Untitled

The project funded by the MPO (Missing Persons Organization) through the US Embassy.
Pertains to missing persons in Lithuania, specifically related to families in distress when individuals go missing.
Involved the experience of a particular family whose son went missing in the 1990s, prompting the establishment of a support center due to dissatisfaction with the investigation speed.

The center was founded in 1996 to address the inadequacies in how missing person cases were handled.
Efforts to research the fate of the missing individual: resulted uncertain whether he was murdered or officially dead, as details are difficult to ascertain due to the language barrier (details primarily in Lithuanian).
Plans to obtain updates about the case when available.

Mention of Lithuania joining the Amber Alert system; this originated in the U.S. following a case involving a girl named Amber and has become a part of international safety efforts.
Points to the interconnectedness in victimology across Europe, highlighting collaboration among EU nations in addressing missing persons through systemic initiatives.

Discussion about conducting a training workshop, reflecting on the translator requirements for the event—three quarters of Lithuanians speak English but with varying fluency.
Importance of submitting materials in advance for live translation during the training process.
Reflect on the learning dynamics in cross-cultural settings and the necessity for adaptation in communication methods.

Attendees included counselors and educators focused on young individuals.
Engaged participants in group activities tailored toward better understanding victim issues, specifically in a youth context and digital environments.
The involvement of various professionals including police officers and prosecutors during initial group segments.

Insights about the architecture in Lithuania, characterized as gothic and post-Soviet styles, demonstrating the historical context of the area.
Personal observations of the geopolitical situation, particularly Russia's proximity and national sentiments, reflected in public displays like the Ukrainian flag amidst regional tensions.
Discussion of local cultures and casual interactions such as feeding stray cats and personal anecdotes.

Initiation of a recap regarding previous class discussions on cyber violence and related challenges.
Definition of Cyber Violence: encompasses various forms of online crimes, including sexual offenses and harassment (e.g., blackmail).
The distinct approach required when addressing these issues with law enforcement, focusing on factual information and statistical data.
Emphasis on the incorporation of laws from neighboring countries to provide a contextual understanding of cyber offenses.

Consideration of different teaching content depending on the audience's focus (law enforcement vs. educators working with youth).
Suggestions for educators: include discussions about socialization and norms, and recognizing online behaviors indicative of problematic situations or potential harm.
Importance of creating a safe environment for youth to express curiosity about sexual and relationship norms to prevent harmful silence.

Training educators to detect issues in student behaviors and empower them to respond effectively in line with institutional policies and best practices.
Special attention to cases spanning borders, particularly those that involve online interactions and collaborations among countries for a more cohesive approach to prevention.

The example of the SOSA (Social Order Safety Alliance): suggested as a potential partner for integrating law enforcement collaboration from the initial stages.
Discussion of how SOSA engages in prevention education alongside direct law enforcement actions.
The importance of teaching collaborative responses as part of the training material and the value contributed by shared knowledge and insights.

Reflection on the capstone class and the need for diverse victim advocates; acknowledgment of the extensive need for individuals in victim services domains.
Mention of international consulting and the respect for US research in global settings; opportunities for collaboration with US embassies and NGOs overseas.
Emphasized the importance of being trained in victim advocacy and the spreading of research-based truths to various audiences, including law enforcement and educational institutions.

Review due dates for course assignments and projects, including interviews and peer reviews.
Discussion surrounding deliverables approaching in the course and planning accordingly to meet deadlines.

Students sharing insights from their interviews with victim advocates, discussing prevalent issues such as DUI cases and the emotional impact on victims' families.
Discussion on the differing perceptions of justice and system responses to crime, with specific examples provided.
Identification of societal sentiments towards crime and those in the criminal justice system, noting the cultural sentiments echoed in youth graffiti observed in Lithuania.

Closing remarks encouraging student participation and feedback; emphasis on the importance of collaboration among peers and having contact information for group projects.