International Trade Notes
International Trade
Introduction
- Comparative Advantage:
- A country possesses a comparative advantage in producing a good if it can do so at a lower opportunity cost than other nations.
- Countries engaging in trade can benefit if each specializes in exporting goods for which they hold a comparative advantage.
- Welfare Economics:
- The principles of welfare economics are applied to understand the sources of gains from trade and their distribution.
The World Price and Comparative Advantage
- PW = World Price:
- This is the prevailing price of a good in the global market.
- PD = Domestic Price:
- This represents the price of a good within a country, absent of international trade.
- If P<em>D<P</em>W:
- The country has a comparative advantage in producing the good.
- Under conditions of free trade, the country will export the good.
- If P<em>D>P</em>W:
- The country does not have a comparative advantage.
- Under free trade, the country will import the good.
The Small Economy Assumption
- Price Taker:
- A small economy is considered a price taker, meaning its actions do not influence the world price, PW.
- This assumption simplifies analysis without altering its fundamental lessons.
- Free Trade:
- When a small economy engages in free trade, PW becomes the relevant price.
- Sellers won't accept less than PW, as they can sell at that price in world markets.
- Buyers won't pay more than PW, as they can purchase at that price in world markets.
A Country That Exports Soybeans
- Without Trade:
- With Free Trade:
- P_W = $6
- Domestic consumers demand 300 units.
- Domestic producers supply 750 units.
- Exports = 450 units.
- Welfare Effects:
- Without Trade:
- Consumer Surplus (CS) = A + B
- Producer Surplus (PS) = C
- Total Surplus = A + B + C
- With Trade:
- CS = A
- PS = B + C + D
- Total Surplus = A + B + C + D
- Gains from trade = D
Active Learning 1: Analysis of Trade
- Without Trade:
- P_D = $3000, Quantity = 400
- With Free Trade:
- P_W = $1500
- Domestic consumers demand 600 units.
- Domestic producers supply 200 units.
- Imports = 400 units.
- Welfare Effects:
- Without Trade:
- CS = A
- PS = B + C
- Total Surplus = A + B + C
- With Trade:
- CS = A + B + D
- PS = C
- Total Surplus = A + B + C + D
- Gains from trade = D
Summary: The Welfare Effects of Trade
- Imports:
- Consumer surplus rises.
- Producer surplus falls.
- Total surplus rises.
- P<em>D>P</em>W
- Exports:
- Consumer surplus falls.
- Producer surplus rises.
- Total surplus rises.
- P<em>D<P</em>W
- Whether a good is imported or exported, trade creates winners and losers, but the gains always exceed the losses.
Other Benefits of International Trade
- Increased Variety:
- Consumers have access to a broader range of goods.
- Economies of Scale:
- Producers can sell to larger markets, potentially lowering costs through economies of scale.
- Increased Competition:
- Competition from abroad can reduce the market power of domestic firms, enhancing total welfare.
- Enhanced Flow of Ideas:
- Trade facilitates the spread of technology and ideas globally.
Why All the Opposition to Trade?
- Gains and Losses:
- Trade can make everyone better off, and the winners could compensate the losers.
- However, compensation rarely occurs.
- Concentrated vs. Diffuse Effects:
- Losses are often concentrated among a small group, who feel them acutely.
- Gains are spread thinly over many people, who may not perceive the benefits.
- Incentives:
- The losers have a greater incentive to organize and lobby for trade restrictions.
Tariff: An Example of a Trade Restriction
- Tariff Definition:
- A tariff is a tax on imports.
- Example:
- Cotton shirts with a world price of P_W = $20.
- Tariff: T = $10\/shirt.
- Consumers must pay $30 for an imported shirt, allowing domestic producers to charge the same.
- General Effect:
- The price facing domestic buyers and sellers equals PW+T.
Analysis of a Tariff on Cotton Shirts
- Without Tariff:
- P_W = $20
- Buyers demand 80 shirts.
- Sellers supply 25 shirts.
- Imports = 55 shirts.
