International Trade Notes

International Trade

Introduction

  • Comparative Advantage:
    • A country possesses a comparative advantage in producing a good if it can do so at a lower opportunity cost than other nations.
    • Countries engaging in trade can benefit if each specializes in exporting goods for which they hold a comparative advantage.
  • Welfare Economics:
    • The principles of welfare economics are applied to understand the sources of gains from trade and their distribution.

The World Price and Comparative Advantage

  • PWP_W = World Price:
    • This is the prevailing price of a good in the global market.
  • PDP_D = Domestic Price:
    • This represents the price of a good within a country, absent of international trade.
  • If P<em>D<P</em>WP<em>D < P</em>W:
    • The country has a comparative advantage in producing the good.
    • Under conditions of free trade, the country will export the good.
  • If P<em>D>P</em>WP<em>D > P</em>W:
    • The country does not have a comparative advantage.
    • Under free trade, the country will import the good.

The Small Economy Assumption

  • Price Taker:
    • A small economy is considered a price taker, meaning its actions do not influence the world price, PWP_W.
    • This assumption simplifies analysis without altering its fundamental lessons.
  • Free Trade:
    • When a small economy engages in free trade, PWP_W becomes the relevant price.
    • Sellers won't accept less than PWP_W, as they can sell at that price in world markets.
    • Buyers won't pay more than PWP_W, as they can purchase at that price in world markets.

A Country That Exports Soybeans

  • Without Trade:
    • P_D = $4, Quantity = 500
  • With Free Trade:
    • P_W = $6
    • Domestic consumers demand 300 units.
    • Domestic producers supply 750 units.
    • Exports = 450 units.
  • Welfare Effects:
    • Without Trade:
      • Consumer Surplus (CS) = A + B
      • Producer Surplus (PS) = C
      • Total Surplus = A + B + C
    • With Trade:
      • CS = A
      • PS = B + C + D
      • Total Surplus = A + B + C + D
      • Gains from trade = D

Active Learning 1: Analysis of Trade

  • Without Trade:
    • P_D = $3000, Quantity = 400
  • With Free Trade:
    • P_W = $1500
    • Domestic consumers demand 600 units.
    • Domestic producers supply 200 units.
    • Imports = 400 units.
  • Welfare Effects:
    • Without Trade:
      • CS = A
      • PS = B + C
      • Total Surplus = A + B + C
    • With Trade:
      • CS = A + B + D
      • PS = C
      • Total Surplus = A + B + C + D
      • Gains from trade = D

Summary: The Welfare Effects of Trade

  • Imports:
    • Consumer surplus rises.
    • Producer surplus falls.
    • Total surplus rises.
    • P<em>D>P</em>WP<em>D > P</em>W
  • Exports:
    • Consumer surplus falls.
    • Producer surplus rises.
    • Total surplus rises.
    • P<em>D<P</em>WP<em>D < P</em>W
  • Whether a good is imported or exported, trade creates winners and losers, but the gains always exceed the losses.

Other Benefits of International Trade

  • Increased Variety:
    • Consumers have access to a broader range of goods.
  • Economies of Scale:
    • Producers can sell to larger markets, potentially lowering costs through economies of scale.
  • Increased Competition:
    • Competition from abroad can reduce the market power of domestic firms, enhancing total welfare.
  • Enhanced Flow of Ideas:
    • Trade facilitates the spread of technology and ideas globally.

Why All the Opposition to Trade?

  • Gains and Losses:
    • Trade can make everyone better off, and the winners could compensate the losers.
    • However, compensation rarely occurs.
  • Concentrated vs. Diffuse Effects:
    • Losses are often concentrated among a small group, who feel them acutely.
    • Gains are spread thinly over many people, who may not perceive the benefits.
  • Incentives:
    • The losers have a greater incentive to organize and lobby for trade restrictions.

Tariff: An Example of a Trade Restriction

  • Tariff Definition:
    • A tariff is a tax on imports.
  • Example:
    • Cotton shirts with a world price of P_W = $20.
    • Tariff: T = $10\/shirt.
    • Consumers must pay $30 for an imported shirt, allowing domestic producers to charge the same.
  • General Effect:
    • The price facing domestic buyers and sellers equals PW+TP_W + T.

