Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) Overview and Protocol
Narrative Exposure Therapy: Basis and Core Aims
Designed specifically for survivors who have suffered repeated traumatic events.
Foundations and clinical roots:
- Drawn directly from testimony approaches.
- Maintains a foundational human rights focus.
Overarching therapeutic aim:
- To embed traumatic experiences firmly into an individual's autobiographical life context.
Functions and rationale of the human rights focus:
- Directly assists with resolving re-experiencing symptoms.
- Helps individuals understand complex patterns of behaviours, thinking, and feeling.
Questions & Discussion
- Question regarding clinical application in training:
- Why am I doing it in placement if it is deemed a time-limited approach?
- Contextual consideration: Narrative Exposure Therapy is structured as a short-term, time-limited manualised intervention, making its implementation within clinical placements a specific model for treating cumulative trauma efficiently by contextualising fragmented memories into an autobiographical narrative.
Memory Systems in Trauma: Traumatic Versus Normal Memory
Traumatic Memory characteristics:
- Fragmented: Stored in disconnected pieces rather than an integrated whole.
- Experienced as now: Carries no temporal distance; relived in the present moment.
- Sensory and emotional experience: Highly affective and sensory, making it inherently hard to verbalise.
- Vivid with a sense of current threat: Accompanied by intense perceptual clarity and immediate danger.
- Easily triggered: Readily activated by trauma-related cues and reminders.
- Non-contextual: Not anchored in context or historical time.
Normal Memory characteristics:
- Chronological: Organised sequentially along a timeline.
- Experienced as a past memory: Consciously recognised as an event that occurred in the past.
- Narrative form: Encoded as a coherent story; does not invoke high sensory arousal during recall.
- Faded: Perceived with natural temporal fading; distinctly recognised as belonging to the past.
- Ethical recollection: Permits reflective, coherent, and ethical recall of events.
- Autobiographical context: Firmly situated within the broader context of personal life history.
Neurobiology of Traumatic Memory: Amygdala and Hippocampal Disconnect
Core neurobiological structures:
- Amygdala: Operates as the brain's threat system, governing the fight-or-flight survival response.
- Hippocampus: Dedicated brain region responsible for storing, integrating, and contextualising information.
Disconnect mechanism during traumatic exposure:
- A distinct functional disconnect occurs between the amygdala and the hippocampus during trauma.
- Under acute threat, the amygdala becomes increasingly active, shifting all resources to focus entirely on survival.
- Simultaneously, the hippocampus becomes overloaded, impairing its optimal functioning and preventing normal contextual storage.
Flashbacks and processing failure:
- The occurrence of a flashback following trauma is a normal psychological and biological attempt to process memory.
- Processing failure occurs when flashbacks happen outside the window of tolerance:
- The hippocampus goes offline.
- The amygdala fires repeatedly.
- The memory fails to process and remains trapped in an unintegrated state.
Dual-Memory Representation: Cold Declarative Versus Hot Non-Declarative Memory
Cold Memory (Declarative):
- Provides contextual anchoring.
- Encodes declarative facts: who, what, where, and when.
Hot Memory (Non-Declarative):
- Imbued with an active sense of current threat.
- Stores comprehensive and detailed sensory, cognitive, emotional, and motor information.
- Characteristically non-contextual.
- Identifies the specific memory network that needs active therapeutic processing.
Fear Networks and Stimulus Generalisation
Structural organisation of fear networks:
- Fear networks are interconnected through matching sensory, cognitive, and affective stimuli.
Activation dynamics:
- A sensory reminder belonging to a single traumatic incident can trigger the simultaneous activation of multiple connected fear networks.
Interpretative impact:
- Cognitive interpretations become tied to a multitude of cumulative past trauma exposures.
Narrative Exposure Therapy Protocol Structure
Diagnostic Interview - Assessment:
- Comprehensive assessment and baseline diagnostic profiling before commencing exposure sessions.
Session 1 - Psychoeducation:
- Educating the client on trauma mechanisms, the functioning of memory systems, and the rationale behind exposure.
Session 2 - NET Lifeline:
- Construction of the physical lifeline representing the person's entire autobiographical history.
Session 3 - Narration of Early Life:
- Beginning the chronological testimony process, initiating narration from early childhood.
Session 4 Onwards - Progressive Review and Narration:
- Each session begins by re-viewing the written narration recorded during the prior session.
- Narration proceeds forward through recent life events.
- The pace is slowed down deliberately when reaching stories/traumatic events to enable deep exposure and emotional processing.
The NET Lifeline Methodology and Symbolic Components
Lifeline purpose and overview:
- Acts as a structured map providing a bird's-eye overview of the life experienced thus far.
- Focuses explicitly on engaging cold memory (declarative contextual information).
- A photograph is taken at the end of the session to preserve the completed layout.
Symbolic components used on the lifeline:
- Stories / Stones: Represent negative events.
- A big stone represents long periods of trauma.
- Smaller stomes/stones represent specific negative events placed alongside.
- Flowers: Represent positive life events and resources.
- Coiled up part: Denotes future aspirations and hopes.
- Stick: Signifies aggressive acts the individual has committed.
- Candles: Represent experiences of loss, whether symbolic loss or bereavement.