Social Forces on Decision-Making in PSYC 101 (Fall 2025)
Big Question 5
Decisions, decisions, everywhere!
How do we make decisions about the world (and why are we sometimes so bad at it)?
Social Psychology
Definition: Examines the powerful influence of our social and cultural environment on individual and group actions.
Influences on Behavior:
Psychological factors
Biological factors
Social factors
Cultural factors
Core Motivations in Social Psychology
Need to perceive ourselves positively
Need to feel control
Need to belong
Social Psychology: Putting People in Context
Core motivations influence interaction with and understanding of the social world.
Today's Goals
Consider the forces of norms, conformity, and obedience
Understand how we make decisions regarding our behavior versus others' behavior
Describe how social biases help maintain a positive self-view
Understanding Social Norms
Definition of Social Norms: Rules about how we are supposed to act.
Enforcement methods:
Threats of punishment for violations
Promises of reward for adherence
Significance of Norms:
Conventions that make interactions predictable and orderly
Conformity
Definition of Conformity: The tendency to act and think like the people around us.
Reasons for Conformity
Normative Influence:
People conform out of concern for others' perceptions of them.
Informational Influence:
People conform as the actions of others provide information on social appropriateness.
Recognition that perceptions and biases filter our experiences imperfectly.
Obedience
Definition of Obedience: Compliance with orders or commands from authority figures.
Key Concepts in Obedience:
Legitimization of Authority
Entrapment
Obedience to Authority
Can people be compelled to commit harmful acts under obedience?
The Milgram Experiments:
Focus: Individuals' willingness to obey authority figures despite ethical considerations.
Key Conclusion: Situational power greatly affects behavior.
Resulted in the development of Research Ethics Review Boards.
Attribution in Behavior
Attributions: Causal explanations for events, actions, or outcomes.
Types of Attributions:
External/Situational (e.g., someone is late to work due to an emergency)
Internal/Dispositional (e.g., someone is late due to being irresponsible)
Fundamental Attribution Error Definition: The tendency to overlook situational influences on behavior and emphasize personality traits.
Example:
If an interviewer meets a candidate (Valerie) late for an interview, the fundamental attribution error might lead them to see her as irresponsible rather than considering external factors like traffic.
Cultural Differences in Attribution
Fundamental Attribution Error and Culture:
Western cultures (individualistic) tend to favor internal attributions for behavior, while collectivist cultures emphasize situational attributions.
Explanations of Our Own Behavior
Self-Serving Attribution:
We attribute successes to our internal traits and failures to external factors.
This bias affects how we perceive our actions positively.
Self-Serving Biases
Better-Than-Average Effect: Individuals tend to view themselves as better than average in various traits or abilities.
Just-World Hypothesis: Belief that the world is fair and people get what they deserve.
Attitudes and Decision-Making
Definition of Attitude: An individual’s orientation towards a stimulus can influence choices and decisions.
Influences include the dichotomy of comforting lies versus unpleasant truths.
Assessment of Attitudes
Questions for Self-Evaluation (Rating Scale: 1-5):
How much do you value exercise?
How important is charity donation?
How critical is saving for retirement?
Behaviors Assessment
Questions for Self-Evaluation:
Frequency of exercise last week?
Most recent charity donation?
Amount saved for retirement?
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Definition: The theory that individuals are motivated to appear consistent in thoughts, actions, and beliefs.
Cognitive dissonance arises when inconsistency between beliefs and actions occurs, leading to psychological tension that individuals seek to minimize.
Mechanisms to Reduce Dissonance
Change attitudes to match behavior or vice versa.
Examples: If someone believes "Smoking is bad" but smokes, they may change their belief to see smoking as justifiable.
Cognitive Dissonance Research
Classic Experiment by Leon Festinger and James Carlsmith (1959):
Investigated how forced behavior inconsistent with beliefs alters opinions.
Scenario: Belief of "I'm not cheap" conflicts with lying for a small sum of money.
Outcomes involve re-evaluating tasks to alleviate dissonance.
Implications of Cognitive Dissonance
How do individuals reconcile forced actions with private beliefs?
This often leads individuals to reframe their rationale for actions to reduce tensions.
Popular Culture References
Cognitive Dissonance depicted in media (e.g., TV shows).
Reading Assignments
Review chapters 15.9 - 15.19
Hock #37 (A Prison by Any Other Name)
Hock #39 (To Help or Not to Help?)