Study Notes on Police Patrol

Chapter 6: Police Patrol

Police Patrol Overview

  • Purpose: Police patrol aims to maintain presence in the community to prevent crime.

  • Common Types: The most prevalent type of police patrol is vehicle patrol.

Reactivity in Policing

  • Reactive Policing: Involves responding to incidents after they have occurred rather than preventing them beforehand.

Allocation of Police Patrol

  • Geographic Jurisdictions: Police patrol areas are designated geographic jurisdictions known as beats.

  • Beat Size: The size of each beat is determined by factors such as the number and nature of calls received.

  • Police Patrol and Call Priority: Effective allocation of patrol units based on the urgency and type of calls received.

Call Priority Management

  • Prioritization of Calls: Critical calls are prioritized for a faster response.

  • Emergencies: Emergencies require more resources and quicker response times as they are of utmost importance.

Handling Non-Emergency Calls

  • The 311 System: A non-emergency number used for police and/or city services. It aims to reduce the volume of calls to 911, which are often still managed by police.

Differential Police Responses (DPRs)

  • Definition: DPRs are response strategies that manage police workloads by allowing officers to focus on higher-priority incidents, optimizing the use of time and resources.

  • Characteristics: These responses may not always involve immediate dispatch and can limit proactive policing efforts.

Preventive Patrol

  • Deterrent Effect: The presence of marked police vehicles in certain areas can deter criminal activity.

  • Engagement Variables: The effectiveness of preventive patrol is dependent on staffing and time available for patrol duties.

Directed Patrol

  • Assignment: Officers are strategically assigned to specific locations known as "hot spots" where crime rates are higher.

  • Critics' Concerns: This method is criticized for potentially leading to over-policing in certain areas that may be perceived as disproportionately targeted.

  • Target Categories:

    • Hard Targets: Locations that are highly guarded.

    • Soft Targets: Areas that are unprotected or vulnerable to crime.

Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment (1972-1973)

  • Findings: The experiment's results indicated that variations in patrol levels did not significantly affect crime rates.

  • Public Perception: Although there was no effect on crime, public perception of safety increased in areas with more patrol.

  • Replication in Other Cities: Similar experiments in Newark, NJ, showed consistent results regarding public perceptions of safety.

Hot Spot Policing

  • Concept: Criminal activity is often concentrated in specific areas, necessitating targeted police efforts in these locations known as hot spots.

  • Characteristics of Hot Spots:

    • These are areas with a high concentration of crime within small geographic spaces.

  • Additional Resources: Hot Spot Policing often involves deploying additional squad cars, enhancing focus on detecting and seizing illegal guns.

  • Results: Increased illegal gun seizures reported with potential deterrent effects noted in crime rates.

Issues with Hot Spot Policing

  1. Effectiveness Recognition: Hot Spot Policing is widely accepted as an effective crime reduction strategy.

  2. Community Relations: There are concerns that this approach may strain community relationships with law enforcement.

Broken Windows Theory in NYC (1990s)

  • Overview: The strategy emphasized increased police presence and engagement with the community to deter minor offenses and prevent larger crimes.

  • Overpolicing Elements: The approach often led to increased scrutiny and resource allocation towards minor illegal conduct.

Police Crackdowns

  • Definition: Police crackdowns involve concentrated efforts to deter crime through three major events: awareness, presence, and consistency in enforcement.

  • Temporary Deterrence: Intended to create an initial deterrent effect, leading to potential residual impacts on crime rates.

  • Relation to the War on Drugs: Crackdown strategies were notably utilized during the War on Drugs.

Traffic Stops

  • Commonality: Traffic stops are the most frequent reason for police contact, typically resulting from violations that can lead to further investigative actions.

  • Effectiveness Concerns: Limited evidence supports that these stops actively reduce crime; studies also indicate potential biases affecting their application and effectiveness.

Pedestrian Stops

  • Legal Basis: Conducted under reasonable suspicion, often involving frisking for weapons. Such stops account for about 1% of all citizen-police interactions, commonly referenced as Terry stops.

  • Case Law: Originating from the landmark case Terry v. Ohio, these stops and frisks are subjected to ongoing scrutiny with mixed research results regarding their impact on crime reduction.

One- and Two-Officer Squads

  • Safety Benefits: Two-officer squads provide enhanced safety and support in high-risk situations, allowing for immediate backup that reduces risks during patrol in potentially dangerous areas.

  • Cost Efficiency: One-officer units may offer better cost efficiency, allowing police departments to allocate resources more effectively; however, they increase risks due to lack of immediate support during critical incidents.

Foot Patrol

  • Popularity: Foot patrol represents the second most common form of police patrol, particularly favored by larger police departments committed to community policing efforts.

  • Goals: Aimed at reducing crime and fear while improving personal relationships within the community.

Research on Foot Patrol

  • Perceptions of Crime: Foot patrol has been shown to correlate with perceived lower crime levels.

  • Effectiveness: Crime reduction effects are particularly noted in hot spots, with increased perceptions of safety in the areas being actively patrolled.

Offender-Focused Strategies

  • Intelligence Use: Strategies depend heavily on gathering and utilizing criminal intelligence to identify repeat offenders.

  • Impact on Law-Abiding Citizens: These approaches are designed to be less intrusive to law-abiding citizens while being more precise in reducing crime overall.