common law - equity - adversary system

Common Law System

  • Definition: Incorporates judge-made law and legislation.

  • Development of Legal Principles: Evolves from individual cases rather than a coherent legal theory.

  • Procedural Style: Utilizes adversarial procedures, where the judge's role is less active compared to inquisitorial systems. The procedure often resembles a hybrid model.

  • Case Proceedings: Typically proceeds as one continuous hearing.

  • Emphasis on Rights: Prioritizes the rights of the accused in criminal matters.

  • Value of Particularity: Tailored to accommodate local community values and customs.

  • Doctrine of Precedent: Similar cases are resolved consistently, and lower courts must follow legal principles established by higher courts.

Civil Law System

  • Historical Background: Evolved from the rediscovery of Roman law texts during the 11th century.

  • Codification of Law: Features a comprehensive legal code (e.g. Code Napoleon) that compiles laws as opposed to a system based on judgments.

  • Accessibility of Law: Citizens can easily access legal principles without needing to sift through various judgments, making the law more user-friendly.

  • Judicial Role: Judges operate in an inquisitorial capacity, gathering evidence, calling witnesses, and directing legal proceedings.

  • Function of Judges: They apply law without creating it; their role is primarily administrative.

  • Reasoning Approach: From general rules to specific cases.

  • Value Orientation: Aspires to deliver justice, focusing on the ideal notion of law rather than strictly resolving disputes.

Concept of Equity

  • Definition: Pertains to principles of fairness that modify the early common law system.

  • Historical Development: Originated from the King's Court of Advisers, which evolved to formal judicial functions to provide remedies for disputes.

  • Formalization of Complaints: Early grievances were documented as pleas, leading to the development of a rigid writ system under common law.

  • Limitations of Common Law: Rigid procedures limited avenues for justice, necessitating an alternative that the lord chancellor provided, focusing on fairness rather than strict forms.

  • Court Rivalry: Courts of equity and common law were separate entities until the Judicature Act of 1875 unified their administration.

  • Contemporary Use of Terms: "Common law" contrasts with civil law systems and denotes judge-made law in relation to equity principles.

Australian Legal System

  • Influence of Colonization: Shares common law roots with the UK due to colonization.

  • Historical Context: Judges appointed by the king traveled to settle disputes in a manner that differed from local customary courts.

  • Evolution of Remedies: Over time, judges created new remedies to address societal needs, developing incrementally without a coherent theoretical basis.

  • Judicial Reasoning: Judges use an inductive approach, leading from specific cases to general legal principles.

Other World Legal Systems

  • Common Law Nations: Found in Australia, England, the US, New Zealand, and India (former British colonies).

  • Civil Law Regions: Present in Western Europe, Latin America, and Indonesia (areas influenced by France, Portugal, and Spain).

  • Sharia Law: Based on the Quran, applies in certain jurisdictions.

  • Customary Law: Rooted in the customs and traditions of indigenous peoples.

Adversarial System

  • Main Features:

    • Party Control: Litigation management is largely the responsibility of the parties involved.

    • Evidence Procedure: Each party presents witnesses, with opposing counsel performing cross-examinations to challenge credibility.

    • Judicial Role: Judges act as referees rather than questioners.

    • Hearing Structure: Emphasizes a continuous hearing.

    • Compliance Enforcement: Only enforced at party request, rather than proactively by the court.

  • Inquisitorial System Contrast: Judges are more active and involved in evidence gathering in civil law countries.

  • Functionality Rationale: Promotes thorough fact presentation and issue clarification, leading to impartial verdicts.

  • Criticism: Disadvantages individuals lacking legal representation, knowledge, or funds; can result in prolonged and costly litigation.

  • Tribunals: Many utilize features of the inquisitorial system for a more informal process, allowing tribunal members to engage actively in proceedings.

Recap

  • Reviewed characteristics of the common law and civil law systems, explored the concept of equity, and analyzed features and justifications of the adversarial system.