Citizens United Part 2
Supreme Court Proceedings
Case in Focus: Debate over McCain-Feingold campaign finance law's constitutionality related to a critique of Hillary Clinton.
Justices' Secretive Meeting: After oral arguments, justices gather in the conference room, a private space for discussions and voting on cases.
Conference Room Dynamics
C-SPAN Negotiation: Unique access by C-SPAN to film the conference room, though typically off-limits.
Justices' Seating: Chief Justice Roberts initiates discussions by summarizing the case specifics and proposing actions (reverse/affirm).
Justices' Division
Liberal Justices' Stance: Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Souter oppose Citizens United, viewing it as an ad needing regulation.
Conservative Justices' Position: Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts support Citizens United’s claims of free speech violation.
Justice Kennedy's Role: Justice Kennedy, the pivotal swing vote, holds significant influence on the outcome.
Justice Kennedy's Profile
Background: Noted as the most powerful man in America due to his critical swing votes on various issues.
Inconsistent Voting: Kennedy’s decisions span across voting rights, eminent domain, gun rights, and same-sex marriage, often defying clear ideological lines.
Influential Experiences: Key experiences, such as the story of Alex Kaczynski from communist Romania and reading "1984" by George Orwell, shape Kennedy’s views on freedom and government reach.
Inside Kennedy's Mind
Fear of Authoritarianism: Kennedy’s mindset involves a deep-rooted fear of government overreach, suggesting a belief in a personal zone of liberty.
Possible Decision in Citizens United: Postulates that his inclination may tilt towards recognizing Citizens United's rights over campaign finance restrictions.
Souter's Opposition
Justice Souter's Reaction: Souter expresses concerns about the potential judicial activism from the court, fearing the implications of unregulated corporate money in politics.
Draft Dissent: Produces an explosive dissent that challenges the legitimacy of the court’s ruling on campaign finance.
Institutional Integrity Argument: Souter argues for maintaining the court's integrity to avoid appearing as politically biased.
Final Proceedings
Re-Argument Notification: Chief Justice Roberts announces a re-argument for Citizens United, postponing a decision for further deliberation.
Justice Souter's Departure: Marks Souter's retirement and reflects on his contributions to the court, quoting poet Robert Frost.