Study Notes on Labov's Social Stratification of (r) in NYC Department Stores
Introduction to the Social Stratification of (r) in New York City Department Stores
Author: William Labov.
Context: Examines the relationship between social class and language variation, focusing on department store employees in New York City.
Key Quote: "As this letter is but a jar of the tongue, it is the most imperfect of all the consonants." (John Walker, 1791)
Methodological Challenges in Studying Language
Primary Challenge: Data collection methods influence the linguistic data gathered.
Taped Interviews: Formal speech, less representative of vernacular.
Responses may be altered due to interviewer presence.
Natural Context Studies: Observations of language use in informal settings (home, peer groups).
Aim of the Chapter: Present results from systematic anonymous observations within the social context of New York City.
Overview of the Study
Setting: Sociolinguistic analysis in New York City, particularly the Lower East Side.
Initial Investigations: Conducted 70 individual interviews and anonymous public observations to establish phonological variables.
Key Variable Studied: The consonantal (r) in post-vocalic positions (e.g., car, card).
Hypotheses Tested:
The variable (r) serves as a social differentiator across all societal levels of New York City speech.
Casual speech in public contexts can yield systematic linguistic data.
The Concept of Social Stratification
Definition by Bernard Barber (1957): Social stratification results from social differentiation and social evaluation. It does not imply specific class structures but indicates systematic differences in status or prestige in society.
General Hypothesis Derived from Interviews: If two subgroups are ranked socially, their linguistic behavior (specifically in the use of (r)) will reflect that same ranking.
Methodology of Research
Testing the Hypothesis:
Focus on subtle stratification within a single occupational group—salespeople in department stores.
Department Stores Selected:
High-Ranked: Saks Fifth Avenue.
Middle-Ranked: Macy's.
Low-Ranked: S. Klein.
Expected Outcomes: Different stores will reflect a consistent pattern in the usage of (r) corresponding to social prestige.
Store Differentiation
Saks Fifth Avenue:
Location: 50th Street and Fifth Avenue.
Characteristics: High prestige, elite shopping experience.
Macy's:
Location: Herald Square, 34th Street and Sixth Avenue.
Characteristics: Middle-range in both price and prestige.
S. Klein:
Location: Union Square, 14th Street and Broadway.
Characteristics: Lower prestige, less fashionable, budget-focused.
Advertising Analysis
Newspaper Advertising Patterns:
Daily News: Primarily read by working-class citizens.
New York Times: Primarily caters to the middle-class demographic.
Advertising Comparison (Oct 24-27, 1962):
NY Times: Saks (2), Macy's (2); Kleins (1/4).
Daily News: Saks (0); Macy's (15); Kleins (10).
Pricing Comparison for Women's Coats:
Saks: $90, Macy's: $79.95, Kleins: $23.
Employee Experience and Conditions
Working Conditions:
Employees' perception of prestige varies by store, affecting their linguistic behavior.
Employees at higher-prestige stores willingness to accept lower wages for prestige benefits.
Wages:
Saks (non-union, generally lower wages) vs. Macy's (unionized, higher wages).
Prestige potentially overrides wage considerations in employee satisfaction.
Socioeconomic Status:
Education level among employees may vary, but working conditions and prestige lead to clear stratification.
Research Method Applied
Customer Interaction Method:
Interviewer posing as a customer requests store information, prompting language use in naturalistic contexts.
Data Collection:
68 interviews at Saks, 125 at Macy's, 71 at Kleins; total approximately 6.5 hours.
Independent Variables: Store, floor, gender, age, occupation, race, accent.
Dependent Variable: Use of (r) in phrases like "fourth floor."
Analysis of Results
Stratification in (r) Usage:
Results show clear social stratification of (r) use correlating with store prestige.
Data Presentation:
Categories used:
All (r-1): Only (r-1, no (r-0).
Some (r-1): At least one (r-1) and (r-0).
No (r-1): Only (r-0).
Results Overview
**Percentage of Use by Store:
Saks: 62% (All (r-1)), 32% (Some (r-1)).
Macy's: 51% (All), 31% (Some).
Kleins: 20% (All), 30% (Some).
Stylistic Variation: Employees exhibit similar fluctuations in the use of (r) across stores. Stratification is consistent across casual and emphatic contexts.
Detailed Result Tables
Table 13.1: Distribution across stores and styles:
Saks: 68 total responses; various instances of (r-1) and (r-0).
Macy's and Kleins also tabulated with different results impacting overall rankings.
Table 13.2: For complete responses, the pattern of differential ranking amongst stores remains evident, confirming the hypothesis.