Analysis of a Tariff on Cotton Shirts

  • Without Tariff:
    • P_W = $20
    • Buyers demand 80 shirts.
    • Sellers supply 25 shirts.
    • Imports = 55 shirts.
  • With Tariff:
    • T = $10\/shirt, price rises to $30.
    • Buyers demand 70 shirts.
    • Sellers supply 40 shirts.
    • Imports = 30 shirts.
  • Welfare Effects:
    • Without Tariff:
      • CS = A + B + C + D + E + F
      • PS = G
      • Total surplus = A + B + C + D + E + F + G
    • With Tariff:
      • CS = A + B
      • PS = C + G
      • Revenue = E (tariff revenue)
      • Total surplus = A + B + C + E + G
      • Deadweight loss = D + F
  • Deadweight Losses:
    • D = deadweight loss from overproduction of shirts.
    • F = deadweight loss from under-consumption of shirts.

Import Quotas: Another Way to Restrict Trade

  • Definition:
    • An import quota is a quantitative limit on the import of a good.
  • Effects:
    • Similar effects to a tariff:
      • Raises price, reduces the quantity of imports.
      • Reduces buyers’ welfare.
      • Increases sellers’ welfare.
  • Revenue:
    • A tariff creates revenue for the government, while a quota creates profits for foreign producers, unless the government auctions licenses to import.

In the News: Textile Imports from China

  • Expiration of Quotas:
    • On December 31, 2004, U.S. quotas on apparel & textile products expired.
  • Impact:
    • U.S. imports of these products from China increased significantly.
    • Loss of jobs in the U.S. textile industry.
  • Response:
    • The U.S. textile industry & labor unions fought for new trade restrictions.
    • The National Retail Federation opposed any restrictions.
    • Bush administration agreed to limit growth in imports from China.

Arguments for Restricting Trade

1. The Jobs Argument
  • Claim:
    • Trade destroys jobs in industries that compete with imports.
  • Economists’ Response:
    • Rising imports do not necessarily cause rising unemployment, because job losses from imports are offset by job gains in export industries.
    • Even if all goods could be produced more cheaply abroad, the country need only have a comparative advantage to have a viable export industry and to gain from trade.
2. The National Security Argument
  • Claim:
    • An industry vital to national security should be protected from foreign competition to prevent dependence on imports during wartime.
  • Economists’ Response:
    • Policy should be based on true security needs.
    • Producers may exaggerate their importance to national security to obtain protection.
3. The Infant-Industry Argument
  • Claim:
    • A new industry needs temporary protection until it matures and can compete with foreign firms.
  • Economists’ Response:
    • It is difficult for the government to determine which industries will eventually be able to compete, and whether the benefits of establishing these industries exceed the costs to consumers of restricting imports.
    • If a firm will be profitable in the long run, it should be willing to incur temporary losses.
4. The Unfair-Competition Argument
  • Claim:
    • Producers argue their competitors in another country have an unfair advantage, e.g., due to government subsidies.
  • Economists’ Response:
    • Subsidies from other countries are beneficial because the gains to our consumers will exceed the losses to our producers.
5. The Protection-as-Bargaining-Chip Argument
  • Claim:
    • The U.S. can threaten to limit imports to bargain for trade concessions.
  • Economists’ Response:
    • If the other country refuses, the U.S. faces two bad options:
      • Restrict imports, which reduces welfare in the U.S.
      • Don’t restrict imports, and suffer a loss of credibility.

Trade Agreements

  • Liberalizing Trade:
    • A country can liberalize trade through unilateral reductions in trade restrictions or multilateral agreements with other nations.
  • Examples:
    • North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
    • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)
  • World Trade Organization (WTO):
    • Established in 1995 to enforce trade agreements and resolve disputes.

Chapter Summary

  • Exports:
    • A country will export a good if the world price is higher than the domestic price without trade.
    • Trade raises producer surplus and total surplus but reduces consumer surplus.
  • Imports:
    • A country will import a good if the world price is lower than the domestic price without trade.
    • Trade raises consumer and total surplus but lowers producer surplus.
  • Tariffs:
    • A tariff benefits producers and generates government revenue, but the losses to consumers exceed these gains.
  • Arguments for Restricting Trade:
    • Common arguments include protecting jobs, defending national security, helping infant industries, preventing unfair competition, and responding to foreign trade restrictions.
    • Economists generally believe that free trade is the better policy, though some arguments may have merit in certain cases.