajput & Chaudhary, 2025; Ortizo & Rodriguez, 2025).
  • Theme 4: Study Habits and Academic Behavior:
    • Effective study routines correlate with improved learning outcomes (Abenes et al., 2021; Garay & Gonzales, 2023).
  • Theme 5: Identified Research Gap:
    • Limited studies directly examine the link between internet usage and study habits among Grade 12 ASSH students at ANHS-SHS.

Research Methodology and Design

  • Research Approach: Quantitative Research (utilizes numerical data analyzed via statistical methods).
  • Research Design: Descriptive-Correlational Design
    • Objectives of the Design:
    • 1. Describe the level of internet usage.
    • 2. Describe the level of study habits.
    • 3. Determine whether a significant relationship exists between the two variables.

Participants and Sampling Procedure

  • Target Population:
    • Total Population: 1,1461,146 Grade 12 ASSH students
    • Total Sections: 2828 Grade 12 ASSH sections
  • Final Sample Size: 288288 respondents
  • Sampling Method: Simple Random Sampling (ensures every eligible Grade 12 ASSH student has an equal opportunity to be selected).
  • Formula Used: Cochran's Formula with Finite Population Correction
    • Confidence Level: 95%95\%
    • Margin of Error: 5%5\%

Research Instrument

  • Type: Researcher-Made Questionnaire
  • Basis of Development: Research objectives, conceptual framework, related literature, and previous empirical studies.
  • Measurement Scale: 5-point rating scale:
    • 55 – Always
    • 44 – Often
    • 33 – Sometimes
    • 22 – Rarely
    • 11 – Never
  • Core Variables Measured: Internet Usage and Study Habits.

Data Gathering Procedure

  • Phase 1 – Preparation:
    • Develop the researcher-made questionnaire.
    • Validate the instrument with the research adviser and qualified validators.
    • Conduct pilot testing and implement necessary revisions.
  • Phase 2 – Authorization:
    • Secure permission from school authorities.
    • Coordinate with Grade 12 advisers and selected respondents.
  • Phase 3 – Data Collection:
    • Administer the validated questionnaire to the selected Grade 12 ASSH respondents.
    • Explain the purpose of the study, instructions, confidentiality protocols, and voluntary participation.
  • Phase 4 – Data Processing:
    • Retrieve and verify completed questionnaires.
    • Organize and tabulate the collected data.
  • Phase 5 – Data Analysis:
    • Analyze the data using specified statistical tools.
    • Interpret results according to the research questions and hypothesis.
  • Phase 6 – Ethical Compliance:
    • Maintain confidentiality and secure handling of all data.
    • Ensure informed consent/assent and voluntary participation throughout all stages.

Statistical Treatment of Data

  • Weighted Mean: Applied to determine the level of Internet Usage and Study Habits.
  • Reverse Scoring: Applied to negatively worded items under Internet Distractions.
  • Pearson's r: Applied to determine the strength and direction of the linear relationship between Internet Usage and Study Habits.
  • Alpha Level: 0.050.05 Level of Significance to evaluate statistical significance.
  • Decision Rule for Hypothesis Testing:
    • If p0.05p \le 0.05 \rightarrow Reject H0\text{H}_0
    • If p>0.05p > 0.05 \rightarrow Do not reject H0\text{H}_0

Complete Reference List

  • Abenes et al. (2021)
  • Szymkowiak et al. (2021)
  • Sabatini (2023)
  • Garay & Gonzales (2023)
  • Hemal et al. (2024)
  • Mangacop & Guillena (2024)
  • Cuenca et al. (2024)
  • Masezerano et al. (2025)
  • Ortizo & Rodriguez (2025)
  • Rajput & Chaudhary (2025)
  • Katz et al. (1973)
  • Zimmerman (1989)
  • Department of Education (2009)
  • Republic Act No. 10173 (2012)