- With Tariff:
- T = $10\/shirt, price rises to $30.
- Buyers demand 70 shirts.
- Sellers supply 40 shirts.
- Imports = 30 shirts.
- Welfare Effects:
- Without Tariff:
- CS = A + B + C + D + E + F
- PS = G
- Total surplus = A + B + C + D + E + F + G
- With Tariff:
- CS = A + B
- PS = C + G
- Revenue = E (tariff revenue)
- Total surplus = A + B + C + E + G
- Deadweight loss = D + F
- Deadweight Losses:
- D = deadweight loss from overproduction of shirts.
- F = deadweight loss from under-consumption of shirts.
Import Quotas: Another Way to Restrict Trade
- Definition:
- An import quota is a quantitative limit on the import of a good.
- Effects:
- Similar effects to a tariff:
- Raises price, reduces the quantity of imports.
- Reduces buyers’ welfare.
- Increases sellers’ welfare.
- Revenue:
- A tariff creates revenue for the government, while a quota creates profits for foreign producers, unless the government auctions licenses to import.
In the News: Textile Imports from China
- Expiration of Quotas:
- On December 31, 2004, U.S. quotas on apparel & textile products expired.
- Impact:
- U.S. imports of these products from China increased significantly.
- Loss of jobs in the U.S. textile industry.
- Response:
- The U.S. textile industry & labor unions fought for new trade restrictions.
- The National Retail Federation opposed any restrictions.
- Bush administration agreed to limit growth in imports from China.
Arguments for Restricting Trade
1. The Jobs Argument
- Claim:
- Trade destroys jobs in industries that compete with imports.
- Economists’ Response:
- Rising imports do not necessarily cause rising unemployment, because job losses from imports are offset by job gains in export industries.
- Even if all goods could be produced more cheaply abroad, the country need only have a comparative advantage to have a viable export industry and to gain from trade.
2. The National Security Argument
- Claim:
- An industry vital to national security should be protected from foreign competition to prevent dependence on imports during wartime.
- Economists’ Response:
- Policy should be based on true security needs.
- Producers may exaggerate their importance to national security to obtain protection.
3. The Infant-Industry Argument
- Claim:
- A new industry needs temporary protection until it matures and can compete with foreign firms.
- Economists’ Response:
- It is difficult for the government to determine which industries will eventually be able to compete, and whether the benefits of establishing these industries exceed the costs to consumers of restricting imports.
- If a firm will be profitable in the long run, it should be willing to incur temporary losses.
4. The Unfair-Competition Argument
- Claim:
- Producers argue their competitors in another country have an unfair advantage, e.g., due to government subsidies.
- Economists’ Response:
- Subsidies from other countries are beneficial because the gains to our consumers will exceed the losses to our producers.
5. The Protection-as-Bargaining-Chip Argument
- Claim:
- The U.S. can threaten to limit imports to bargain for trade concessions.
- Economists’ Response:
- If the other country refuses, the U.S. faces two bad options:
- Restrict imports, which reduces welfare in the U.S.
- Don’t restrict imports, and suffer a loss of credibility.
Trade Agreements
- Liberalizing Trade:
- A country can liberalize trade through unilateral reductions in trade restrictions or multilateral agreements with other nations.
- Examples:
- North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
- General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)
- World Trade Organization (WTO):
- Established in 1995 to enforce trade agreements and resolve disputes.
Chapter Summary
- Exports:
- A country will export a good if the world price is higher than the domestic price without trade.
- Trade raises producer surplus and total surplus but reduces consumer surplus.
- Imports:
- A country will import a good if the world price is lower than the domestic price without trade.
- Trade raises consumer and total surplus but lowers producer surplus.
- Tariffs:
- A tariff benefits producers and generates government revenue, but the losses to consumers exceed these gains.
- Arguments for Restricting Trade:
- Common arguments include protecting jobs, defending national security, helping infant industries, preventing unfair competition, and responding to foreign trade restrictions.
- Economists generally believe that free trade is the better policy, though some arguments may have merit in certain cases.