Citizens United Part 2

Supreme Court Proceedings

  • Case in Focus: Debate over McCain-Feingold campaign finance law's constitutionality related to a critique of Hillary Clinton.

  • Justices' Secretive Meeting: After oral arguments, justices gather in the conference room, a private space for discussions and voting on cases.

Conference Room Dynamics

  • C-SPAN Negotiation: Unique access by C-SPAN to film the conference room, though typically off-limits.

  • Justices' Seating: Chief Justice Roberts initiates discussions by summarizing the case specifics and proposing actions (reverse/affirm).

Justices' Division

  • Liberal Justices' Stance: Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Souter oppose Citizens United, viewing it as an ad needing regulation.

  • Conservative Justices' Position: Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts support Citizens United’s claims of free speech violation.

  • Justice Kennedy's Role: Justice Kennedy, the pivotal swing vote, holds significant influence on the outcome.

Justice Kennedy's Profile

  • Background: Noted as the most powerful man in America due to his critical swing votes on various issues.

  • Inconsistent Voting: Kennedy’s decisions span across voting rights, eminent domain, gun rights, and same-sex marriage, often defying clear ideological lines.

  • Influential Experiences: Key experiences, such as the story of Alex Kaczynski from communist Romania and reading "1984" by George Orwell, shape Kennedy’s views on freedom and government reach.

Inside Kennedy's Mind

  • Fear of Authoritarianism: Kennedy’s mindset involves a deep-rooted fear of government overreach, suggesting a belief in a personal zone of liberty.

  • Possible Decision in Citizens United: Postulates that his inclination may tilt towards recognizing Citizens United's rights over campaign finance restrictions.

Souter's Opposition

  • Justice Souter's Reaction: Souter expresses concerns about the potential judicial activism from the court, fearing the implications of unregulated corporate money in politics.

  • Draft Dissent: Produces an explosive dissent that challenges the legitimacy of the court’s ruling on campaign finance.

  • Institutional Integrity Argument: Souter argues for maintaining the court's integrity to avoid appearing as politically biased.

Final Proceedings

  • Re-Argument Notification: Chief Justice Roberts announces a re-argument for Citizens United, postponing a decision for further deliberation.

  • Justice Souter's Departure: Marks Souter's retirement and reflects on his contributions to the court, quoting poet Robert Frost.