traditional grammar 2
Page 1: Traditional Grammar
Definition: Traditional grammar lays down rules of usage in linguistics, focusing on how people should speak and write according to established standards.
Key Characteristics:
Emphasizes correctness over actual usage.
Prescriptivism is a major feature; prioritizes certain language forms, often from another language, over colloquial forms.
Scope:
Not a unified theory for all languages; each language has its own tradition, often based on adaptations of Latin grammar.
Latin viewed as superior to languages like English and French.
Page 2: Historical Overview
Tracing Traditional Grammar: Dates back over 2,000 years, encompassing classical Greece, India, Rome, the Middle Ages, Renaissance, and beyond.
Prescriptive and Proscriptive Rules: Valuation of one dialect as the norm; prescriptive rules dictate what to use, while proscriptive rules state what to avoid.
Key Scholars:
Dionysius Thrax: Created a foundational text (c. 100 BC), The Art of Letters, establishing grammar curriculum.
Marcus Terentius Varro: Produced De lingua latina, focusing on Latin compared to Greek, fundamental in developing Latin grammar.
Medieval Influences: Aelius Donatus and Priscian wrote significant Latin grammars, influencing future European grammars.
Page 3: Influence of the Renaissance
Printing revolution allowed for mass production of grammars mirroring Latin rules; misunderstanding ensued regarding grammar applicability.
Eighteenth Century Contributions:
Over 270 English grammars published; grammar seen as an art or science of correct language usage.
Lindley Murray’s English grammar (1794): Influential during its time, emphasizing a standard variety of English and garnering long-lasting impacts on attitudes toward English.
Traditional grammar viewed as unscientific today, yet basic Latin-based concepts remain widely taught.
Page 4: Characteristics of Traditional Grammar
Limited Scope: Did not study language as a complex system; leaned on disciplines like logic, philosophy, etc.
Bias Against Spoken Language: Assumed spoken language mirrored written rules; failed to address distinctions in speech forms.
Example: Pluralization rules neglect pronunciation variations.
Grammar Focus: Emphasized grammatical rules over meaning and communication dynamics.
Etymological Studies: Traditional grammar included etymology, tracing word origins; acknowledged in Greek studies.
Page 5: Misconceptions and Contributions
Traditional grammar led to misconceptions while contributing significantly to modern linguistics.
Basic concepts (verb, noun, etc.) stem from traditional grammar.
Provided grammatical categories (gender, person, voice, tense) fundamental for modern analysis.
Page 6: Views on Language Change
Conservative Stance: Aimed to preserve pure language forms, viewing changes as degradation.
Nature of Language Change: Essential to language evolution; reflects social conditions and needs without inherent judgement of better or worse.
Role of Standardization: Standardization can serve socio-political functions but does not negate the dynamism of dialects and languages.
Historical Insight: Understanding the history of linguistic studies is crucial for recognizing traditional grammar’s strengths and weaknesses, aiding in contemporary linguistic discourse.