soc 169 10/16
Introduction
Discussion on school incentives and collective rewards in education.
Anecdotes about group activities like rewarding students with trips to SeaWorld for good grades.
Behavioral Principles and Conditioning
Positive and Negative Responses:
Positive responses increase behavior frequency.
Negative responses decrease behavior frequency.
Development of associations and habits over time (e.g., associating candy with reward).
Matching Law
Introduced by B.F. Skinner.
Components of the Matching Law:
The law examines the relationship between the value of rewards and the probability of obtaining them.
Key Criteria:
Likelihood of Success:
Example: Hunting a rabbit has a success rate of 90% (high), while hunting a deer has a success rate of 20% (low).
Value of Reward:
Deer has a higher value than a rabbit but is riskier to pursue.
Rationality Principle:
Value times probability informs decision making, but is context-dependent.
Contextual Example:
A rabbit may become sacred in a tribe's cultural shift, changing its perceived value.
Deprivation versus Satisfaction
People have thresholds for valuing rewards.
Example:
Bringing flowers is more impactful the first time than if done routinely.
Fasting Example:
Ramadan where the first meal at sunset is highly valued, but subsequent meals may lose value.
Fairness Study with Capuchin Monkeys
Initial experiment with two capuchin monkeys showing expectations of reward and its emotional effects.
Experiment Procedure:
Monkeys perform tasks for rewards (cucumber vs. grapes).
Monkeys react negatively to inequality when one monkey gets grapes and the other cucumber.
Emotional Response:
Monkeys show frustration when expectations of rewards are not met (equity).
Behavioralism and Social Exchanges
Shift from individual behaviorism to the exchange between individuals, focusing on interaction (Peter Blau).
Three Factors influencing exchanges:
Psychological aspects and personality.
Social-psychological dimensions (how we relate in groups).
Emergent properties from exchanges that establish dynamics of power.
Social vs Economic Exchanges
Key Differences:
Social exchanges are based on trust and are not formal contracts.
Example: Inviting someone over to dinner but not immediately reciprocating feels weird.
Trust, Obligations, and Social Capital
Social exchanges cultivate a notion of reciprocity and obligations.
Comparative Analysis:
Prostitution as monetary exchange vs. adultery as a more complex social exchange.
Participants often seek relationships without power imbalances (self-explanatory).
Marginal Utility and Norms
Thresholds and Saturation:
Overindulgence diminishes value (marginal utility).
Norms of reciprocity and fairness dictate social interactions; perception of fraud can destroy relationships.
Emergence of Social Power
Social power emerges through unequal exchanges.
Characteristics of Unequal Exchanges:
Social capital influences group participation.
Availability of alternatives can affect power dynamics.
The use of force leads to domination, and consistency affects relationships.
Secondary Exchange Relations
Concept applied to group dynamics; for example, a tutor who can connect individual relationships to collective understanding among students.
Example:
Group of students realizing they share a common relationship with their tutor.
Mutualized Extinction and Individuality
Introduced by Randall Collins, emphasizing individuality as socially constructed across settings and temporal contexts.
Identity Expression:
Defined by social categories (age, gender, nationality), not an essence.
Critique of Exchange Theory
Traditional models inadequately account for altruistic behaviors.
Collins suggests emotional energy as a common metric, influencing social interactions and behavior.
Rhythmic Entrainment
Individuals synchronize through bodily co-presence, energy levels dictate social interactions.
Barriers to Outsiders:
Symbolic or physical hurdles signify group identity and commitment.
Conclusion
The evolution from individual behavioralism to collective social interactions highlights complex motivations in relationships and emphasizes emotional energy as a driving factor in social exchanges.
Discussions also view social norms and power dynamics, illustrating how interactions evolve in various situational contexts.