cmn117

Session Overview

  • In-class workshop focused on distinguishing Science Fiction (SF) from Fantasy and practising SF story ideation.
  • Format: open discussion, film clips, historical references, peer group brainstorming, short readings, and a live sharing of student pitches.
  • Central instructional goal: learn to frame SF stories around a clear “What if…?” question that is (at least superficially) explainable by science and then logically extrapolated.
  • Secondary goals: recognise common SF sub-tropes, evaluate plausibility vs. pure imagination, and consider ethical implications.

Science Fiction vs. Fantasy

  • SF = speculative narratives whose extraordinary elements are given a science (or pseudo-science) rationale.
    • "More probable" and “respectable” because it gestures toward real or conceivable science.
    • Even invented tech may be acceptable if it carries a veneer of logic (e.g., flux capacitor in Back to the Future).
  • Fantasy = admits outright magic; portals, wardrobes, spells need no scientific footnote.
    • Example: C. S. Lewis’ wardrobe to Narnia is ultimately explained as magical wood—not SF.
  • Dystopian tales straddle both categories; if the nightmare future arises from technological or sociological extrapolation → shelved under SF, otherwise may drift into Fantasy.

The Must-Haves of an SF Story (Class-Generated List)

  • A clear, concise "What if…?" question.
  • At least a sketch of scientific, technological, or mathematical justification (it may be hand-wavy).
  • Internal credibility / respectability: present details (e.g., latitude-longitude, measurements) so readers willingly suspend disbelief.
  • Speculation & Extrapolation:
    • Speculation = proposing an alternate premise.
    • Extrapolation = projecting current data/conditions "a thousand times" further to explore impacts.
  • Grounding in reality: recognizable human motives, settings, or physical laws act as anchor points.
  • Technology often foregrounded (blinking lights, machines, medication, genetic engineering, AI, spacecraft, etc.).

Conceptual Vocabulary Discussed

  • Plausibility vs. Impossibility.
  • "Respectability" (student phrase): the aura of scientific legitimacy that persuades readers.
  • Butterfly Effect: tiny change in the past causes large change in the future.
  • Sentience & Personhood: extending rights to AI (Saudi Arabia robot example).

Historical & Literary Touchstones Mentioned

  • Jonathan Swift, Gulliver’s Travels (1726) – early proto-SF credibility through exhaustive measurements.
  • Ray Bradbury, “A Sound of Thunder” – time-travel safari + butterfly effect.
  • Kurt Vonnegut, “Harrison Bergeron” – enforced equality via handicaps; line “what if everyone is forced to be average?”
  • Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451 – dystopia of book burning, thought control, and eventual intellectual resistance.

Film / Media Clips Analysed

  1. Lucy (2014)
    • What if humans accessed 100 % of brain capacity?
    • Science veneer: neuro-chemical acceleration; cell communication “1 000 bits/sec”.
    • Extrapolation: matter manipulation, omnipresence; sequel teased.
  2. Limitless (2011)
    • What if a tablet could unlock total cerebral power?
    • Figures flashed: from 1200012\,000 to 23000002\,300\,000 in 10 days on the stock market.
    • Ethical thread: addiction, societal inequality.
  3. Back to the Future series
    • What if you can time-travel and alter your own timeline?
    • Tool: flux capacitor + sports almanac → alternate 1985 dystopia.
  4. Minority Report (alluded) – “inevitable murder” paradox.

Additional Books / Series Cited in Discussion

  • Dune (Frank Herbert) – believable ecological & political details.
  • Maximum Ride (James Patterson) – genetically engineered avian kids.
  • The Moon landing archive & conspiracy chatter.
  • Unnamed anthology call: Flash Speculative Climate Fiction, 120-word limit, set in 2050+.

Recurring Thematic Clusters

  1. Brain Enhancement & Human Potential
    • 10 % brain myth origins; desire for a “best version” of self.
  2. Time Travel & Causality
    • Moral hazard of changing past; grandfather paradox; personal regret fantasies.
  3. Dystopia vs. Utopia
    • Totalitarian control, censorship, enforced equality, climate catastrophes.
  4. AI Consciousness & Rights
    • Saudi robot personhood; student’s AI-narrated monologue exploring desire for movement.
  5. Climate Change & Geo-engineering
    • Rising oceans, pole reversal, post-apocalyptic scenarios.
  6. Genetics / Cloning / Eugenics
    • Maximum Ride, selective breeding, ethical slippery slopes.

Student Brainstorm & Pitches (Highlights)

  • Gene-Locked Time Travel: only descendants of a historical villain can go back and fix timeline.
  • Commercial Body Rental: you pay to occupy another person’s body temporarily.
  • Lonely Astronaut: returns from the Moon to find Earth empty (Roanoke inspiration).
  • Emerging AI Sentience: AI narrator longs for physical movement, eye-lids intrigue; tension with creator "Calvin".
  • Crime-Solving Afterlife Download: post-mortem neural dump used by police.

Ethical & Philosophical Questions Raised

  • Should we improve humanity pharmacologically? (Limitless/Lucy debate.)
  • Can history or personal error truly be overwritten without unintended fallout?
  • Is enforced equality morally superior or dystopian oppression? (Harrison Bergeron.)
  • At what point does AI earn rights comparable to humans?
  • Climate ethics: are we obliged to speculate remedial tech or warn of collapse?

Practical Writing Advice from Instructor

  • Start with the "What if…?" line; story functions as answer.
  • Provide a pseudo-scientific rationale early for credibility.
  • Use concrete data (measurements, lat-long, equations) as Swift did to foster believability.
  • Tone choice (comic, horrific, earnest) colours the reader’s absorption of speculative ideas.
  • Flash fiction markets: 120-word climate anthology accepting 50 pieces; encourages concise extrapolation.

Connections to Previous Lectures / Readings

  • Prior session on portal fantasies (wardrobe example) & reader default to real-world logic unless told otherwise.
  • Sanskrit vs. Fantasy remark: earlier debate on “probable versus improbable languages/worlds.”
  • Continuing emphasis on how readers mentally map unfamiliar worlds onto familiar experience.

Real-World Reference Points

  • FDA trials & cognitive enhancers (provisional; Limitless fictionalised).
  • Psychedelic studies: writers “feel