5.4: The Compromise of 1850
Tension
Land from Mexican-American war raised tensions over expansion of slavery
Wilmot Proviso struck down
Southern Position
Slavery was a constitutional right
Slavery had been decided in Missouri Compromise of 1820
Guarantee of southern lifestyle, so they held onto it
To many, any compromise on slavery attacked the entire system
Free Soil Movement
Northern Democrats and Whigs
New territories acquired should be the dominion of free laborers
Moral and economic
Abolitionists wanted to ban slavery everywhere, saw it as a moral evil
Many free-soilers just wanted to ban slavery for economic reasons; wanted free labor or settlement without competition from enslaved laborers or plantations
Popular Sovereignty
Each territory should decide on slavery themselves
Would’ve been great for southerners if population chose to allow
Lots also still believed in MO Compromise
Only good for free-soiilers if population chose to ban
Southern Strife
CA and NM entered as free states
Southerners threatened secession
Precarious balance of free and slave states in Senate
Also rising population of North, so South needed to hold on to Senate representation
Compromise of 1850
California admitted as a free state
Utah and New Mexico become territories with popular sovereignty
Texas doesn’t get its extreme border, but fed gov assumes some of its public debt
Slave trade banned in Washington DC
Stricter Fugitive Slave Law
Question | Answer |
|---|---|
Southern position on slavery | Slavery is a constitutional right, and it was decided on during the Missouri Compromise |
Free Soil position on slavery | New territories should not have slavery, economic reasons |
Popular Sovereignty position | Territories should decide on slavery themselves |
Why did the land from the Mexican-American War trigger southerners? | CA and NM entered as free states; the South threatened secession. There was a balance of free and slave states in the Senate. |
Compromise of 1850 provisions: | 1. CA admitted as a free state 2. Utah and NM become territories with pop. sovereignty 3. TX doesn’t get its extreme border, but the fed gov assumes some of its public debt 4. No slave trade in Washington DC 5. Stricter Fugitive Slave Law |