3/19 - Social Darwinism
In the wake of Darwin, general evolution gets applied to EVERYTHING, specifically the social world. When we think of Darwin, what we really think of is Darwinisms, not Darwin himself. The understanding of what Darwin means is locked into debates into the natire of people themselves and peoples organizations
The term “evolution” isn’t even a word Darwin uses
put into human society
Herbert Spencer
“survival of the fittest”
anti-government; contrast between gilded age-capitalism and the rise of unionism
the government has no place interfering in society
libertarian position
individualism
the individual can make their own decisions free from constraints
no regulation
no government interference
essentially justifies slavery
goes against socialism
should be heavily regulated in a socialist system where the needs of the group outweigh the needs of the individual, or should individual freedom be prioritized
robber barons vs drive for socialist organizations that advocate for stable working conditions, pay, no child-labor
Wilb Vs. Huxley
Wilb - I don’t wanna be related to an ape
Hux - I would rather be related to an ape than a religious nut like you
critique against organized religion
critique of the uniqueness of homo sapiens
are people unique?
Darwinism give you the ability to answer biological questions without organized religion.
Warfare of Science and Religion - Andrew Dickson White
Huxley agrees that religion and science do not go along with each other
Others argue that Darwinism and religion can coexist
Interconnection/Co-Construction
Scientific communities/knowledge is shaped by, and shapes, social , political, economic knowledge
science co-constructs economics and vice versa
Co-construction - shaped by, and shapes
EVERYTHING’S CONNECTED
because Darwinism is systemically governmental, fascism occurs when embraced
German fascism embraces many of the ugly parts of social Darwinism
Rasenhygiene (Racial Hygiene)- German word for eugenics
more active process of “sanitizing” the race through exclusion so then the other race is eliminated from the gene pool entirely
ends in genocide
the harsher the conditions, you’ll end up with only the “fittest” of survival
ends up with the ‘fittest” of the jews…can’t have that…enter the Holocaust
social Darwinism caused the Holocaust essentially
if they haven’t dont the Final Solution, and waist their resources, could they have won against the Soviets?
the American argument is that they lost huge amount of talent, as the Jews that fled formed the heart of the American technology in the war. like the atomic bomb
if they used their talents, they could have mase substantial progress, but instead they’re forced into it by the created social system
Eugenics in each different location is very different bc American eugenics was more about heredity (American Breeders LMAOOOO), German is racial, Australia is environmental
in the early 1900s, practically everyone had eugenics
All scientific knowledge and the way its practices is shaped in its social context. They get themselves into this position.