Early Universe, Mass–Energy, and the Cosmic Microwave Background

Administrative & Homework Updates

  • Group assignment notice: Students must inform the instructor of preferred partners before the end of the day; otherwise partners will be assigned.
  • Homework update:
    • Added direct link to the required podcast (≈ 50 min) on iHeartRadio; also free on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
    • Registration is normally not required, but if prompted it is free.
    • Recommendation: listen 1–2× (during a walk, gym session, driving, etc.) to ensure comprehension.

Early-Universe Overview

  • Universe began extremely hot and underwent rapid inflation.
  • Tiny energy fluctuations during inflation produced the clumpy large-scale structure we observe today.
  • During the electroweak era:
    • Energy density high enough for spontaneous appearance of elementary particles.
    • Immediate reconversion to energy was common, producing an almost transient particle soup.

Pair Production & Antimatter

  • Pair production mechanism:
    • Two energetic \gamma-ray photons collide → create a particle–antiparticle pair.
    • Example: \gamma + \gamma \rightarrow e^- + e^+ (electron + positron).
  • Antimatter facts:
    • Real, routinely created in modern particle accelerators.
    • Antiparticles share identical mass & behavior but opposite charge (e.g., electron e^- vs. positron e^+).
  • Annihilation:
    • Opposite charges attract; matter + antimatter collision reconverts mass to energy (mutual annihilation).
  • Cosmic asymmetry:
    • Matter exceeded antimatter by ~1 particle per 10^9, reason still not fully understood.
    • Result: present-day universe is matter-dominated, antimatter scarce.

Mass–Energy Equivalence Refresher

  • Einstein’s Special Relativity: E = mc^2
    • E = energy (J)
    • m = mass (kg)
    • c = speed of light \approx 3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1}
  • Units:
    • Energy: joule (J)
    • Power: watt (W) = 1\,\text{J s}^{-1}

Everyday power example

  • A 100 W light-bulb consumes 100 J every second.

Example 1 – Sun’s Power vs U.S. Consumption

  1. Solar power output: P_\odot = 3.88\times10^{26}\,\text{W}
  2. U.S. annual energy use (approx.): E_{US} \approx 1\times10^{20}\,\text{J yr}^{-1} (some slides mention 10^{22}; instructor used 10^{20} in worked solution).
  3. Energy emitted by Sun in 1 s:
    E{1\,s} = P\odot(1\,\text{s}) = 3.88\times10^{26}\,\text{J}
  4. How many U.S.-years in one solar second?
    N = \frac{E{1\,s}}{E{US}} = \frac{3.88\times10^{26}}{1\times10^{20}} \approx 3.9\times10^{6}
  • Interpretation: One second of the Sun’s output equals ~3.9 million years of U.S. energy demand.
  • Ethical/practical takeaway: enormous untapped solar potential vs current fossil-fuel reliance.

Example 2 – Converting Mass to Match U.S. Yearly Energy

Goal: Mass m such that E = mc^2 = 1\times10^{20}\,\text{J}.

m = \frac{E}{c^2} = \frac{1\times10^{20}\,\text{J}}{(3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1})^2} \approx 1.1\times10^{3}\,\text{kg}

  • 1.1\times10^{3}\,\text{kg} \approx 2.5\times10^{3}\,\text{lb} (≈ weight of a compact car).
  • Thought experiment: if we could convert an entire small car’s mass to pure energy with 100 % efficiency, it would power the U.S. for a year.

Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN)

  • Time frame: \sim10^{-4}\,\text{s} to a few minutes after Big Bang.
  • Universe cooled below threshold for fresh proton/neutron creation; existing baryons locked in.
  • Neutron–proton ratio: n/p \approx 1/7 (neutrons slightly heavier → fewer produced).
  • Fusion chain:
    1. p + n \rightarrow {}^2\text{H} (deuterium)
    2. Deuterium + n/p collisions → ^3\text{H} or ^3\text{He}
    3. Rapid formation of ^4\text{He} (very stable).
  • Predicted primordial abundances (by mass):
    • Hydrogen ≈ 74 %
    • Helium-4 ≈ 24 %
    • “Metals” (all heavier elements) ≈ 2 %
  • Observations match predictions → strong evidence for Big-Bang model.
  • Heavier elements (>He) arise later via stellar nucleosynthesis (future lecture).

Beta Decay & Particle Conversions

  • Isolated neutron beta decays:
    n \rightarrow p + e^- + \bar\nu_e (half-life ≈ 15 min).
  • At very high densities/energies, reverse reactions convert protons ↔ neutrons.
  • Once temperature dropped, neutrons could no longer be recreated rapidly; leftover neutrons became locked in helium.

Black-Body Radiation Fundamentals

  • A black body absorbs all incident radiation and re-emits according to its temperature.
  • Key properties:
    1. Emits at every wavelength.
    2. Hotter body → higher intensity at all wavelengths.
    3. Peak wavelength \lambda_{\text{max}} shifts shorter (bluer) for hotter temperatures (Wien’s Law).
  • Graph interpretation:
    • 5 000 K curve peaks in visible (~green) and dominates intensity.
    • 2 000 K curve peaks in IR; visible output appears deep red.
    • Sun ≈ 6 000 K → yellow-white appearance.
  • Temperatures in Kelvins; 1 K ≈ 1.8 °F (exact conversion T{!F} = 1.8(T{!K} - 273.15) + 32).

Recombination & Cosmic Transparency

  • Early universe: fully ionized plasma, teeming with free electrons → strong photon scattering → universe opaque.
  • As expansion cooled gas to ~3 000 K (≈ 380 000 yr post-Big Bang), electrons combined with nuclei ⇒ neutral atoms.
  • Event known as recombination (or photon decoupling) made universe largely transparent.
  • Analogy: fog clearing once water droplets settle; photons can now travel freely.

Scale Factor & Photon Stretching

  • Scale factor (a) quantifies cosmic expansion; by convention a_{today}=1.
  • Photon wavelength stretches with expansion:
    \lambda{obs} = \lambda{emit}\,\frac{a{today}}{a{emit}}
  • Example: Emitted \lambda{emit}=600\,\text{nm} when a{emit}=0.5 ⇒ \lambda_{obs}=1\,200\,\text{nm} (now in IR).

Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB)

  • After ~13.8 Gyr of stretching, original Big-Bang glow now lies in microwave regime (peak ~1 mm, T \approx 2.725\,\text{K}).
  • Discovered accidentally (1965) by Arno Penzias & Robert Wilson at Bell Labs while troubleshooting antenna “noise”.
  • Simultaneously predicted by Princeton group (Dicke, Peebles, Roll, Wilkinson) as leftover thermal radiation.
  • CMB provides one of the strongest empirical pillars supporting Big-Bang cosmology.

Ethical, Philosophical & Practical Implications

  • Immense solar output vs human energy needs highlights sustainability opportunities and current under-utilization.
  • Matter–energy interconversion underscores deep unity of physics and challenges simplistic “mass can’t be destroyed” narratives taught in early schooling.
  • Discovery of CMB via serendipitous engineering work shows value of cross-disciplinary collaboration and open scientific communication.

Looking Ahead

  • Upcoming lectures: detailed CMB mapping missions (COBE, WMAP, Planck), formation of heavier elements inside stars, and deeper exploration of cosmological parameters.
  • Reminder: final-project partner preferences due via email ASAP.